Michael Hickman
Albrechtstrasse 100
26388 Wilhelmshaven
Amtsgericht Wilhelmshaven
-Familiengericht-
Amtsgericht, Postfach 1154,
26388 Wilhelmshaven
04421 408 117
Beschwerdezyklen beim Justizministerium von Niedersachsen AKTENZEICHEN 4121
E -S4. 54/03 und AKTENZEICHEN 3700 E - 204.37/03
Dr. Busch, Frau Bakker, Herr Wessels, Frau Ballnus
Am Waterloo Platz 1
30169 Hannover
poststelle@mj.niedersachsen.de
Eberhard Menzel
Der Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Wilhelmshaven
Rathausplatz 1
26382 Wilhelmshaven
Niedersächsischer Landtag
Hinrich-Wilhelm-Kopf-Platz 1
30159 Hannover
Postfach 4407
30044 Hannover
vockert@vockert.de,
klaus.krumfuss@t-online.de,
info@frauke-heiligenstadt.de
The Hague Conference on Private International Law Mr. Hans van Loon, Secretary
General
Prof. William Duncan
Deputy Secretary General
Permanent Bureau of
The Hague Conference
on Private International Law
Scheveningseweg 6
2517 KT Den-Haag
The Netherlands
Wd@hcch.nl
Hvl@hcch.nl
secretariat@hcch.net
Mr Sibusiso Bengu
The South African Ambassador to Germany
South African Embassy
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin
botschaft@suedafrika.org
The South African President
Mr. T.M. Mbeki
Office of the President
Private Bag X1000
Pretoria 0001
Südafrika
President@po.gov.za
|
Marita Sehn
Anke Schwarzbäck
Petition Committee at the German Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss des deutschen Bundestages
Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
Fax: 030 227 30015
marita.sehn@bundestag.de
klaus.hagemann@bundestag.de
Wolfgang Thierse
President of the German federal parliament
Präsident des Deutschen Bundestages
Personal Referent
Persönlicher Referent
Wolfram Kolodziej-Derfert
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
wolfgang.thierse@bundestag.de
praesident@bundestag.de
Deutscher Richterbund
Vorsitzender Wolfgang Arenhövel
Kronenstr. 73/74
10117 Berlin
Wolfgang.Arenhoevel@lg-os.niedersachsen.de
frank.sta.freiburg@t-online.de
jan.grotheer@fg.justiz.hamburg.de
elmar.herrler@olg-n.bayern.de
brigitte.kamphausen@lg-duisburg.nrw.de
BettinaLeetz@web.de
August-Wilhelm.Marahrens@lg-h.niedersachsen.de
dwtapper@rz-online.de
HanspeterT@t-online.de
info@drb.de
Institut für Menschenrechte
Institute for human rights, Berlin
info@institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de
Commission on Human Rights
Support Services Branch
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
1503@ohchr.org
Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg
Postfach 2451
26014 Oldenburg
Poststelle@olg-ol.niedersachsen.de
|
16 September 2003
The official application to institute criminal proceedings
against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg on the grounds
of kidnapping, child trafficking and the formation of a criminal association
with the German Family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee at the German
federal parliament,
With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition proceedings
at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630 the herein documented
events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the regional court of
Wilhelmshaven are indicated as further proof for the establishing of an independent
enquête committee on the judiciary crimes against humanity by the practice
of German family law jurisdiction.
Why are there written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively invalid
for a certain population group due to sex, status, and nationality out of
political motivation?
The official application to institute criminal proceedings
against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg on the grounds
of kidnapping, child trafficking and the formation of a criminal association
with the German Family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Copy to the file 16 F 229/03 UG of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven 15. September 2003
Reasoning: Correctly founded rejection of judges due
to bias
Judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg was rejected according
to § 42 of the civil process regulations (the right of rejection), due
to the concern that he would be biased. The rejection based on the grounds
of mistrust of the impartiality of judge Kuhlmann was justified based on
the documented case of international child abduction to Germany and the resulting
boycott of access.
The application the higher regional court of Oldenburg according to §44
of the civil process regulations (application of rejection) was made in accordance
with the regulations against judge Kuhlmann. The grounds for the rejection
were correctly made credible.
Consult the petition "Legalisation of boycott of access in the wake of international
child abduction by German authorities by Germany" from 10. August 2003 to
the higher regional court of Oldenburg file number 14 UF 126/03 UG:
Rejection of judges of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
due to bias
From the tool-set of manipulation filters applied by German authorities the
higher regional court of Oldenburg with the judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr.
Schubert chooses as already documented for the manipulation of complaint
proceedings the specific tool of confirming and covering the incorrect proceedings
of the German family judge Staubwasser from the district court of Wilhelmshaven
by copying and duplicating these incorrect proceedings.
The aim of these manipulation is to build up a wall of silence around the
political motivation by pushing away the circulating responsibilities within
the initial proceedings as well as within the resulting complaint proceedings
so that the judiciary scandals are hidden and the incorrect proceedings are
covered.
a) Decision of 15.08.2001 document number 16 F 605/00 UG by the German family
judge Dr. Bessel of the District Court of Wilhelmshaven ordering contact
between the children and father of the children.
b) boycott of the court ordered contact on the 21.08.03 with the help of
third parties.
c) non-enforcement of the court order for access
d) undue delay of proceedings in child matters by the court over a period
of more than one year
e) 03.09.02 The broadcasting of the ARTE TV documentary (Theme evening. War
over children)
f) 04.09.02 FILE NUMBER 16 F 605/00 UG. Court hearing at the district court
of Wilhelmshaven. After undue delay of one year at the district court of
Wilhelmshaven, the German family judge Staubwasser sets a delay for his decision
taking, which the German family judge Staubwasser deliberately exceeds.
g) Decision dated 04.10.02 FILE NUMBER 16 F 605/00 UG of the German family
law judge Staubwasser, which is only published after official complaints
against undue delay. Arbitrary denial of access on access, which has not
taken place over the period of one year, whereas the court ordered access
has not been enforced by the court.
The judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher regional court
of Oldenburg engage in deliberate careless consultation of the file as documented
in the decision of the higher regional court of Oldenburg on this part of
the proceedings' history.
The judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher regional court
of Oldenburg they are responsible by deliberately covering their German jurist
colleague, i.e., the German family judge Staubwasser from the district court
of Wilhelmshaven, for the practised and documented leitkultur at the district
court of Wilhelmshaven within the German family law policy (see Section 5a,
5b1, 5b2, 5c).
Hereby the official legal demand is entered for rejection of the judges Bartels,
Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher regional court of Oldenburg due to
bias.
Deliberate violation of the civil procedure regulations by judge Kuhlmann
of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
The higher regional court of Oldenburg has documented with the decision 01.09.03,
postmark 04.09.03, file number 14 F 126/03 UG considerable irregularities
in respect to the procedural requirements in the case at hand of international
child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access.
The rejected judge, judge Kuhlmann has under breach of duty and violation
of §44 civil procedural regulations deliberately ignored to answer the
reasons for rejection. The applicant has deliberately not been informed by
the higher regional court of Oldenburg about the statement of the rejected
judge Kuhlmann which are mandatory duty.
Under the violation of § 48 civil procedural regulations judge Kuhlmann
has deliberately not informed the higher regional court of Oldenburg, competent
for the demand of rejection, that judge Kuhlmann informs about circumstances,
compare the explanations under 1 a), which could justify a rejection or that
due to other reason judge Kuhlmann should be excluded in accordance with
legal guidelines.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that judge Kuhlmann is deliberately
ignoring the application for rejection on the grounds of bias. In addition,
judge Kuhlmann is simultaneously violating the civil procedural regulations
in his decision whereas judge Kuhlmann himself quotes the civil procedural
regulations.
Deliberate violations of the legal demand to refrain from the attempt to
incite the petitioner to committing the criminal offence of trafficking of
child and humans
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional court of Oldenburg
have documented in the case concerned of international child abduction to
Germany that, the applicant, the foreign left behind father, who has
kidnapped no children, has not legalised child abduction, neither has he
participated in child trafficking or has he legalised child trafficking.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg has correctly been informed about
the legal demand to refrain from the attempt to incite the petitioner to
committing the criminal offence of child trafficking.
Consult the petition "Legalisation of boycott of access in the wake of international
child abduction by German authorities by Germany" from 10. August 2003 to
the higher regional court of Oldenburg file number 14 UF 126/03 UG.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner of the
child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt to
incite the petitioner and father of the child to acts of criminal offences
in trafficking of children and humans by intentionally generating turnover
and profit of judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German
authorities in child abduction, boycott of access and misuse of authority.
Nevertheless, the higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that, judge
Kuhlmann, who is deliberately ignoring the rejection application due to bias,
handed in correctly, simultaneously violates the civil procedural regulations,
compare the explanation given under 1a) and 1b), and takes a decision in
which judge Kuhlmann imposes costs on the applicant, the foreign left behind
father, who does not kidnapped children, who does not legalise child abduction,
who neither participates in child trafficking nor legalises child trafficking.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that judge Kuhlmann deliberately
abuses FGG 13a, to discriminate against and to disadvantage the foreign left
behind father, as FGG 13a only represent a "can " and not a "must" provision.
With the imposition of costs on the parent who has acted legally, who as
documented does not resort to take the law into his own hands, does
not kidnap children to gain advantage for himself and to influence
decisions in custody cases, judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of
Oldenburg intends purposefully to complicate the realisation of the rights
of the bi-national children and their foreign left-behind parent.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that judge Kuhlmann is
of the personal political view, that in cases of international child abduction
to Germany, the foreign left behind victim parent and the foreign left behind
environment must pay the court costs for the legal proceedings on access
with the children brought to Germany. Even as documented in the present case
where access ordered by the court in Germany is deliberately not enforced
over a period of more than one year.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents in the case concerned, that
the legal policy acting of judge Kuhlmann in the judicial reality has nothing
whatsoever to do with the term " the wellbeing of the child," but that "the
German wellbeing of the child" as within the practised family law policy
by judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg represents only
a ostensible reason presented and a placeholder for "economic" and "political"
interests that are hostile to the wellbeing of the child.
The regional court of Oldenburg has documented in the case at hand, that
judge Kuhlmann from the higher regional court of Oldenburg intends that family
law proceedings and decisions for access which are deliberately not enforced,
are to be financed by not only the foreign left-behind parent and environments
but also by the German tax money.
As documented at the higher regional court of Oldenburg, judge Kuhlmann from
the regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert engages in his political aim
of self-acquittal in writing in the style of Persilscheine whereas there
is a wide gap between the social reality and the constructed, theoretical
judicial reality.
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional court of Oldenburg
have documented in the case concerned of international child abduction to
Germany that the applicant and foreign left behind father does not kidnap
children, does legalise child abduction, and does neither legalise nor engage
in child trafficking.
By means of legalising child abduction and the abuse and exploitation of
children in child trafficking turnover and profit for the German judicial
business shall be generated.
The official application is made to the director of the district court of
Wilhelmshaven Kahlen to institute criminal proceedings against judge
Kuhlmann of higher regional court of Oldenburg
Hereby the legal demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven
and to Mr. Kahlen, director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, to correctly
process complete criminal charges against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg. The usual judicial delay of two weeks is to be observed,
in order to notify the applicant of receipt of the present document and of
the allocated file number. Should this legal matter be forwarded by the district
court of Wilhelmshaven, the appropriate copies of all documentation with
entry and forwarding confirmation together with the present complete documentation
and the respective exit stamp are to be correctly sent as well to the applicant
for documenting the administrative act by the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare the explanations
in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c), and in accordance with the official
guidelines of the Federal justice ministry (file number R B 3 - to: 9311/22-2-23
335/2033 from 14. April 2003) as well as in accordance with the official
guidelines of the justice ministry of Lower Saxony. (File number 4121 E -S4.
54/03 from 11.02.2003 and from 01. August 2003), criminal charges against
judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg are directly entered
at the district court of Wilhelmshaven as well as to the politically and
morally responsible director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen
on the grounds of kidnapping § 235 German criminal code and of child
trafficking § 236 German criminal code. Thereby it has to be examined
via the proper legal action, whether judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg is under circumstances deliberately engaging in committing
the criminal offences mentioned earlier.
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare the explanations
in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c) and in accordance with the official
guidelines of the Federal justice ministry (file number R B 3 - to: 9311/22-2-23
335/2033 from 14. April 2003) as well as in accordance with the official
guidelines of the justice ministry of Lower Saxony. (File number 4121 E -S4.
54/03 from 11.02.2003 and from 01. August 2003), criminal charges against
judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg are directly entered
at the district court of Wilhelmshaven as well as to the politically and
morally responsible director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen
on the grounds of formation of criminal conspiracy § 129 German criminal
code. Thereby it has to be examined via the proper legal action, whether
judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg is under the circumstances
deliberately engaging in committing the criminal offences mentioned earlier.
The criminal offence of criminal conspiracy with the German family judge
Staubwasser from the district court of Wilhelmshaven is to be examined via
the regular legal action separately in each and every single charge already
entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven against the family judge Staubwasser.
In accordance with the statements of the deputy director of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Schroeder from 18.08.03 and from 27.08.03 FILE
NUMBER 313E, the criminal charges listed in the following have already been
forwarded from the district court of Wilhelmshaven to the competent office
of the public prosecutor. by.
--- 5 pages documentation and presentation of evidence from the 30.07.03.
criminal charges against employees of the district court of Wilhelmshaven:
German criminal code §267 falsification of documents, §269 falsification
of proof relevant data, violation of procedural requirements and irregularities
by violating the right to a fair trial.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 31.07.03. criminal
charges against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code § 202 violation of postal secret,
§ 202a espionage of data, § 267 falsification of documents, §
269 falsification of proof relevant data, § 274 burking of documents.
Indicating a document in the decision as so-called proof material without
providing the source and origin as well as deliberate refusal of verification
of the document's by the German family judge Staubwasser of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven against official legal demands
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 01.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code. § 263 deception in legal proceedings,
§ 339 misuse of authority, deliberate deception of participants in the
proceedings by deliberately re-naming participants of proceedings participating
in the court hearing from 21.05.2003 for advantaging
participants of proceedings by the German family law judge Staubwasser of
the district court of Wilhelmshaven
--- 6 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 03.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family court judge Staubwasser of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 153 false declaration
under oath, § 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 misuse
of authority, § 269 falsification of proof relevant data, § 274
burking of documents, § 348 false documented statements in office. Deliberate
false declarations on the documentation of the petitioner, the status of
the file in the legal case and deliberate burking of documents by violating
the right to fair trial by rejecting of offered evidence given by the German
family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 04.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 235 child abduction, §
263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 Misuse of authority, §
StGB 269 falsifying of proof relevant data. Deliberate false declarations
on the documented proceedings of the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the
social reality as well as in judicially constructed reality by the German
family judge Staubwasser of the district court of in the presented case of
international child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access
since 1995.
--- 9 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 05.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven. German criminal code: § 239a Erpresserischer
Menschenraub, § 240 Coercion, § 241 threatening, § 241a political
persecution, § 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 misuse
of authority. Deliberate coercion of the petitioner and father of the child
under violation of freedom of speech with the intention of the German family
judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, to blackmail, threat
and intimidate with the threat and coercion to prevent the access to the
children, if the petitioner and father of the child is complaining in public
and in the media about the incorrect proceedings of German judicial and social
authorities of Wilhelmshaven in family law proceedings on international child
abduction to Germany, whereas the German family judge Staubwasser is engaging
in the political persecution of children rights and human rights activists.
--- 9 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 06.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate
slandering, § 187 slandering. Deliberate insult, defamation and discrediting
of the petitioner and father of the child and deliberate biased proceedings
by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
as intentional distraction from the incorrect proceedings of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 07.08.03. Criminal
charges against the family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of
Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate
slandering, § 187 slandering, § 189 deliberate insult of the memorial
of deceased. deliberate insult of the memorial of deceased, here the foreign
left behind grandfather of the children brought to Germany in family law
proceedings by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven in the present case of international child abduction and
the resulting boycott of access
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 07.08.03. Criminal
charges against the family court judge Staubwasser of the district court
in Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate
slandering, § 187 slandering, $ 189. Deliberate slandering, defamation
and discrediting of the binational children participating in the proceedings
in the present case of international child abduction and the resulting boycott
of access by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven
--- 20 pages documentation and presentation of evidence from 08.08.03. Criminal
charges against the family court judge Staubwasser of the district court
in Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 83 preparation of high treason,
§ 86 distribution of propaganda material of organisations violating
the German constitution, § 132 pretending office titles, § 211
preparation and attempt of judiciary murder, § 234 Trafficking of humans,
§ 235 child abduction, § 239 preparation and attempt of deprivation
of freedom, § 241a political persecution. Preparation of high treason
and as well as distribution of propaganda material of organisations violating
the German constitution for protection and propaganda reasons of German crimes
against humanity, while with the pretension of office titles preparation
and attempt of deprivation of freedom and judiciary murder is effected in
order to promote the political persecution of children rights and human rights
activists while the illegal legalisation of trafficking of humans and child
abduction is used for the coercion and blackmailing of the petitioner and
father of the child in the present case of international child abduction
and the resulting boycott of access.
Therefore it has to be examined via the proper legal channels judge Kuhlmann
of the higher regional court of Oldenburg together with the German family
judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven have engaged in
the formation of a criminal conspiracy, whereas the pursuit of which appears
after considering all circumstances as unacceptable as it is against the
basic values of a state order that respects human dignity. In addition, it
has to be clarified who plays a leading role and who works in the background
of the criminal conspiracy for the legalisation of international child abduction
and boycott of access in respect to abuse and exploitation of children within
the child trafficking of the German judicial business.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of applying the working methods
of the Nazi-jurists within the present legal matter
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt of
applying the working methods with the principles "There is honour among thieves"
and "Acquittal for their own purposes" of the Nazi-jurists within the present
legal matter.
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the systematic
self-acquittal for own purposes with writing in the style of Persilscheine.
Legal demand for expeditious proceedings
Especially, as the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder had expeditious proceedings
even against the free press in the legal matter "coloured hair" before the
culminating point of the election campaign 2002 whereas proceedings on child
abduction, boycott of access, violation of custody, misuse of authority,
and German crimes against Humanity are deliberately delayed and are deliberately
not correctly processed.
It is supposed that the German "independent, non-political and non-corrupt"
judiciary as represented here by the district court of Wilhelmshaven has
a clear understanding of the value of legal goods "coloured hairs vs. Children
and Humans."
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner of the
child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt to
incite the petitioner and father of the child to acts of criminal offences
in trafficking of children and humans by intentionally generating turnover
and profit of judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German
authorities in child abduction, boycott of access and misuse of authority.
Legal delay
The district court of Wilhelmshaven has the usual legal delay of two weeks
to inform the petitioner about the entry of the present document and the
file number of the present legal matter.
Dear Mr. Kahlen, director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
Dear Mr. Schroeder, deputy director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
As the moral and political directors of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
you are certainly interested in a praiseworthy manner to proof that you personally
have broken with the fatal continuity of the working methods of the Nazi-Jurists
in the judicial reality of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The self-acquittal of the Judiciary is an incident with many participants,
which links the history of the federal republic to the history of the Third
Reich.
The Post of Gdansk
History of a German Judicial Murder
It is documented that the main denazification committee of the district of
Oldenburg promoted among others on 22.2.1949 the career of the Nazi-Jurist
Dr. Bode within the Federal Republic of Germany, who had taken part in the
judicial murder of Gdansk.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your action pattern
of responsible German jurists has to be definitely supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
to open a memorial at the entrance to the district court of Wilhelmshaven
that names the Nazi-Jurists who were active in Hitler's regime who later
made careers in the Federal Republic of Germany, in particular in the region
of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg
Your personal stance of moral courage is welcomed to distance yourself in
public from, what has been documented by world history on the German terror
judiciary. Certainly, you are aware in your daily business how easily the
German judiciary is to be abused as an instrument of terror with manipulation
of files and proceedings to match politically predetermined court decisions.
Your sincere approach as German jurists to learn your lessons from that for
your legal policy interpretations and your legal policy practising within
the German Federal Republic of Germany is definitely welcomed.
It is to be assumed, that you personally as decent, respectable Germans,
additionally as German jurists in political offices, will have no problems
at all with facing and coming to terms with the past of the German judicial
history and that you correctly and with good will, transparency and honest
enlightenment and clarification of facts stand up as a trend-setting good
example for humanity, human rights and democracy within the judicial reality
of the German Federal Republic of Germany.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your action pattern
of responsible German jurists has to be definitely supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven
to order the following touring exhibitions for the delay at least of one
month to the district court of Wilhelmshaven by exhibition exchange every
six months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in the name of the German
people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War mööt
wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia in the state hospital
and nursing home/mental institution Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven (1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners under National
Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the City of Oldenburg
during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the region of Oldenburg
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
to open a memorial that names the German Jurists in the region of Wilhelmshaven
and Oldenburg who have stood up against Adolf Hitler in front of the memorial
at the entrance to the district court of Wilhelmshaven that names the Nazi-Jurists
who were active in Hitler's regime who later made careers in the Federal
Republic of Germany, in particular in the region of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg.
Your personal stance of moral courage is welcomed to distance yourself in
public from, what has been documented by world history on the German terror
judiciary. Certainly, you are aware in your daily business how easily the
German judiciary is to be abused as an instrument of terror with manipulation
of files and proceedings to match politically predetermined court decisions.
Your sincere approach as German jurists to learn your lessons from that for
your legal policy interpretations and your legal policy practising within
the German Federal Republic of Germany is definitely welcomed.
The praiseworthy approach not only to name German jurists without backbone
but also to name the jurists of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg, who demonstrated
moral courage as German jurists, and who would rather be sent to concentration
camps than to be subjected to the political instrumentalisation of the German
judiciary, is welcomed.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of
the present document is two weeks.
The official complaint to the supervision authority judge Kuhlmann of the
regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert for the violation of the right to
a fair trial and the right to be heard to the justice ministry of Lower Saxony
Dear Mr. Kramer, president of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the higher regional court of Oldenburg,
As the moral and political president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
you are certainly interested in a praiseworthy manner to proof that you personally
have broken with the fatal continuity of the working methods of the Nazi-Jurists
in the judicial reality of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The self-acquittal of the Judiciary is an incident with many participants,
which links the history of the federal republic to the history of the Third
Reich.
The Post of Gdansk
History of a German Judicial Murder
It is documented that the main denazification committee of the district of
Oldenburg promoted among others on 22.2.1949 the career of the Nazi-Jurist
Dr. Bode within the Federal Republic of Germany, who had taken part in the
judicial murder of Gdansk.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your action pattern
of responsible German jurists has to be definitely supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the higher regional court of Oldenburg
an the morally and politically responsible president Kramer, to work on special
exhibition about character pattern, misuse of authority, and abuse of power
by German judges in the Hitler-Regime, which can serve as a touring exhibition
as a presentation to the public at the higher regional court of Oldenburg
as well as at other German courts.
The official inauguration should take place in the foyer of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg, whereas the general overview and the basic thoughts of
the touring exhibition should be available as a permanent exhibition in the
foyer of the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
The suggestions for the base thoughts are : independence and moral courage
of German judges as well as the acting of German judges under the tension
on the one hand of state ideologies, political influence and on the other
hand of humans humanity and human rights departing from the case Ewald Schlitt
(see section explanations in 4c1) in this respect), Hitler's political instrumentalisation
of the German judiciary as well as resistance respectively non-resistance
of German jurists against Hitler and against political instrumentalisation
of the German judiciary.
Dear Mrs. Silke Osterthun from the higher regional court of Oldenburg, thank
you very much for your correct email-confirmation for the entry of the complaints
to the supervision authority against judge Bartels and judge Schubert from
the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
Dienstaufsichtbeschwerden vom 04.09.2003 und 07.09.2003
Sehr geehrter Herr Hickmann,
hiermit bestätige ich den Eingang Ihrer Dienstaufsichtbeschwerde
gegen Richter Bartels vom 04.09.2003 und den Eingang Ihrer Dienstaufsichtbeschwerde
gegen Richter Schubert vom
07.09.2003.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Im Auftrag
Dr. Oehlers
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare the explanations
in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c), the complaint to the supervision authority
with disciplinary measures and dismissal from office is entered against the
judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg at the higher regional
court of Oldenburg on grounds of violations of the right of fair trial and
the right to be heard.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of
the present document is two weeks.
Dear Dr. Busch, Mrs. Bakker, Mr. Wessels, Mrs. Ballnus,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony,
In the German history of international child abduction the proceedings of
judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony already have
a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice
and due to certain traditional family law practice. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
With reference to the complaint cycle document number 4121 E -S4. 54/03 and
document number 3700 E - 204.37/03, official demand is made to the justice
Ministry of Lower Saxony in respect of the official stance of the Justice
Ministry of Lower Saxony as to the amount of voluntary reparations payments
that the Justice Ministry of lower Saxony is prepared to recommend to the
Land of Lower Saxony to pay to the UN-Children's Rights Commission, to UNICEF,
to the Commissioner for Human Rights at the European Parliament, project
for the Protection of Human Rights, as well as national and international
NGO's active in the field of missing, exploited, abused and abducted children,
due to the incorrect, behaviour and procedures of judges of Lower Saxony
in cases of international child abduction and boycott of access.
Hereby the official complaint against judge Kuhlmann of the higher
regional court of Oldenburg with disciplinary measures and dismissal from
office is entered at the justice ministry of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to assist and support correctly and effectively the district
court of Wilhelmshaven in ordering the following touring exhibitions for
the delay at least of one month to the district court of Wilhelmshaven and
to the higher regional court of Wilhelmshaven by exhibition exchange six
months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in the name of the German
people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War mööt
wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia in the state hospital
and nursing home/mental institution Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven (1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners under National
Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the City of Oldenburg
during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the region of Oldenburg
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of
the present document is two weeks.
Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
In the German history of international child abduction the proceedings of
judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony have already
a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice
and due to certain traditional family law practices. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to include a paragraph against child abduction and boycott of
access in the Constitution of the Land of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to establish an independent enquête committee of the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony on Judiciary Crimes against Humanity by the practice
of German family jurisdiction effected by judicial and social authorities
of the Land of Lower Saxony.
The case of Ewald Schlitt and the "disenfranchised judges" (Consult the annex
Pages 111-114; The Lexicon of Judicial Errors) portrays two fundamental aspects
of the Nazi judiciary, that are once again to be found today in the realm
of family law jurisprudence on the functional level of the procedural techniques
and of the judicial-political behaviour pattern as documented in the current
case of international child abduction at the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
at the regional court of Oldenburg and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
--- the totally exaggerated judgements, that are deliberately violating the
interstate legal regulations and guidelines
--- the political instrumentalisation of the judiciary, as a result of deliberate
Non-resistance by German jurists as functionaries of the state in definite
contrast to being functionaries of the citizens
a) In the case Ewald Schlitt (1942) the regional court of Oldenburg arrives
at a decision that deliberately exceeds the legal requirements.
Hitler and Goebbels are using this legal case for their own political objectives
and arrange via the secretary of state Freisler a deliberate manipulation
of file and proceedings, to achieve the politically prior determined death
sentence.
The competent responsible regional court of Oldenburg offers no resistance
against the manipulation of the court proceedings ordered by Hitler.
Hitler now has his precedent to carry out what he has long planned for. At
the session of the Reichstag (parliament) of the 26 April 1942 showered
with applause he shouted out:
>> I expect, the German judiciary to understand, that the nation is
not there for the sake of the judiciary, but that the judiciary is there
for their sake of the nation <<
>> From now on I will intervene in these cases and judges who apparently
do not recognise the command will be relieved of their office!<<
Following this speech, the Reichstag arrived at a corresponding decision.
For the first time in the history of the civilised world judges were expendable
without legal recourse.
(Consult the annex page 113-114; ; The Lexicon of Judicial errors)
The competent and responsible regional court of Oldenburg keeps silent.
The competent and responsible regional court of Oldenburg thereby tolerates
the direct political intervention in the so called " independent " German
judiciary.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional court of Oldenburg,
the higher regional court of Oldenburg have deliberately not name the judges,
directors and presidents, who have stood up against Adolf Hitler.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional court of Oldenburg,
the higher regional court of Oldenburg have deliberately not name the judges,
directors and the presidents, who demonstrated moral courage as German jurists
could, and who would rather be sent to concentration camps than to be subjected
to the political instrumentalisation of the German judiciary.
b) On the functional level of the procedural techniques and of the judicial-political
behaviour pattern as documented in the current case of international child
abduction at the district court of Wilhelmshaven, at the regional court of
Oldenburg (responsible for complaints to the supervision authorities against
judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven) and at the higher regional
court of Oldenburg (responsible for complaints and appeal against the district
court of Wilhelmshaven) the following aspects are documented.
--- the totally exaggerated judgements, that are deliberately violating the
interstate legal regulations and guidelines
--- the political instrumentalisation of the judiciary, as a result of deliberate
Non-resistance by German jurists as functionaries of the state in definite
contrast to being functionaries of the citizens
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional court of Oldenburg
do not document openly and with transparency, if possibly and under circumstances
there exists a kind of collision of interests between on the one hand, the
official independence of judges and on the other hand, the objective fact
that the legal representation Dr. Uwe Biester with the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester
occupies a political/judicial position at the ministry of justice with the
government of Lower Saxony and has thereby at the judiciary evaluation office
(Justizprüfungsamt) influence on judicial careers in Lower Saxony.
Until today it has not been correctly clarified in how far the socio-political
status of the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester can under circumstances have an influence
on proceedings at German judicial authorities like at the district court
of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg in which the
legal representation Dr. Uwe Biester participates.
The objective fact is that within the present proceedings at the district
court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg on international
child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access, in which
the legal representation of Dr. Uwe Biester is involved, irregularities in
procedural requirements occur as repeatedly documented. Like the undue delay
of proceedings and the non-enforcement of court ordered access with the children
abducted to Germany.
In addition to a political/judicial position at the with the government of
Lower Saxony on the regional level, the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester also occupies
at the city council of Wilhelmshaven on the local level.
Until today it has not been correctly clarified in how far the socio-political
status of the advocate and member of the city council Dr. Uwe Biester can
under circumstances have an influence on proceedings at German social and
administrative authorities like at the Children Welfare Office of Wilhelmshaven
and at the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven, which are involved in family
law proceedings at the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
The objective fact is that within the present proceedings at the district
court of Wilhelmshaven on international child abduction to Germany and the
resulting boycott of access, in which the Children Welfare Office of Wilhelmshaven
and the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven are involved, irregularities
in procedural requirements occur as repeatedly documented. Like the attempt
to deport the foreign left-behind parent from Germany before the decision
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven on the arbitrary denial of access
is published on access which never has taken place before because the court
ordered access with the children abducted to Germany has deliberately not
been enforced over the preceding deliberate undue delay of proceedings for
the period of one year.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional court of Oldenburg,
the higher regional court of Oldenburg document silence on the situation
just described.
The competent and responsible courts of Wilhelmshaven and of Oldenburg document
in the complaints to the supervision authority and in the complaint proceedings
against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court in Wilhelmshaven,
that the regional court of Oldenburg and the higher regional court of Oldenburg
do not stand up against the legal representation Dr. Uwe Biester and thereby
tolerate and support the political infringement on the so called "independent"
German judiciary.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to dismiss the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester immediately from his
political offices at the government of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to officially recommend to the competent bar association to
revoke the admittance to the bar of the attorney Dr. Uwe Biester.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to assist and support correctly and effectively the district
court of Wilhelmshaven in ordering the following touring exhibitions for
the delay at least of one month to the district court of Wilhelmshaven by
exhibition exchange every six months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in the name of the German
people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War mööt
wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia in the state hospital
and nursing home/mental institution Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven (1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners under National
Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the City of Oldenburg
during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the region of Oldenburg
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to pay reparations to the federal organisation of the victims
of euthanasia in accordance with the federal law on reparations on the victims
of national socialist persecution (BEG) and to offer research budgets with
the amount of 250 000 EURO.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to establish an independent enquête committee of the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony on the incidents of pseudo-patients and psychiatry
victims in the
nursing home/mental institution Wehnen.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to immediately close mental institution Wehnen.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to include a paragraph against child abduction and boycott of
access in the Constitution of the Land of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official demand is entered to publish the present petitions and
the respective conclusive recommendations in a publication of the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony as well as on the activities of the petition
committee at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of
the present document is two weeks.
Dear Mr. Eberhard Menzel, mayor of Wilhelmshaven,
thank you very much for your letter from 02.09.2003 in which you speak out
against the Nazi injustice system.
Zu diesen Anträgen möchte ich Ihnen mitteilen, dass in der Stadt
Wilhelmshaven bereits in angemessener Weise mit dem Gedenken an die Opfer
des Nazi-Unrechtsregimes umgegangen wird.
As repeatedly documented the petitioner and father of the child openly speaks
out against the re-activation of the body of thought of national socialism
within the Federal Republic of Germany inclusively the working methods of
Nazi-jurists.
As repeatedly documented the petitioner and father of the child openly speaks
out against injustice systems and against propaganda material which is destined
by its content to continue the intentions of former national socialist organisations.
As documented the petitioner and father of the child has been confirmed and
supported in his democratic, constitutional and human rights orientation,
in his socio-political approaches and initiatives on 02.09.03 by the mayor
of the city of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel.
Thank you very much for your acceptance to support financially the public
relations work for a more humane society with the example of exhibitions
on German Judiciary Crimes against Humanity at the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
Sofern das Amtsgericht um finanzielle Hilfe für tatsächliche Ausstellungen
nachsuchen würde, würde die Stadt sich dem sicherlich nicht verschließen,
soweit es ihre finanzielle Lage zulässt.
Unfortunately, the respective official to the district court of Wilhelmshaven
have not been answered until today so that for the time being a positive
stance can not be reported to you.
It may be put into question if this is based on seemingly general and partially
politically motivated slowness of judicial processing or on a basic refusal
and dislike of a certain legal policy attitudes to face history and wrongdoing.
You can be assured, that regardless of the reasons for the delay the work
from this side will continue on the present subject matter and problem with
accompanying judicial and political initiatives, so that there is some hope,
to report to you in a more or less near future about the reactions of the
competent and responsible jurists.
If there should be a positive reaction to the respective official demands
to the district court of Wilhelmshaven, you will be immediately informed.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of
the present document is two weeks.
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Arenhoevel,
chairman of the German Association of judges,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the German Association of judges,
Hereby the official demand is entered at the German association of judges
for official stances on the practised and documented leitkultur of German
family judges and on the democracy-constitutionality philosophy of the German
association of judges in the German judicial reality.
In fact, the present questions are of crucial importance within the socio-political
and legal policy context of German history, resulting from the documentation
of the history of the present proceedings.
Within the socio-political and legal policy context of German history, among
others the following basic questions have to be reflected and answered:
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to effect
a "real independent, voluntary self control and self monitoring"?
Is the credo of the Nazi-jurists' ideals of "Acquittal for their own purposes"
and "There is honour among thieves" still valid during the century following
the Nazi-terror?
Is the systematic self-acquittal for own purposes with writing in the style
of Persilscheine still en vogue in Germany?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to guarantee
that all humans independent from sex, nationality and status are equal before
the law?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to act
against the economic dependence and political dependence which the Association
of German judges has described within its press releases?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to prove
that within the political judicial reality of the so-called Federal Republic
of Germany, Germany has no longer a Fuehrer and Germany is no longer a Fuehrer
state?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to prove
that the German judiciary will not let itself get instrumentalised for the
political persecution of children rights and human rights activist?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to prove
that the German authorities can serve the humans and not that the Human Material
has to serve the German authorities?
Does the herein documented behaviour and proceedings of German family judges
correspond to the quality standard of German judge's performance promoted
by the Association of German judges?
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of
the present document is two weeks.
Michael Hickman
Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur
on the situation of
Human Rights in Germany
to the United Nations and
to the European Institutions
|
|