| 16 September 2003
The official application to institute criminal proceedings
against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
on the grounds of kidnapping, child trafficking and the formation
of a criminal association with the German Family judge Staubwasser
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee
at the German federal parliament,
With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition
proceedings at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
the herein documented events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven
and at the regional court of Wilhelmshaven are indicated as
further proof for the establishing of an independent enquête
committee on the judiciary crimes against humanity by the
practice of German family law jurisdiction.
Why are there written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively
invalid for a certain population group due to sex, status,
and nationality out of political motivation?
The official application to institute criminal proceedings
against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
on the grounds of kidnapping, child trafficking and the formation
of a criminal association with the German Family judge Staubwasser
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Copy to the file 16 F 229/03 UG
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
15. September 2003
Reasoning:
Correctly founded rejection of judges due to bias
Judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
was rejected according to § 42 of the civil process regulations
(the right of rejection), due to the concern that he would
be biased. The rejection based on the grounds of mistrust
of the impartiality of judge Kuhlmann was justified based
on the documented case of international child abduction to
Germany and the resulting boycott of access.
The application the higher regional court of Oldenburg according
to §44 of the civil process regulations (application
of rejection) was made in accordance with the regulations
against judge Kuhlmann. The grounds for the rejection were
correctly made credible.
Consult the petition "Legalisation of boycott of access
in the wake of international child abduction by German authorities
by Germany" from 10. August 2003 to the higher regional
court of Oldenburg file number 14 UF 126/03 UG:
Rejection of judges of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
due to bias
From the tool-set of manipulation filters applied by German
authorities the higher regional court of Oldenburg with the
judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert chooses as already
documented for the manipulation of complaint proceedings the
specific tool of confirming and covering the incorrect proceedings
of the German family judge Staubwasser from the district court
of Wilhelmshaven by copying and duplicating these incorrect
proceedings.
The aim of these manipulation is to build up a wall of silence
around the political motivation by pushing away the circulating
responsibilities within the initial proceedings as well as
within the resulting complaint proceedings so that the judiciary
scandals are hidden and the incorrect proceedings are covered.
a) Decision of 15.08.2001 document number 16 F 605/00 UG by
the German family judge Dr. Bessel of the District Court of
Wilhelmshaven ordering contact between the children and father
of the children.
b) boycott of the court ordered contact on the 21.08.03 with
the help of third parties.
c) non-enforcement of the court order for access
d) undue delay of proceedings in child matters by the court
over a period of more than one year
e) 03.09.02 The broadcasting of the ARTE TV documentary (Theme
evening. War over children)
f) 04.09.02 FILE NUMBER 16 F 605/00 UG. Court hearing at the
district court of Wilhelmshaven. After undue delay of one
year at the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the German family
judge Staubwasser sets a delay for his decision taking, which
the German family judge Staubwasser deliberately exceeds.
g) Decision dated 04.10.02 FILE NUMBER 16 F 605/00 UG of the
German family law judge Staubwasser, which is only published
after official complaints against undue delay. Arbitrary denial
of access on access, which has not taken place over the period
of one year, whereas the court ordered access has not been
enforced by the court.
The judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher
regional court of Oldenburg engage in deliberate careless
consultation of the file as documented in the decision of
the higher regional court of Oldenburg on this part of the
proceedings' history.
The judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher
regional court of Oldenburg they are responsible by deliberately
covering their German jurist colleague, i.e., the German family
judge Staubwasser from the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
for the practised and documented leitkultur at the district
court of Wilhelmshaven within the German family law policy
(see Section 5a, 5b1, 5b2, 5c).
Hereby the official legal demand is entered for rejection
of the judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher
regional court of Oldenburg due to bias.
Deliberate violation of the civil procedure regulations
by judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
The higher regional court of Oldenburg has documented
with the decision 01.09.03, postmark 04.09.03, file number
14 F 126/03 UG considerable irregularities in respect to the
procedural requirements in the case at hand of international
child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access.
The rejected judge, judge Kuhlmann has under breach of duty
and violation of §44 civil procedural regulations deliberately
ignored to answer the reasons for rejection. The applicant
has deliberately not been informed by the higher regional
court of Oldenburg about the statement of the rejected judge
Kuhlmann which are mandatory duty.
Under the violation of § 48 civil procedural regulations
judge Kuhlmann has deliberately not informed the higher regional
court of Oldenburg, competent for the demand of rejection,
that judge Kuhlmann informs about circumstances, compare the
explanations under 1 a), which could justify a rejection or
that due to other reason judge Kuhlmann should be excluded
in accordance with legal guidelines.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that judge
Kuhlmann is deliberately ignoring the application for rejection
on the grounds of bias. In addition, judge Kuhlmann is simultaneously
violating the civil procedural regulations in his decision
whereas judge Kuhlmann himself quotes the civil procedural
regulations.
Deliberate violations of the legal demand to refrain from
the attempt to incite the petitioner to committing the criminal
offence of trafficking of child and humans
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional
court of Oldenburg have documented in the case concerned of
international child abduction to Germany that, the applicant,
the foreign left behind father, who has kidnapped no children,
has not legalised child abduction, neither has he participated
in child trafficking or has he legalised child trafficking.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg has correctly been
informed about the legal demand to refrain from the attempt
to incite the petitioner to committing the criminal offence
of child trafficking.
Consult the petition "Legalisation of boycott of access
in the wake of international child abduction by German authorities
by Germany" from 10. August 2003 to the higher regional
court of Oldenburg file number 14 UF 126/03 UG.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner
of the child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from
the attempt to incite the petitioner and father of the child
to acts of criminal offences in trafficking of children and
humans by intentionally generating turnover and profit of
judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German
authorities in child abduction, boycott of access and misuse
of authority.
Nevertheless, the higher regional court of Oldenburg documents
that, judge Kuhlmann, who is deliberately ignoring the rejection
application due to bias, handed in correctly, simultaneously
violates the civil procedural regulations, compare the explanation
given under 1a) and 1b), and takes a decision in which judge
Kuhlmann imposes costs on the applicant, the foreign left
behind father, who does not kidnapped children, who does not
legalise child abduction, who neither participates in child
trafficking nor legalises child trafficking.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that judge
Kuhlmann deliberately abuses FGG 13a, to discriminate against
and to disadvantage the foreign left behind father, as FGG
13a only represent a "can " and not a "must"
provision.
With the imposition of costs on the parent who has acted legally,
who as documented does not resort to take the law into his
own hands, does not kidnap children to gain advantage for
himself and to influence decisions in custody cases, judge
Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg intends
purposefully to complicate the realisation of the rights of
the bi-national children and their foreign left-behind parent.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that judge
Kuhlmann is of the personal political view, that in cases
of international child abduction to Germany, the foreign left
behind victim parent and the foreign left behind environment
must pay the court costs for the legal proceedings on access
with the children brought to Germany. Even as documented in
the present case where access ordered by the court in Germany
is deliberately not enforced over a period of more than one
year.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents in the case
concerned, that the legal policy acting of judge Kuhlmann
in the judicial reality has nothing whatsoever to do with
the term " the wellbeing of the child," but that
"the German wellbeing of the child" as within the
practised family law policy by judge Kuhlmann of the higher
regional court of Oldenburg represents only a ostensible reason
presented and a placeholder for "economic" and "political"
interests that are hostile to the wellbeing of the child.
The regional court of Oldenburg has documented in the case
at hand, that judge Kuhlmann from the higher regional court
of Oldenburg intends that family law proceedings and decisions
for access which are deliberately not enforced, are to be
financed by not only the foreign left-behind parent and environments
but also by the German tax money.
As documented at the higher regional court of Oldenburg, judge
Kuhlmann from the regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert
engages in his political aim of self-acquittal in writing
in the style of Persilscheine whereas there is a wide gap
between the social reality and the constructed, theoretical
judicial reality.
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional
court of Oldenburg have documented in the case concerned of
international child abduction to Germany that the applicant
and foreign left behind father does not kidnap children, does
legalise child abduction, and does neither legalise nor engage
in child trafficking.
By means of legalising child abduction and the abuse and exploitation
of children in child trafficking turnover and profit for the
German judicial business shall be generated.
The official application is made to the director of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven Kahlen to institute criminal proceedings
against judge Kuhlmann of higher regional court of Oldenburg
Hereby the legal demand is entered at the district court of
Wilhelmshaven and to Mr. Kahlen, director of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven, to correctly process complete criminal
charges against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg. The usual judicial delay of two weeks is to
be observed, in order to notify the applicant of receipt of
the present document and of the allocated file number. Should
this legal matter be forwarded by the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
the appropriate copies of all documentation with entry and
forwarding confirmation together with the present complete
documentation and the respective exit stamp are to be correctly
sent as well to the applicant for documenting the administrative
act by the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare
the explanations in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c), and
in accordance with the official guidelines of the Federal
justice ministry (file number R B 3 - to: 9311/22-2-23 335/2033
from 14. April 2003) as well as in accordance with the official
guidelines of the justice ministry of Lower Saxony. (File
number 4121 E -S4. 54/03 from 11.02.2003 and from 01. August
2003), criminal charges against judge Kuhlmann of the higher
regional court of Oldenburg are directly entered at the district
court of Wilhelmshaven as well as to the politically and morally
responsible director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Mr. Kahlen on the grounds of kidnapping § 235 German
criminal code and of child trafficking § 236 German criminal
code. Thereby it has to be examined via the proper legal action,
whether judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
is under circumstances deliberately engaging in committing
the criminal offences mentioned earlier.
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare
the explanations in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c) and
in accordance with the official guidelines of the Federal
justice ministry (file number R B 3 - to: 9311/22-2-23 335/2033
from 14. April 2003) as well as in accordance with the official
guidelines of the justice ministry of Lower Saxony. (File
number 4121 E -S4. 54/03 from 11.02.2003 and from 01. August
2003), criminal charges against judge Kuhlmann of the higher
regional court of Oldenburg are directly entered at the district
court of Wilhelmshaven as well as to the politically and morally
responsible director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Mr. Kahlen on the grounds of formation of criminal conspiracy
§ 129 German criminal code. Thereby it has to be examined
via the proper legal action, whether judge Kuhlmann of the
higher regional court of Oldenburg is under the circumstances
deliberately engaging in committing the criminal offences
mentioned earlier. The criminal offence of criminal conspiracy
with the German family judge Staubwasser from the district
court of Wilhelmshaven is to be examined via the regular legal
action separately in each and every single charge already
entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven against the
family judge Staubwasser. In accordance with the statements
of the deputy director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Mr. Schroeder from 18.08.03 and from 27.08.03 FILE NUMBER
313E, the criminal charges listed in the following have already
been forwarded from the district court of Wilhelmshaven to
the competent office of the public prosecutor. by.
--- 5 pages documentation and presentation of evidence
from the 30.07.03. criminal charges against employees of the
district court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code §267
falsification of documents, §269 falsification of proof
relevant data, violation of procedural requirements and irregularities
by violating the right to a fair trial.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of
the 31.07.03. criminal charges against the German family judge
Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German
criminal code § 202 violation of postal secret, §
202a espionage of data, § 267 falsification of documents,
§ 269 falsification of proof relevant data, § 274
burking of documents. Indicating a document in the decision
as so-called proof material without providing the source and
origin as well as deliberate refusal of verification of the
document's by the German family judge Staubwasser of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven against official legal demands
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of
the 01.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family judge
Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German
criminal code. § 263 deception in legal proceedings,
§ 339 misuse of authority, deliberate deception of participants
in the proceedings by deliberately re-naming participants
of proceedings participating in the court hearing from 21.05.2003
for advantaging
participants of proceedings by the German family law judge
Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
--- 6 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of
the 03.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family court
judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven:
German criminal code: § 153 false declaration under oath,
§ 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 misuse
of authority, § 269 falsification of proof relevant data,
§ 274 burking of documents, § 348 false documented
statements in office. Deliberate false declarations on the
documentation of the petitioner, the status of the file in
the legal case and deliberate burking of documents by violating
the right to fair trial by rejecting of offered evidence given
by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of
the 04.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family law
judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven:
German criminal code: § 235 child abduction, § 263
deception in legal proceedings, § 339 Misuse of authority,
§ StGB 269 falsifying of proof relevant data. Deliberate
false declarations on the documented proceedings of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven in the social reality as well as in
judicially constructed reality by the German family judge
Staubwasser of the district court of in the presented case
of international child abduction to Germany and the resulting
boycott of access since 1995.
--- 9 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of
the 05.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family law
judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
German criminal code: § 239a Erpresserischer Menschenraub,
§ 240 Coercion, § 241 threatening, § 241a political
persecution, § 263 deception in legal proceedings, §
339 misuse of authority. Deliberate coercion of the petitioner
and father of the child under violation of freedom of speech
with the intention of the German family judge Staubwasser
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, to blackmail, threat
and intimidate with the threat and coercion to prevent the
access to the children, if the petitioner and father of the
child is complaining in public and in the media about the
incorrect proceedings of German judicial and social authorities
of Wilhelmshaven in family law proceedings on international
child abduction to Germany, whereas the German family judge
Staubwasser is engaging in the political persecution of children
rights and human rights activists.
--- 9 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of
the 06.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family law
judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven:
German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate
slandering, § 187 slandering. Deliberate insult, defamation
and discrediting of the petitioner and father of the child
and deliberate biased proceedings by the German family law
judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven as
intentional distraction from the incorrect proceedings of
the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of
the 07.08.03. Criminal charges against the family law judge
Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German
criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate slandering,
§ 187 slandering, § 189 deliberate insult of the
memorial of deceased. deliberate insult of the memorial of
deceased, here the foreign left behind grandfather of the
children brought to Germany in family law proceedings by the
German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven in the present case of international child
abduction and the resulting boycott of access
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of
the 07.08.03. Criminal charges against the family court judge
Staubwasser of the district court in Wilhelmshaven: German
criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate slandering,
§ 187 slandering, $ 189. Deliberate slandering, defamation
and discrediting of the binational children participating
in the proceedings in the present case of international child
abduction and the resulting boycott of access by the German
family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
--- 20 pages documentation and presentation of evidence from
08.08.03. Criminal charges against the family court judge
Staubwasser of the district court in Wilhelmshaven: German
criminal code: § 83 preparation of high treason, §
86 distribution of propaganda material of organisations violating
the German constitution, § 132 pretending office titles,
§ 211 preparation and attempt of judiciary murder, §
234 Trafficking of humans, § 235 child abduction, §
239 preparation and attempt of deprivation of freedom, §
241a political persecution. Preparation of high treason and
as well as distribution of propaganda material of organisations
violating the German constitution for protection and propaganda
reasons of German crimes against humanity, while with the
pretension of office titles preparation and attempt of deprivation
of freedom and judiciary murder is effected in order to promote
the political persecution of children rights and human rights
activists while the illegal legalisation of trafficking of
humans and child abduction is used for the coercion and blackmailing
of the petitioner and father of the child in the present case
of international child abduction and the resulting boycott
of access.
Therefore it has to be examined via the proper legal channels
judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg together
with the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven have engaged in the formation of a criminal
conspiracy, whereas the pursuit of which appears after considering
all circumstances as unacceptable as it is against the basic
values of a state order that respects human dignity. In addition,
it has to be clarified who plays a leading role and who works
in the background of the criminal conspiracy for the legalisation
of international child abduction and boycott of access in
respect to abuse and exploitation of children within the child
trafficking of the German judicial business.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of applying the
working methods of the Nazi-jurists within the present legal
matter
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain
from the attempt of applying the working methods with the
principles "There is honour among thieves" and "Acquittal
for their own purposes" of the Nazi-jurists within the
present legal matter.
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from
the systematic self-acquittal for own purposes with writing
in the style of Persilscheine.
Legal demand for expeditious proceedings
Especially, as the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder
had expeditious proceedings even against the free press in
the legal matter "coloured hair" before the culminating
point of the election campaign 2002 whereas proceedings on
child abduction, boycott of access, violation of custody,
misuse of authority, and German crimes against Humanity are
deliberately delayed and are deliberately not correctly processed.
It is supposed that the German "independent, non-political
and non-corrupt" judiciary as represented here by the
district court of Wilhelmshaven has a clear understanding
of the value of legal goods "coloured hairs vs. Children
and Humans."
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the
petitioner of the child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain
from the attempt to incite the petitioner and father of the
child to acts of criminal offences in trafficking of children
and humans by intentionally generating turnover and profit
of judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German
authorities in child abduction, boycott of access and misuse
of authority.
Legal delay
The district court of Wilhelmshaven has the usual legal
delay of two weeks to inform the petitioner about the entry
of the present document and the file number of the present
legal matter.
Dear Mr. Kahlen, director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
Dear Mr. Schroeder, deputy director of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven,
As the moral and political directors of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven you are certainly interested in a praiseworthy
manner to proof that you personally have broken with the fatal
continuity of the working methods of the Nazi-Jurists in the
judicial reality of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The self-acquittal of the Judiciary is an incident with
many participants, which links the history of the federal
republic to the history of the Third Reich.
The Post of Gdansk
History of a German Judicial Murder
It is documented that the main denazification committee
of the district of Oldenburg promoted among others on 22.2.1949
the career of the Nazi-Jurist Dr. Bode within the Federal
Republic of Germany, who had taken part in the judicial murder
of Gdansk.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your
action pattern of responsible German jurists has to be definitely
supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district court
of Wilhelmshaven, to open a memorial at the entrance to the
district court of Wilhelmshaven that names the Nazi-Jurists
who were active in Hitler's regime who later made careers
in the Federal Republic of Germany, in particular in the region
of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg
Your personal stance of moral courage is welcomed to distance
yourself in public from, what has been documented by world
history on the German terror judiciary. Certainly, you are
aware in your daily business how easily the German judiciary
is to be abused as an instrument of terror with manipulation
of files and proceedings to match politically predetermined
court decisions. Your sincere approach as German jurists to
learn your lessons from that for your legal policy interpretations
and your legal policy practising within the German Federal
Republic of Germany is definitely welcomed.
It is to be assumed, that you personally as decent, respectable
Germans, additionally as German jurists in political offices,
will have no problems at all with facing and coming to terms
with the past of the German judicial history and that you
correctly and with good will, transparency and honest enlightenment
and clarification of facts stand up as a trend-setting good
example for humanity, human rights and democracy within the
judicial reality of the German Federal Republic of Germany.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your
action pattern of responsible German jurists has to be definitely
supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district court
of Wilhelmshaven to order the following touring exhibitions
for the delay at least of one month to the district court
of Wilhelmshaven by exhibition exchange every six months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in
the name of the German people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War
mööt wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia
in the state hospital and nursing home/mental institution
Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven
(1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme
of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners
under National Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the
City of Oldenburg during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the
region of Oldenburg
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district
court of Wilhelmshaven, to open a memorial that names the
German Jurists in the region of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg
who have stood up against Adolf Hitler in front of the memorial
at the entrance to the district court of Wilhelmshaven that
names the Nazi-Jurists who were active in Hitler's regime
who later made careers in the Federal Republic of Germany,
in particular in the region of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg.
Your personal stance of moral courage is welcomed to distance
yourself in public from, what has been documented by world
history on the German terror judiciary. Certainly, you are
aware in your daily business how easily the German judiciary
is to be abused as an instrument of terror with manipulation
of files and proceedings to match politically predetermined
court decisions. Your sincere approach as German jurists to
learn your lessons from that for your legal policy interpretations
and your legal policy practising within the German Federal
Republic of Germany is definitely welcomed.
The praiseworthy approach not only to name German jurists
without backbone but also to name the jurists of Wilhelmshaven
and Oldenburg, who demonstrated moral courage as German jurists,
and who would rather be sent to concentration camps than to
be subjected to the political instrumentalisation of the German
judiciary, is welcomed.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about
the entry of the present document is two weeks.
The official complaint to the supervision authority judge
Kuhlmann of the regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert for
the violation of the right to a fair trial and the right to
be heard to the justice ministry of Lower Saxony
Dear Mr. Kramer, president of the higher regional court of
Oldenburg,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the higher regional court of Oldenburg,
As the moral and political president of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg you are certainly interested in a praiseworthy
manner to proof that you personally have broken with the fatal
continuity of the working methods of the Nazi-Jurists in the
judicial reality of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The self-acquittal of the Judiciary is an incident with
many participants, which links the history of the federal
republic to the history of the Third Reich.
The Post of Gdansk
History of a German Judicial Murder
It is documented that the main denazification committee
of the district of Oldenburg promoted among others on 22.2.1949
the career of the Nazi-Jurist Dr. Bode within the Federal
Republic of Germany, who had taken part in the judicial murder
of Gdansk.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your
action pattern of responsible German jurists has to be definitely
supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the higher regional
court of Oldenburg an the morally and politically responsible
president Kramer, to work on special exhibition about character
pattern, misuse of authority, and abuse of power by German
judges in the Hitler-Regime, which can serve as a touring
exhibition as a presentation to the public at the higher regional
court of Oldenburg as well as at other German courts.
The official inauguration should take place in the foyer of
the higher regional court of Oldenburg, whereas the general
overview and the basic thoughts of the touring exhibition
should be available as a permanent exhibition in the foyer
of the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
The suggestions for the base thoughts are : independence and
moral courage of German judges as well as the acting of German
judges under the tension on the one hand of state ideologies,
political influence and on the other hand of humans humanity
and human rights departing from the case Ewald Schlitt (see
section explanations in 4c1) in this respect), Hitler's political
instrumentalisation of the German judiciary as well as resistance
respectively non-resistance of German jurists against Hitler
and against political instrumentalisation of the German judiciary.
Dear Mrs. Silke Osterthun from the higher regional court
of Oldenburg,
thank you very much for your correct email-confirmation for
the entry of the complaints to the supervision authority against
judge Bartels and judge Schubert from the higher regional
court of Oldenburg.
Dienstaufsichtbeschwerden vom 04.09.2003 und 07.09.2003:
Sehr geehrter Herr Hickmann,
hiermit bestätige ich den Eingang Ihrer Dienstaufsichtbeschwerde
gegen Richter Bartels vom 04.09.2003 und den Eingang Ihrer
Dienstaufsichtbeschwerde gegen Richter Schubert vom
07.09.2003.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Im Auftrag
Dr. Oehlers
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare
the explanations in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c), the
complaint to the supervision authority with disciplinary measures
and dismissal from office is entered against the judge Kuhlmann
of the higher regional court of Oldenburg at the higher regional
court of Oldenburg on grounds of violations of the right of
fair trial and the right to be heard.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about
the entry of the present document is two weeks.
Dear Dr. Busch, Mrs. Bakker, Mr. Wessels, Mrs. Ballnus,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony,
In the German history of international child abduction the
proceedings of judicial, social and administrative authorities
of Lower Saxony already have a fixed famous place due to their
documented low conscience of injustice and due to certain
traditional family law practice. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction
have already provoked the intervention of the French President
Jacques Chirac and the US-President Bill Clinton.
With reference to the complaint cycle document number 4121
E -S4. 54/03 and document number 3700 E - 204.37/03, official
demand is made to the justice Ministry of Lower Saxony in
respect of the official stance of the Justice Ministry of
Lower Saxony as to the amount of voluntary reparations payments
that the Justice Ministry of lower Saxony is prepared to recommend
to the Land of Lower Saxony to pay to the UN-Children's Rights
Commission, to UNICEF, to the Commissioner for Human Rights
at the European Parliament, project for the Protection of
Human Rights, as well as national and international NGO's
active in the field of missing, exploited, abused and abducted
children, due to the incorrect, behaviour and procedures of
judges of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction
and boycott of access.
Hereby the official complaint against judge Kuhlmann of the
higher regional court of Oldenburg with disciplinary measures
and dismissal from office is entered at the justice ministry
of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to assist and support correctly
and effectively the district court of Wilhelmshaven in ordering
the following touring exhibitions for the delay at least of
one month to the district court of Wilhelmshaven and to the
higher regional court of Wilhelmshaven by exhibition exchange
six months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in
the name of the German people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War
mööt wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia
in the state hospital and nursing home/mental institution
Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven
(1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme
of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners
under National Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the
City of Oldenburg during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the
region of Oldenburg
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least
about the entry of the present document is two weeks.
Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
In the German history of international child abduction the
proceedings of judicial, social and administrative authorities
of Lower Saxony have already a fixed famous place due to their
documented low conscience of injustice and due to certain
traditional family law practices. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction
have already provoked the intervention of the French President
Jacques Chirac and the US-President Bill Clinton.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to include a paragraph against
child abduction and boycott of access in the Constitution
of the Land of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to establish an independent enquête
committee of the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony on
Judiciary Crimes against Humanity by the practice of German
family jurisdiction effected by judicial and social authorities
of the Land of Lower Saxony.
The case of Ewald Schlitt and the "disenfranchised judges"
(Consult the annex Pages 111-114; The Lexicon of Judicial
Errors) portrays two fundamental aspects of the Nazi judiciary,
that are once again to be found today in the realm of family
law jurisprudence on the functional level of the procedural
techniques and of the judicial-political behaviour pattern
as documented in the current case of international child abduction
at the district court of Wilhelmshaven, at the regional court
of Oldenburg and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
--- the totally exaggerated judgements, that are deliberately
violating the interstate legal regulations and guidelines
--- the political instrumentalisation of the judiciary, as
a result of deliberate Non-resistance by German jurists as
functionaries of the state in definite contrast to being functionaries
of the citizens
a) In the case Ewald Schlitt (1942) the regional court of
Oldenburg arrives at a decision that deliberately exceeds
the legal requirements.
Hitler and Goebbels are using this legal case for their own
political objectives and arrange via the secretary of state
Freisler a deliberate manipulation of file and proceedings,
to achieve the politically prior determined death sentence.
The competent responsible regional court of Oldenburg offers
no resistance against the manipulation of the court proceedings
ordered by Hitler.
Hitler now has his precedent to carry out what he has long
planned for. At the session of the Reichstag (parliament)
of the 26 April 1942 showered with applause he shouted out:
>> I expect, the German judiciary to understand, that
the nation is not there for the sake of the judiciary, but
that the judiciary is there for their sake of the nation <<
>> From now on I will intervene in these cases and judges
who apparently do not recognise the command will be relieved
of their office! <<
Following this speech, the Reichstag arrived at a corresponding
decision. For the first time in the history of the civilised
world judges were expendable without legal recourse.
(Consult the annex page 113-114; ; The Lexicon of Judicial
errors)
The competent and responsible regional court of Oldenburg
keeps silent.
The competent and responsible regional court of Oldenburg
thereby tolerates the direct political intervention in the
so called " independent " German judiciary.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional
court of Oldenburg, the higher regional court of Oldenburg
have deliberately not name the judges, directors and presidents,
who have stood up against Adolf Hitler.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional
court of Oldenburg, the higher regional court of Oldenburg
have deliberately not name the judges, directors and the presidents,
who demonstrated moral courage as German jurists could, and
who would rather be sent to concentration camps than to be
subjected to the political instrumentalisation of the German
judiciary.
b) On the functional level of the procedural techniques and
of the judicial-political behaviour pattern as documented
in the current case of international child abduction at the
district court of Wilhelmshaven, at the regional court of
Oldenburg (responsible for complaints to the supervision authorities
against judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven) and
at the higher regional court of Oldenburg (responsible for
complaints and appeal against the district court of Wilhelmshaven)
the following aspects are documented.
--- the totally exaggerated judgements, that are deliberately
violating the interstate legal regulations and guidelines
--- the political instrumentalisation of the judiciary, as
a result of deliberate Non-resistance by German jurists as
functionaries of the state in definite contrast to being functionaries
of the citizens
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional
court of Oldenburg do not document openly and with transparency,
if possibly and under circumstances there exists a kind of
collision of interests between on the one hand, the official
independence of judges and on the other hand, the objective
fact that the legal representation Dr. Uwe Biester with the
advocate Dr. Uwe Biester occupies a political/judicial position
at the ministry of justice with the government of Lower Saxony
and has thereby at the judiciary evaluation office (Justizprüfungsamt)
influence on judicial careers in Lower Saxony.
Until today it has not been correctly clarified in how far
the socio-political status of the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester
can under circumstances have an influence on proceedings at
German judicial authorities like at the district court of
Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg
in which the legal representation Dr. Uwe Biester participates.
The objective fact is that within the present proceedings
at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional
court of Oldenburg on international child abduction to Germany
and the resulting boycott of access, in which the legal representation
of Dr. Uwe Biester is involved, irregularities in procedural
requirements occur as repeatedly documented. Like the undue
delay of proceedings and the non-enforcement of court ordered
access with the children abducted to Germany.
In addition to a political/judicial position at the with the
government of Lower Saxony on the regional level, the advocate
Dr. Uwe Biester also occupies at the city council of Wilhelmshaven
on the local level.
Until today it has not been correctly clarified in how far
the socio-political status of the advocate and member of the
city council Dr. Uwe Biester can under circumstances have
an influence on proceedings at German social and administrative
authorities like at the Children Welfare Office of Wilhelmshaven
and at the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven, which are
involved in family law proceedings at the district court of
Wilhelmshaven.
The objective fact is that within the present proceedings
at the district court of Wilhelmshaven on international child
abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access,
in which the Children Welfare Office of Wilhelmshaven and
the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven are involved, irregularities
in procedural requirements occur as repeatedly documented.
Like the attempt to deport the foreign left-behind parent
from Germany before the decision of the district court of
Wilhelmshaven on the arbitrary denial of access is published
on access which never has taken place before because the court
ordered access with the children abducted to Germany has deliberately
not been enforced over the preceding deliberate undue delay
of proceedings for the period of one year.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional
court of Oldenburg, the higher regional court of Oldenburg
document silence on the situation just described.
The competent and responsible courts of Wilhelmshaven and
of Oldenburg document in the complaints to the supervision
authority and in the complaint proceedings against the German
family judge Staubwasser of the district court in Wilhelmshaven,
that the regional court of Oldenburg and the higher regional
court of Oldenburg do not stand up against the legal representation
Dr. Uwe Biester and thereby tolerate and support the political
infringement on the so called "independent" German
judiciary.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to dismiss the advocate Dr. Uwe
Biester immediately from his political offices at the government
of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to officially recommend to the
competent bar association to revoke the admittance to the
bar of the attorney Dr. Uwe Biester.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to assist and support correctly
and effectively the district court of Wilhelmshaven in ordering
the following touring exhibitions for the delay at least of
one month to the district court of Wilhelmshaven by exhibition
exchange every six months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in
the name of the German people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War
mööt wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia
in the state hospital and nursing home/mental institution
Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven
(1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme
of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners
under National Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the
City of Oldenburg during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the
region of Oldenburg
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to pay reparations to the federal
organisation of the victims of euthanasia in accordance with
the federal law on reparations on the victims of national
socialist persecution (BEG) and to offer research budgets
with the amount of 250 000 EURO.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to establish an independent enquête
committee of the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony on
the incidents of pseudo-patients and psychiatry victims in
the
nursing home/mental institution Wehnen.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to immediately close mental institution
Wehnen.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony to include a paragraph against
child abduction and boycott of access in the Constitution
of the Land of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official demand is entered to publish the present
petitions and the respective conclusive recommendations in
a publication of the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony
as well as on the activities of the petition committee at
the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about
the entry of the present document is two weeks.
Dear Mr. Eberhard Menzel, mayor of Wilhelmshaven,
thank you very much for your letter from 02.09.2003 in which
you speak out against the Nazi injustice system.
Zu diesen Anträgen möchte ich Ihnen mitteilen,
dass in der Stadt Wilhelmshaven bereits in angemessener Weise
mit dem Gedenken an die Opfer des Nazi-Unrechtsregimes umgegangen
wird.
As repeatedly documented the petitioner and father of
the child openly speaks out against the re-activation of the
body of thought of national socialism within the Federal Republic
of Germany inclusively the working methods of Nazi-jurists.
As repeatedly documented the petitioner and father of the
child openly speaks out against injustice systems and against
propaganda material which is destined by its content to continue
the intentions of former national socialist organisations.
As documented the petitioner and father of the child has been
confirmed and supported in his democratic, constitutional
and human rights orientation, in his socio-political approaches
and initiatives on 02.09.03 by the mayor of the city of Wilhelmshaven
Eberhard Menzel.
Thank you very much for your acceptance to support financially
the public relations work for a more humane society with the
example of exhibitions on German Judiciary Crimes against
Humanity at the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
Sofern das Amtsgericht um finanzielle Hilfe für tatsächliche
Ausstellungen nachsuchen würde, würde die Stadt
sich dem sicherlich nicht verschließen, soweit es ihre
finanzielle Lage zulässt.
Unfortunately, the respective official to the district
court of Wilhelmshaven have not been answered until today
so that for the time being a positive stance can not be reported
to you.
It may be put into question if this is based on seemingly
general and partially politically motivated slowness of judicial
processing or on a basic refusal and dislike of a certain
legal policy attitudes to face history and wrongdoing.
You can be assured, that regardless of the reasons for the
delay the work from this side will continue on the present
subject matter and problem with accompanying judicial and
political initiatives, so that there is some hope, to report
to you in a more or less near future about the reactions of
the competent and responsible jurists.
If there should be a positive reaction to the respective official
demands to the district court of Wilhelmshaven, you will be
immediately informed.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about
the entry of the present document is two weeks.
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Arenhoevel,
chairman of the German Association of judges,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the German Association of judges,
Hereby the official demand is entered at the German association
of judges for official stances on the practised and documented
leitkultur of German family judges and on the democracy-constitutionality
philosophy of the German association of judges in the German
judicial reality.
In fact, the present questions are of crucial importance within
the socio-political and legal policy context of German history,
resulting from the documentation of the history of the present
proceedings.
Within the socio-political and legal policy context of German
history, among others the following basic questions have to
be reflected and answered:
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary
able and interested to effect a "real independent, voluntary
self control and self monitoring"?
Is the credo of the Nazi-jurists' ideals of "Acquittal
for their own purposes" and "There is honour among
thieves" still valid during the century following the
Nazi-terror?
Is the systematic self-acquittal for own purposes with writing
in the style of Persilscheine still en vogue in Germany?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary
able and interested to guarantee that all humans independent
from sex, nationality and status are equal before the law?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary
able and interested to act against the economic dependence
and political dependence which the Association of German judges
has described within its press releases?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary
able and interested to prove that within the political judicial
reality of the so-called Federal Republic of Germany, Germany
has no longer a Fuehrer and Germany is no longer a Fuehrer
state?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary
able and interested to prove that the German judiciary will
not let itself get instrumentalised for the political persecution
of children rights and human rights activist?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary
able and interested to prove that the German authorities can
serve the humans and not that the Human Material has to serve
the German authorities?
Does the herein documented behaviour and proceedings of German
family judges correspond to the quality standard of German
judge's performance promoted by the Association of German
judges?
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about
the entry of the present document is two weeks.
Respectfully
Hochachtungsvoll
Michael Hickman
Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur
on the situation of
Human Rights in Germany
to the United Nations and
to the European Institutions
|