to the District Court of Wilhlemshaven
16.09.2003

 

Michael Hickman
XXX
XXX

Amtsgericht Wilhelmshaven
-Familiengericht-
Amtsgericht, Postfach 1154,
26388 Wilhelmshaven
04421 408 117

Beschwerdezyklen beim Justizministerium von Niedersachsen AKTENZEICHEN 4121 E -S4. 54/03 und AKTENZEICHEN 3700 E - 204.37/03
Dr. Busch, Frau Bakker, Herr Wessels, Frau Ballnus
Am Waterloo Platz 1
30169 Hannover
poststelle@mj.niedersachsen.de

Eberhard Menzel
Der Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Wilhelmshaven
Rathausplatz 1
26382 Wilhelmshaven

Niedersächsischer Landtag
Hinrich-Wilhelm-Kopf-Platz 1
30159 Hannover
Postfach 4407
30044 Hannover
vockert@vockert.de,
klaus.krumfuss@t-online.de,
info@frauke-heiligenstadt.de

The Hague Conference on Private International Law Mr. Hans van Loon, Secretary General
Prof. William Duncan
Deputy Secretary General
Permanent Bureau of
The Hague Conference
on Private International Law
Scheveningseweg 6
2517 KT Den-Haag
The Netherlands
Wd@hcch.nl
Hvl@hcch.nl
secretariat@hcch.net

Mr Sibusiso Bengu
The South African Ambassador to Germany
South African Embassy
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin
botschaft@suedafrika.org

The South African President
Mr. T.M. Mbeki
Office of the President
Private Bag X1000
Pretoria 0001
Südafrika
President@po.gov.za

Marita Sehn
Anke Schwarzbäck
Petition Committee at the German Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss des deutschen Bundestages
Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
Fax: 030 227 30015
marita.sehn@bundestag.de
klaus.hagemann@bundestag.de

Wolfgang Thierse
President of the German federal parliament
Präsident des Deutschen Bundestages
Personal Referent
Persönlicher Referent
Wolfram Kolodziej-Derfert
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
wolfgang.thierse@bundestag.de
praesident@bundestag.de

Deutscher Richterbund
Vorsitzender Wolfgang Arenhövel
Kronenstr. 73/74
10117 Berlin
Wolfgang.Arenhoevel@lg-os.niedersachsen.de
frank.sta.freiburg@t-online.de
jan.grotheer@fg.justiz.hamburg.de
elmar.herrler@olg-n.bayern.de
brigitte.kamphausen@lg-duisburg.nrw.de
BettinaLeetz@web.de
August-Wilhelm.Marahrens@lg-h.niedersachsen.de
dwtapper@rz-online.de
HanspeterT@t-online.de
info@drb.de

Institut für Menschenrechte
Institute for human rights, Berlin
info@institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de

Commission on Human Rights
Support Services Branch
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
1503@ohchr.org

Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg
Postfach 2451
26014 Oldenburg
Poststelle@olg-ol.niedersachsen.de

16 September 2003

The official application to institute criminal proceedings against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg on the grounds of kidnapping, child trafficking and the formation of a criminal association with the German Family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.

 

Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee at the German federal parliament,

With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition proceedings at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630 the herein documented events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the regional court of Wilhelmshaven are indicated as further proof for the establishing of an independent enquête committee on the judiciary crimes against humanity by the practice of German family law jurisdiction.
Why are there written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively invalid for a certain population group due to sex, status, and nationality out of political motivation?

 

The official application to institute criminal proceedings against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg on the grounds of kidnapping, child trafficking and the formation of a criminal association with the German Family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven

Copy to the file 16 F 229/03 UG
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
15. September 2003

Reasoning:


Correctly founded rejection of judges due to bias
Judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg was rejected according to § 42 of the civil process regulations (the right of rejection), due to the concern that he would be biased. The rejection based on the grounds of mistrust of the impartiality of judge Kuhlmann was justified based on the documented case of international child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access.
The application the higher regional court of Oldenburg according to §44 of the civil process regulations (application of rejection) was made in accordance with the regulations against judge Kuhlmann. The grounds for the rejection were correctly made credible.
Consult the petition "Legalisation of boycott of access in the wake of international child abduction by German authorities by Germany" from 10. August 2003 to the higher regional court of Oldenburg file number 14 UF 126/03 UG:

Rejection of judges of the higher regional court of Oldenburg due to bias
From the tool-set of manipulation filters applied by German authorities the higher regional court of Oldenburg with the judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert chooses as already documented for the manipulation of complaint proceedings the specific tool of confirming and covering the incorrect proceedings of the German family judge Staubwasser from the district court of Wilhelmshaven by copying and duplicating these incorrect proceedings.
The aim of these manipulation is to build up a wall of silence around the political motivation by pushing away the circulating responsibilities within the initial proceedings as well as within the resulting complaint proceedings so that the judiciary scandals are hidden and the incorrect proceedings are covered.
a) Decision of 15.08.2001 document number 16 F 605/00 UG by the German family judge Dr. Bessel of the District Court of Wilhelmshaven ordering contact between the children and father of the children.
b) boycott of the court ordered contact on the 21.08.03 with the help of third parties.
c) non-enforcement of the court order for access
d) undue delay of proceedings in child matters by the court over a period of more than one year
e) 03.09.02 The broadcasting of the ARTE TV documentary (Theme evening. War over children)
f) 04.09.02 FILE NUMBER 16 F 605/00 UG. Court hearing at the district court of Wilhelmshaven. After undue delay of one year at the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the German family judge Staubwasser sets a delay for his decision taking, which the German family judge Staubwasser deliberately exceeds.
g) Decision dated 04.10.02 FILE NUMBER 16 F 605/00 UG of the German family law judge Staubwasser, which is only published after official complaints against undue delay. Arbitrary denial of access on access, which has not taken place over the period of one year, whereas the court ordered access has not been enforced by the court.
The judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher regional court of Oldenburg engage in deliberate careless consultation of the file as documented in the decision of the higher regional court of Oldenburg on this part of the proceedings' history.
The judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher regional court of Oldenburg they are responsible by deliberately covering their German jurist colleague, i.e., the German family judge Staubwasser from the district court of Wilhelmshaven, for the practised and documented leitkultur at the district court of Wilhelmshaven within the German family law policy (see Section 5a, 5b1, 5b2, 5c).
Hereby the official legal demand is entered for rejection of the judges Bartels, Kuhlmann, Dr. Schubert from the higher regional court of Oldenburg due to bias.

Deliberate violation of the civil procedure regulations by judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
The higher regional court of Oldenburg has documented with the decision 01.09.03, postmark 04.09.03, file number 14 F 126/03 UG considerable irregularities in respect to the procedural requirements in the case at hand of international child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access.
The rejected judge, judge Kuhlmann has under breach of duty and violation of §44 civil procedural regulations deliberately ignored to answer the reasons for rejection. The applicant has deliberately not been informed by the higher regional court of Oldenburg about the statement of the rejected judge Kuhlmann which are mandatory duty.
Under the violation of § 48 civil procedural regulations judge Kuhlmann has deliberately not informed the higher regional court of Oldenburg, competent for the demand of rejection, that judge Kuhlmann informs about circumstances, compare the explanations under 1 a), which could justify a rejection or that due to other reason judge Kuhlmann should be excluded in accordance with legal guidelines.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that judge Kuhlmann is deliberately ignoring the application for rejection on the grounds of bias. In addition, judge Kuhlmann is simultaneously violating the civil procedural regulations in his decision whereas judge Kuhlmann himself quotes the civil procedural regulations.
Deliberate violations of the legal demand to refrain from the attempt to incite the petitioner to committing the criminal offence of trafficking of child and humans
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional court of Oldenburg have documented in the case concerned of international child abduction to Germany that, the applicant, the foreign left behind father, who has kidnapped no children, has not legalised child abduction, neither has he participated in child trafficking or has he legalised child trafficking.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg has correctly been informed about the legal demand to refrain from the attempt to incite the petitioner to committing the criminal offence of child trafficking.
Consult the petition "Legalisation of boycott of access in the wake of international child abduction by German authorities by Germany" from 10. August 2003 to the higher regional court of Oldenburg file number 14 UF 126/03 UG.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner of the child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt to incite the petitioner and father of the child to acts of criminal offences in trafficking of children and humans by intentionally generating turnover and profit of judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German authorities in child abduction, boycott of access and misuse of authority.
Nevertheless, the higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that, judge Kuhlmann, who is deliberately ignoring the rejection application due to bias, handed in correctly, simultaneously violates the civil procedural regulations, compare the explanation given under 1a) and 1b), and takes a decision in which judge Kuhlmann imposes costs on the applicant, the foreign left behind father, who does not kidnapped children, who does not legalise child abduction, who neither participates in child trafficking nor legalises child trafficking.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that judge Kuhlmann deliberately abuses FGG 13a, to discriminate against and to disadvantage the foreign left behind father, as FGG 13a only represent a "can " and not a "must" provision.
With the imposition of costs on the parent who has acted legally, who as documented does not resort to take the law into his own hands, does not kidnap children to gain advantage for himself and to influence decisions in custody cases, judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg intends purposefully to complicate the realisation of the rights of the bi-national children and their foreign left-behind parent.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that judge Kuhlmann is of the personal political view, that in cases of international child abduction to Germany, the foreign left behind victim parent and the foreign left behind environment must pay the court costs for the legal proceedings on access with the children brought to Germany. Even as documented in the present case where access ordered by the court in Germany is deliberately not enforced over a period of more than one year.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents in the case concerned, that the legal policy acting of judge Kuhlmann in the judicial reality has nothing whatsoever to do with the term " the wellbeing of the child," but that "the German wellbeing of the child" as within the practised family law policy by judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg represents only a ostensible reason presented and a placeholder for "economic" and "political" interests that are hostile to the wellbeing of the child.
The regional court of Oldenburg has documented in the case at hand, that judge Kuhlmann from the higher regional court of Oldenburg intends that family law proceedings and decisions for access which are deliberately not enforced, are to be financed by not only the foreign left-behind parent and environments but also by the German tax money.
As documented at the higher regional court of Oldenburg, judge Kuhlmann from the regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert engages in his political aim of self-acquittal in writing in the style of Persilscheine whereas there is a wide gap between the social reality and the constructed, theoretical judicial reality.
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional court of Oldenburg have documented in the case concerned of international child abduction to Germany that the applicant and foreign left behind father does not kidnap children, does legalise child abduction, and does neither legalise nor engage in child trafficking.
By means of legalising child abduction and the abuse and exploitation of children in child trafficking turnover and profit for the German judicial business shall be generated.
The official application is made to the director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Kahlen to institute criminal proceedings against judge Kuhlmann of higher regional court of Oldenburg
Hereby the legal demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and to Mr. Kahlen, director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, to correctly process complete criminal charges against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg. The usual judicial delay of two weeks is to be observed, in order to notify the applicant of receipt of the present document and of the allocated file number. Should this legal matter be forwarded by the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the appropriate copies of all documentation with entry and forwarding confirmation together with the present complete documentation and the respective exit stamp are to be correctly sent as well to the applicant for documenting the administrative act by the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare the explanations in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c), and in accordance with the official guidelines of the Federal justice ministry (file number R B 3 - to: 9311/22-2-23 335/2033 from 14. April 2003) as well as in accordance with the official guidelines of the justice ministry of Lower Saxony. (File number 4121 E -S4. 54/03 from 11.02.2003 and from 01. August 2003), criminal charges against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg are directly entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven as well as to the politically and morally responsible director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen on the grounds of kidnapping § 235 German criminal code and of child trafficking § 236 German criminal code. Thereby it has to be examined via the proper legal action, whether judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg is under circumstances deliberately engaging in committing the criminal offences mentioned earlier.
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare the explanations in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c) and in accordance with the official guidelines of the Federal justice ministry (file number R B 3 - to: 9311/22-2-23 335/2033 from 14. April 2003) as well as in accordance with the official guidelines of the justice ministry of Lower Saxony. (File number 4121 E -S4. 54/03 from 11.02.2003 and from 01. August 2003), criminal charges against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg are directly entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven as well as to the politically and morally responsible director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen on the grounds of formation of criminal conspiracy § 129 German criminal code. Thereby it has to be examined via the proper legal action, whether judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg is under the circumstances deliberately engaging in committing the criminal offences mentioned earlier. The criminal offence of criminal conspiracy with the German family judge Staubwasser from the district court of Wilhelmshaven is to be examined via the regular legal action separately in each and every single charge already entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven against the family judge Staubwasser. In accordance with the statements of the deputy director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Schroeder from 18.08.03 and from 27.08.03 FILE NUMBER 313E, the criminal charges listed in the following have already been forwarded from the district court of Wilhelmshaven to the competent office of the public prosecutor. by.
--- 5 pages documentation and presentation of evidence from the 30.07.03. criminal charges against employees of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code §267 falsification of documents, §269 falsification of proof relevant data, violation of procedural requirements and irregularities by violating the right to a fair trial.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 31.07.03. criminal charges against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code § 202 violation of postal secret, § 202a espionage of data, § 267 falsification of documents, § 269 falsification of proof relevant data, § 274 burking of documents. Indicating a document in the decision as so-called proof material without providing the source and origin as well as deliberate refusal of verification of the document's by the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven against official legal demands
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 01.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code. § 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 misuse of authority, deliberate deception of participants in the proceedings by deliberately re-naming participants of proceedings participating in the court hearing from 21.05.2003 for advantaging
participants of proceedings by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
--- 6 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 03.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family court judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 153 false declaration under oath, § 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 misuse of authority, § 269 falsification of proof relevant data, § 274 burking of documents, § 348 false documented statements in office. Deliberate false declarations on the documentation of the petitioner, the status of the file in the legal case and deliberate burking of documents by violating the right to fair trial by rejecting of offered evidence given by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 04.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 235 child abduction, § 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 Misuse of authority, § StGB 269 falsifying of proof relevant data. Deliberate false declarations on the documented proceedings of the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the social reality as well as in judicially constructed reality by the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court of in the presented case of international child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access since 1995.
--- 9 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 05.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven. German criminal code: § 239a Erpresserischer Menschenraub, § 240 Coercion, § 241 threatening, § 241a political persecution, § 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 misuse of authority. Deliberate coercion of the petitioner and father of the child under violation of freedom of speech with the intention of the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, to blackmail, threat and intimidate with the threat and coercion to prevent the access to the children, if the petitioner and father of the child is complaining in public and in the media about the incorrect proceedings of German judicial and social authorities of Wilhelmshaven in family law proceedings on international child abduction to Germany, whereas the German family judge Staubwasser is engaging in the political persecution of children rights and human rights activists.
--- 9 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 06.08.03. Criminal charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate slandering, § 187 slandering. Deliberate insult, defamation and discrediting of the petitioner and father of the child and deliberate biased proceedings by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven as intentional distraction from the incorrect proceedings of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 07.08.03. Criminal charges against the family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate slandering, § 187 slandering, § 189 deliberate insult of the memorial of deceased. deliberate insult of the memorial of deceased, here the foreign left behind grandfather of the children brought to Germany in family law proceedings by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the present case of international child abduction and the resulting boycott of access
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 07.08.03. Criminal charges against the family court judge Staubwasser of the district court in Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate slandering, § 187 slandering, $ 189. Deliberate slandering, defamation and discrediting of the binational children participating in the proceedings in the present case of international child abduction and the resulting boycott of access by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
--- 20 pages documentation and presentation of evidence from 08.08.03. Criminal charges against the family court judge Staubwasser of the district court in Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 83 preparation of high treason, § 86 distribution of propaganda material of organisations violating the German constitution, § 132 pretending office titles, § 211 preparation and attempt of judiciary murder, § 234 Trafficking of humans, § 235 child abduction, § 239 preparation and attempt of deprivation of freedom, § 241a political persecution. Preparation of high treason and as well as distribution of propaganda material of organisations violating the German constitution for protection and propaganda reasons of German crimes against humanity, while with the pretension of office titles preparation and attempt of deprivation of freedom and judiciary murder is effected in order to promote the political persecution of children rights and human rights activists while the illegal legalisation of trafficking of humans and child abduction is used for the coercion and blackmailing of the petitioner and father of the child in the present case of international child abduction and the resulting boycott of access.
Therefore it has to be examined via the proper legal channels judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg together with the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven have engaged in the formation of a criminal conspiracy, whereas the pursuit of which appears after considering all circumstances as unacceptable as it is against the basic values of a state order that respects human dignity. In addition, it has to be clarified who plays a leading role and who works in the background of the criminal conspiracy for the legalisation of international child abduction and boycott of access in respect to abuse and exploitation of children within the child trafficking of the German judicial business.

Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of applying the working methods of the Nazi-jurists within the present legal matter
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt of applying the working methods with the principles "There is honour among thieves" and "Acquittal for their own purposes" of the Nazi-jurists within the present legal matter.
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the systematic self-acquittal for own purposes with writing in the style of Persilscheine.

Legal demand for expeditious proceedings
Especially, as the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder had expeditious proceedings even against the free press in the legal matter "coloured hair" before the culminating point of the election campaign 2002 whereas proceedings on child abduction, boycott of access, violation of custody, misuse of authority, and German crimes against Humanity are deliberately delayed and are deliberately not correctly processed.
It is supposed that the German "independent, non-political and non-corrupt" judiciary as represented here by the district court of Wilhelmshaven has a clear understanding of the value of legal goods "coloured hairs vs. Children and Humans."

Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner of the child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt to incite the petitioner and father of the child to acts of criminal offences in trafficking of children and humans by intentionally generating turnover and profit of judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German authorities in child abduction, boycott of access and misuse of authority.

Legal delay
The district court of Wilhelmshaven has the usual legal delay of two weeks to inform the petitioner about the entry of the present document and the file number of the present legal matter.

 

 

Dear Mr. Kahlen, director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
Dear Mr. Schroeder, deputy director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,

As the moral and political directors of the district court of Wilhelmshaven you are certainly interested in a praiseworthy manner to proof that you personally have broken with the fatal continuity of the working methods of the Nazi-Jurists in the judicial reality of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The self-acquittal of the Judiciary is an incident with many participants, which links the history of the federal republic to the history of the Third Reich.
The Post of Gdansk
History of a German Judicial Murder
It is documented that the main denazification committee of the district of Oldenburg promoted among others on 22.2.1949 the career of the Nazi-Jurist Dr. Bode within the Federal Republic of Germany, who had taken part in the judicial murder of Gdansk.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your action pattern of responsible German jurists has to be definitely supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven, to open a memorial at the entrance to the district court of Wilhelmshaven that names the Nazi-Jurists who were active in Hitler's regime who later made careers in the Federal Republic of Germany, in particular in the region of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg
Your personal stance of moral courage is welcomed to distance yourself in public from, what has been documented by world history on the German terror judiciary. Certainly, you are aware in your daily business how easily the German judiciary is to be abused as an instrument of terror with manipulation of files and proceedings to match politically predetermined court decisions. Your sincere approach as German jurists to learn your lessons from that for your legal policy interpretations and your legal policy practising within the German Federal Republic of Germany is definitely welcomed.
It is to be assumed, that you personally as decent, respectable Germans, additionally as German jurists in political offices, will have no problems at all with facing and coming to terms with the past of the German judicial history and that you correctly and with good will, transparency and honest enlightenment and clarification of facts stand up as a trend-setting good example for humanity, human rights and democracy within the judicial reality of the German Federal Republic of Germany.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your action pattern of responsible German jurists has to be definitely supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven to order the following touring exhibitions for the delay at least of one month to the district court of Wilhelmshaven by exhibition exchange every six months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in the name of the German people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War mööt wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia in the state hospital and nursing home/mental institution Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven (1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners under National Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the City of Oldenburg during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the region of Oldenburg
Hereby the official demand is entered at the district court of Wilhelmshaven, to open a memorial that names the German Jurists in the region of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg who have stood up against Adolf Hitler in front of the memorial at the entrance to the district court of Wilhelmshaven that names the Nazi-Jurists who were active in Hitler's regime who later made careers in the Federal Republic of Germany, in particular in the region of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg.
Your personal stance of moral courage is welcomed to distance yourself in public from, what has been documented by world history on the German terror judiciary. Certainly, you are aware in your daily business how easily the German judiciary is to be abused as an instrument of terror with manipulation of files and proceedings to match politically predetermined court decisions. Your sincere approach as German jurists to learn your lessons from that for your legal policy interpretations and your legal policy practising within the German Federal Republic of Germany is definitely welcomed.
The praiseworthy approach not only to name German jurists without backbone but also to name the jurists of Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg, who demonstrated moral courage as German jurists, and who would rather be sent to concentration camps than to be subjected to the political instrumentalisation of the German judiciary, is welcomed.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of the present document is two weeks.

 

The official complaint to the supervision authority judge Kuhlmann of the regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert for the violation of the right to a fair trial and the right to be heard to the justice ministry of Lower Saxony

Dear Mr. Kramer, president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the higher regional court of Oldenburg,


As the moral and political president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg you are certainly interested in a praiseworthy manner to proof that you personally have broken with the fatal continuity of the working methods of the Nazi-Jurists in the judicial reality of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The self-acquittal of the Judiciary is an incident with many participants, which links the history of the federal republic to the history of the Third Reich.
The Post of Gdansk
History of a German Judicial Murder
It is documented that the main denazification committee of the district of Oldenburg promoted among others on 22.2.1949 the career of the Nazi-Jurist Dr. Bode within the Federal Republic of Germany, who had taken part in the judicial murder of Gdansk.
Your sincere and honourable legal policy mentality and your action pattern of responsible German jurists has to be definitely supported.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the higher regional court of Oldenburg an the morally and politically responsible president Kramer, to work on special exhibition about character pattern, misuse of authority, and abuse of power by German judges in the Hitler-Regime, which can serve as a touring exhibition as a presentation to the public at the higher regional court of Oldenburg as well as at other German courts.
The official inauguration should take place in the foyer of the higher regional court of Oldenburg, whereas the general overview and the basic thoughts of the touring exhibition should be available as a permanent exhibition in the foyer of the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
The suggestions for the base thoughts are : independence and moral courage of German judges as well as the acting of German judges under the tension on the one hand of state ideologies, political influence and on the other hand of humans humanity and human rights departing from the case Ewald Schlitt (see section explanations in 4c1) in this respect), Hitler's political instrumentalisation of the German judiciary as well as resistance respectively non-resistance of German jurists against Hitler and against political instrumentalisation of the German judiciary.

Dear Mrs. Silke Osterthun from the higher regional court of Oldenburg,
thank you very much for your correct email-confirmation for the entry of the complaints to the supervision authority against judge Bartels and judge Schubert from the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
Dienstaufsichtbeschwerden vom 04.09.2003 und 07.09.2003:
Sehr geehrter Herr Hickmann,
hiermit bestätige ich den Eingang Ihrer Dienstaufsichtbeschwerde
gegen Richter Bartels vom 04.09.2003 und den Eingang Ihrer Dienstaufsichtbeschwerde gegen Richter Schubert vom
07.09.2003.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Im Auftrag
Dr. Oehlers
With reference to the present explained reasoning, compare the explanations in this respect section 1a), 1b), 1c), the complaint to the supervision authority with disciplinary measures and dismissal from office is entered against the judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg at the higher regional court of Oldenburg on grounds of violations of the right of fair trial and the right to be heard.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of the present document is two weeks.

 

Dear Dr. Busch, Mrs. Bakker, Mr. Wessels, Mrs. Ballnus,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony,

In the German history of international child abduction the proceedings of judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony already have a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice and due to certain traditional family law practice. The proceedings of authorities of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President Bill Clinton.
With reference to the complaint cycle document number 4121 E -S4. 54/03 and document number 3700 E - 204.37/03, official demand is made to the justice Ministry of Lower Saxony in respect of the official stance of the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony as to the amount of voluntary reparations payments that the Justice Ministry of lower Saxony is prepared to recommend to the Land of Lower Saxony to pay to the UN-Children's Rights Commission, to UNICEF, to the Commissioner for Human Rights at the European Parliament, project for the Protection of Human Rights, as well as national and international NGO's active in the field of missing, exploited, abused and abducted children, due to the incorrect, behaviour and procedures of judges of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction and boycott of access.
Hereby the official complaint against judge Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg with disciplinary measures and dismissal from office is entered at the justice ministry of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to assist and support correctly and effectively the district court of Wilhelmshaven in ordering the following touring exhibitions for the delay at least of one month to the district court of Wilhelmshaven and to the higher regional court of Wilhelmshaven by exhibition exchange six months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in the name of the German people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War mööt wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia in the state hospital and nursing home/mental institution Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven (1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners under National Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the City of Oldenburg during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the region of Oldenburg
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of the present document is two weeks.

 

Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,

In the German history of international child abduction the proceedings of judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony have already a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice and due to certain traditional family law practices. The proceedings of authorities of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President Bill Clinton.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to include a paragraph against child abduction and boycott of access in the Constitution of the Land of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to establish an independent enquête committee of the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony on Judiciary Crimes against Humanity by the practice of German family jurisdiction effected by judicial and social authorities of the Land of Lower Saxony.
The case of Ewald Schlitt and the "disenfranchised judges" (Consult the annex Pages 111-114; The Lexicon of Judicial Errors) portrays two fundamental aspects of the Nazi judiciary, that are once again to be found today in the realm of family law jurisprudence on the functional level of the procedural techniques and of the judicial-political behaviour pattern as documented in the current case of international child abduction at the district court of Wilhelmshaven, at the regional court of Oldenburg and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
--- the totally exaggerated judgements, that are deliberately violating the interstate legal regulations and guidelines
--- the political instrumentalisation of the judiciary, as a result of deliberate Non-resistance by German jurists as functionaries of the state in definite contrast to being functionaries of the citizens
a) In the case Ewald Schlitt (1942) the regional court of Oldenburg arrives at a decision that deliberately exceeds the legal requirements.
Hitler and Goebbels are using this legal case for their own political objectives and arrange via the secretary of state Freisler a deliberate manipulation of file and proceedings, to achieve the politically prior determined death sentence.
The competent responsible regional court of Oldenburg offers no resistance against the manipulation of the court proceedings ordered by Hitler.
Hitler now has his precedent to carry out what he has long planned for. At the session of the Reichstag (parliament) of the 26 April 1942 showered with applause he shouted out:
>> I expect, the German judiciary to understand, that the nation is not there for the sake of the judiciary, but that the judiciary is there for their sake of the nation <<
>> From now on I will intervene in these cases and judges who apparently do not recognise the command will be relieved of their office! <<
Following this speech, the Reichstag arrived at a corresponding decision. For the first time in the history of the civilised world judges were expendable without legal recourse.
(Consult the annex page 113-114; ; The Lexicon of Judicial errors)
The competent and responsible regional court of Oldenburg keeps silent.
The competent and responsible regional court of Oldenburg thereby tolerates the direct political intervention in the so called " independent " German judiciary.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional court of Oldenburg, the higher regional court of Oldenburg have deliberately not name the judges, directors and presidents, who have stood up against Adolf Hitler.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional court of Oldenburg, the higher regional court of Oldenburg have deliberately not name the judges, directors and the presidents, who demonstrated moral courage as German jurists could, and who would rather be sent to concentration camps than to be subjected to the political instrumentalisation of the German judiciary.
b) On the functional level of the procedural techniques and of the judicial-political behaviour pattern as documented in the current case of international child abduction at the district court of Wilhelmshaven, at the regional court of Oldenburg (responsible for complaints to the supervision authorities against judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven) and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg (responsible for complaints and appeal against the district court of Wilhelmshaven) the following aspects are documented.
--- the totally exaggerated judgements, that are deliberately violating the interstate legal regulations and guidelines
--- the political instrumentalisation of the judiciary, as a result of deliberate Non-resistance by German jurists as functionaries of the state in definite contrast to being functionaries of the citizens
The district court of Wilhelmshaven and the higher regional court of Oldenburg do not document openly and with transparency, if possibly and under circumstances there exists a kind of collision of interests between on the one hand, the official independence of judges and on the other hand, the objective fact that the legal representation Dr. Uwe Biester with the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester occupies a political/judicial position at the ministry of justice with the government of Lower Saxony and has thereby at the judiciary evaluation office (Justizprüfungsamt) influence on judicial careers in Lower Saxony.
Until today it has not been correctly clarified in how far the socio-political status of the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester can under circumstances have an influence on proceedings at German judicial authorities like at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg in which the legal representation Dr. Uwe Biester participates.
The objective fact is that within the present proceedings at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court of Oldenburg on international child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access, in which the legal representation of Dr. Uwe Biester is involved, irregularities in procedural requirements occur as repeatedly documented. Like the undue delay of proceedings and the non-enforcement of court ordered access with the children abducted to Germany.
In addition to a political/judicial position at the with the government of Lower Saxony on the regional level, the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester also occupies at the city council of Wilhelmshaven on the local level.
Until today it has not been correctly clarified in how far the socio-political status of the advocate and member of the city council Dr. Uwe Biester can under circumstances have an influence on proceedings at German social and administrative authorities like at the Children Welfare Office of Wilhelmshaven and at the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven, which are involved in family law proceedings at the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
The objective fact is that within the present proceedings at the district court of Wilhelmshaven on international child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access, in which the Children Welfare Office of Wilhelmshaven and the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven are involved, irregularities in procedural requirements occur as repeatedly documented. Like the attempt to deport the foreign left-behind parent from Germany before the decision of the district court of Wilhelmshaven on the arbitrary denial of access is published on access which never has taken place before because the court ordered access with the children abducted to Germany has deliberately not been enforced over the preceding deliberate undue delay of proceedings for the period of one year.
To date the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the regional court of Oldenburg, the higher regional court of Oldenburg document silence on the situation just described.
The competent and responsible courts of Wilhelmshaven and of Oldenburg document in the complaints to the supervision authority and in the complaint proceedings against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court in Wilhelmshaven, that the regional court of Oldenburg and the higher regional court of Oldenburg do not stand up against the legal representation Dr. Uwe Biester and thereby tolerate and support the political infringement on the so called "independent" German judiciary.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to dismiss the advocate Dr. Uwe Biester immediately from his political offices at the government of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to officially recommend to the competent bar association to revoke the admittance to the bar of the attorney Dr. Uwe Biester.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to assist and support correctly and effectively the district court of Wilhelmshaven in ordering the following touring exhibitions for the delay at least of one month to the district court of Wilhelmshaven by exhibition exchange every six months :
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in the name of the German people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War mööt wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia in the state hospital and nursing home/mental institution Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven (1939 - 1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners under National Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the City of Oldenburg during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the region of Oldenburg
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to pay reparations to the federal organisation of the victims of euthanasia in accordance with the federal law on reparations on the victims of national socialist persecution (BEG) and to offer research budgets with the amount of 250 000 EURO.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to establish an independent enquête committee of the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony on the incidents of pseudo-patients and psychiatry victims in the
nursing home/mental institution Wehnen.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to immediately close mental institution Wehnen.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony to include a paragraph against child abduction and boycott of access in the Constitution of the Land of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official demand is entered to publish the present petitions and the respective conclusive recommendations in a publication of the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony as well as on the activities of the petition committee at the Parliament of the Land of Lower Saxony.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of the present document is two weeks.

 

Dear Mr. Eberhard Menzel, mayor of Wilhelmshaven,

thank you very much for your letter from 02.09.2003 in which you speak out against the Nazi injustice system.
Zu diesen Anträgen möchte ich Ihnen mitteilen, dass in der Stadt Wilhelmshaven bereits in angemessener Weise mit dem Gedenken an die Opfer des Nazi-Unrechtsregimes umgegangen wird.
As repeatedly documented the petitioner and father of the child openly speaks out against the re-activation of the body of thought of national socialism within the Federal Republic of Germany inclusively the working methods of Nazi-jurists.
As repeatedly documented the petitioner and father of the child openly speaks out against injustice systems and against propaganda material which is destined by its content to continue the intentions of former national socialist organisations.
As documented the petitioner and father of the child has been confirmed and supported in his democratic, constitutional and human rights orientation, in his socio-political approaches and initiatives on 02.09.03 by the mayor of the city of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel.
Thank you very much for your acceptance to support financially the public relations work for a more humane society with the example of exhibitions on German Judiciary Crimes against Humanity at the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
Sofern das Amtsgericht um finanzielle Hilfe für tatsächliche Ausstellungen nachsuchen würde, würde die Stadt sich dem sicherlich nicht verschließen, soweit es ihre finanzielle Lage zulässt.
Unfortunately, the respective official to the district court of Wilhelmshaven have not been answered until today so that for the time being a positive stance can not be reported to you.
It may be put into question if this is based on seemingly general and partially politically motivated slowness of judicial processing or on a basic refusal and dislike of a certain legal policy attitudes to face history and wrongdoing.
You can be assured, that regardless of the reasons for the delay the work from this side will continue on the present subject matter and problem with accompanying judicial and political initiatives, so that there is some hope, to report to you in a more or less near future about the reactions of the competent and responsible jurists.
If there should be a positive reaction to the respective official demands to the district court of Wilhelmshaven, you will be immediately informed.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of the present document is two weeks.

 

Dear Mr. Wolfgang Arenhoevel,
chairman of the German Association of judges,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the German Association of judges,

Hereby the official demand is entered at the German association of judges for official stances on the practised and documented leitkultur of German family judges and on the democracy-constitutionality philosophy of the German association of judges in the German judicial reality.
In fact, the present questions are of crucial importance within the socio-political and legal policy context of German history, resulting from the documentation of the history of the present proceedings.
Within the socio-political and legal policy context of German history, among others the following basic questions have to be reflected and answered:
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to effect a "real independent, voluntary self control and self monitoring"?
Is the credo of the Nazi-jurists' ideals of "Acquittal for their own purposes" and "There is honour among thieves" still valid during the century following the Nazi-terror?
Is the systematic self-acquittal for own purposes with writing in the style of Persilscheine still en vogue in Germany?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to guarantee that all humans independent from sex, nationality and status are equal before the law?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to act against the economic dependence and political dependence which the Association of German judges has described within its press releases?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to prove that within the political judicial reality of the so-called Federal Republic of Germany, Germany has no longer a Fuehrer and Germany is no longer a Fuehrer state?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to prove that the German judiciary will not let itself get instrumentalised for the political persecution of children rights and human rights activist?
Is the so-called "independent" German judiciary able and interested to prove that the German authorities can serve the humans and not that the Human Material has to serve the German authorities?
Does the herein documented behaviour and proceedings of German family judges correspond to the quality standard of German judge's performance promoted by the Association of German judges?
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least about the entry of the present document is two weeks.


Respectfully
Hochachtungsvoll

Michael Hickman


Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur
on the situation of
Human Rights in Germany
to the United Nations and
to the European Institutions