Michael Hickman
Wilhelmshaven
Amtsgericht Wilhelmshaven
Direktor Kahlen
Stellvertretender Direktor Schröder
Rechtsantragsstelle
Marktstraße 15-17
26382 Wilhelmshaven
04421 408 117
Dr. Busch, Frau Bakker, Herr Wessels, Frau Ballnus
Justizministerium Niedersachsen
Justice ministry of Lower Saxony
Beschwerdezyklus AKTENZEICHEN 4121 E -S4. 54/03 und AKTENZEICHEN 3700 E
- 204.37/03
Am Waterloo Platz 1
30169 Hannover
poststelle@mj.niedersachsen.de
The South African President
Mr. T.M. Mbeki
Office of the President
Private Bag X1000
Pretoria 0001
President@po.gov.za
|
Marita Sehn
Anke Schwarzbäck
Petition Committee at the German Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss des deutschen Bundestages
Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
marita.sehn@bundestag.de
klaus.hagemann@bundestag.de
Wolfgang Thierse
President of the German federal parliament
Präsident des Deutschen Bundestages
Personal Referent
Persönlicher Referent
Wolfram Kolodziej-Derfert
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
wolfgang.thierse@bundestag.de
praesident@bundestag.de
South African Embassy
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin
botschaft@suedafrika.org
|
26 August 2003
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German
parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee at the German
federal parliament,
With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition proceedings
at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630 the herein documented
events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven are indicated as further proof
for the establishing of an independent enquête committee on the judiciary
crimes against humanity by the practice of German family law jurisdiction.
Why there are written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively invalid
for a certain population groups due to sex, status, and nationality out of
political motivation ?
FILE NUMBER
16 F 229/03 UG
URGENT !
PLEASE, PUT FORWARD IMMEDIATELY!
Does the district court of Wilhelmshaven officially recommend criminal proceedings
against the
Justice minister of Lower Saxony Elisabeth Heister-Neumann and against the
German federal minister of justice Brigitte Zypries due to deception in legal
proceedings, misuse of authority, etc. ?
The following criminal charges were entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven
in accordance with the official guidelines of the German federal ministry
of justice (FILE NUMBER R B 3 - zu: 9311/22-2-23 335/2033 from 14 April 2003)
as well in accordance with the official guidelines of the justice ministry
of Lower Saxony (FILE NUMBER 4121 E -S4. 54/03 from 11 February 2003 and
from 1 August 2003) :
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 01.08.03.
Criminal charges against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code. § 263 deception in legal
proceedings, § 339 misuse of authority, deliberate deception of participants
in the proceedings by deliberately re-naming participants of proceedings
participating in the court hearing from 21.05.2003 for advantaging
participants of proceedings by the German family law judge Staubwasser of
the district court of Wilhelmshaven
At the same time the legal demand was entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven
to refrain from the attempt to commit possible criminal offences like obstruction
of justice in office under misuse of authority.
Nevertheless on 01.08.03 FILE NUMBER 313 E, Mr. Schroeder, deputy director
of the district court of Wilhemshaven expresses his personal political opinion
that he will not process the criminal charges.
"As far as the placing of criminal charges is concerned, the district court
of Wilhelmshaven is not the responsible institution. Due to lack of competencies
I have not proceeded."
It can be supposed that Mr. Schröder with a good German judicial education
and as a German jurist he does his office work correctly. One would assume
that he knows exactly what he is doing, otherwise it would put into question
his position as deputy director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
On the one hand, the district court of Wilhelmshaven refuses to process the
criminal charges in accordance with the official statements by Mr. Schroeder,
the deputy director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
On the other hand, the district court has to process criminal charges in
accordance with the official statements of the German federal ministry of
justice as well as in accordance with the official statements of the ministry
of justice of Lower Saxony.
The documented crucial contradiction results in a legal insecurity within
the German judicial reality to which remedies have to be find by correctly
applied usual legal remedies.
It has to be verified, if under circumstances and in accordance with the
official statements by the deputy director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Mr. Schroeder the competent German federal justice minister Brigitte Zypries
and the competent justice minister of Lower Saxony Elisabeth Heister-Neumann
are deliberately making false declarations and thereby are committing as
German jurist in political offices deception in legal proceedings under misuse
of authority in cases of international child abduction.
Hereby the official legal demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven
to inform correctly within the delay of seven days if the district court
of Wilhelmshaven officially recommends criminal proceedings against the justice
minister of Lower Saxony Elisabeth Heister-Neumann and against the German
federal minister of justice Brigitte Zypries due to deception in legal proceedings,
misuse of authority, etc. or if even the district court of Wilhelmshaven
intends itself to apply respective legal remedies.
In addition, it is up to the district court of Wilhelmshaven to process correctly
the criminal charges already entered in accordance with the innerstate legal
guidelines and for example, to forward these criminal charges to the competent
prosecutor.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of applying
the working methods of the Nazi-jurists within the present legal matter
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from applying the
attempt of applying the working methods with the principles "There is honour
among thieves" and "Acquittal for their own purposes" of the Nazi-jurists
within the present legal matter.
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the systematic
self-acquittal for own purposes with writing in the style of Persilscheine.
Michael Hickman
Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur
on the situation of
Human Rights in Germany
to the United Nations and
to the European Institutions
|
|