Michael Hickman
Wilhelmshaven
Beschwerdezyklen beim Justizministerium von Niedersachsen
AKTENZEICHEN 4121 E -S4. 54/03 und AKTENZEICHEN 3700 E - 204.37/03
Dr. Busch, Frau Bakker, Herr Wessels, Frau Ballnus
Am Waterloo Platz 1
30169 Hannover
poststelle@mj.niedersachsen.de
Niedersächsischer Landtag
Petition 05816/11/14
Petition 00447/08/15
Hinrich-Wilhelm-Kopf-Platz 1
30159 Hannover
Postfach 4407
30044 Hannover
vockert@vockert.de,
klaus.krumfuss@t-online.de,
info@frauke-heiligenstadt.de
Frau Kuck, Frau Busch
Fax 0511 3030 2806
The Hague Conference on Private International Law Mr. Hans van Loon, Secretary
General
Prof. William Duncan
Deputy Secretary General
Permanent Bureau of
The Hague Conference
on Private International Law
Scheveningseweg 6
2517 KT Den-Haag
The Netherlands
Wd@hcch.nl
Hvl@hcch.nl
secretariat@hcch.net
Mr Sibusiso Bengu
The South African Ambassador to Germany
South African Embassy
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin
botschaft@suedafrika.org
The South African President
Mr. T.M. Mbeki
Office of the President
Private Bag X1000
Pretoria 0001
Südafrika
President@po.gov.za
|
Marita Sehn
Anke Schwarzbäck
Petition Committee at the German Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss des deutschen Bundestages
Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
Fax: 030 227 30015
marita.sehn@bundestag.de
klaus.hagemann@bundestag.de
Wolfgang Thierse
President of the German federal parliament
Präsident des Deutschen Bundestages
Personal Referent
Persönlicher Referent
Wolfram Kolodziej-Derfert
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
wolfgang.thierse@bundestag.de
praesident@bundestag.de
Deutscher Richterbund
Vorsitzender Wolfgang Arenhövel
Kronenstr. 73/74
10117 Berlin
Wolfgang.Arenhoevel@lg-os.niedersachsen.de
frank.sta.freiburg@t-online.de
jan.grotheer@fg.justiz.hamburg.de
elmar.herrler@olg-n.bayern.de
brigitte.kamphausen@lg-duisburg.nrw.de
BettinaLeetz@web.de
August-Wilhelm.Marahrens@lg-h.niedersachsen.de
dwtapper@rz-online.de
HanspeterT@t-online.de
info@drb.de
Institut für Menschenrechte
Institute for human rights, Berlin
info@institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de
Commission on Human Rights
Support Services Branch
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
1503@ohchr.org
Amtsgericht Wilhelmshaven
-Familiengericht-
Kopien an16 F 229/03 UG, 16 F 357/03 SO
Postfach 1154,
26388 Wilhelmshaven
04421 408 117
|
20 September 2003
The official request to be informed of the status of
current proceedings and to make a statement on the constitutional conform,
constitutional unconform working methods in legal proceedings at the office
of the public prosecutor in Oldenburg
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German
parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee at the German
federal parliament,
With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition proceedings
at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630 the herein documented
events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the regional court of
Wilhelmshaven are indicated as further proof for the establishing of an independent
enquête committee on the judiciary crimes against humanity by the practice
of German family law jurisdiction.
Why are there written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively invalid
for a certain population group due to sex, status, and nationality out of
political motivation?
Dear prosecutor of Oldenburg,
The official application is hereby made to the public prosecutor of Oldenburg
to make a statement as to whether the signal has been received by the office
of the public prosecutor of Oldenburg regarding the criminal prosecution of
those involved in child abduction.
Prosecutor Jonna Ziemer from the prosecutor of Itzehoe officially states
that the criminal prosecution of international child abduction should have
a signal effect.
Yesterday at midday the second chamber of the regional court of Itzehoe sentenced
a grandmother to a three years sentence behind bars having her taken into
custody directly in the court room. Istavan S. was also sentenced to jail,
he got two years – as with his wife for child abduction.
05.09.2003, Hamburger Abendblatt
http://www.abendblatt.de/daten/2003/09/05/204329.html
Hereby the official request is entered at the office of the public prosecutor
of Oldenburg to make a statement as to the current standing of the proceedings
against child abduction being investigated by the office of the public prosecutor
in Oldenburg.
Hereby the official request is entered at the office of the public prosecutor
of Oldenburg to make a statement, whether the office of the public prosecutor
is experiencing political difficulties, in processing charges against child
abduction in accordance with the constitution, in regards to nationality,
status, and gender.
Prosecutor Helmut Windweh from the prosecutor of Magdeburg, Halberstadt,
officially states: "The good thing with the constitutional state is that independent
of the reputation of the person every one can brought before the court."
It is to be clarified in accordance with the regulations, whether the office
of the public prosecutor of Oldenburg represents the view that German citizenship
automatically legalises international child abduction to Germany.
The official stances by the prosecutor of Oldenburg are needed for pending
and future political initiatives on the regional level the federal level as
well as on the international level.
The usual judicial delay of two weeks is to be observed,
in order to notify the applicant of receipt of the present document and of
the allocated file number within the present legal matter.
The responsible chief public prosecutor of the office of the public prosecutor
of Oldenburg is legally liable for the correct processing of the applications
made.
Dear Dr. Busch, Mrs. Bakker, Mr. Wessels, Mrs. Ballnus,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony,
In the German history of international child abduction the proceedings of
judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony already have
a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice
and due to certain traditional family law practice. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
In accordance with the statements of the Association of German judges the
prosecutors have to obey the political views and aims of the respective German
government (see the respective press releases of the Association of German
judges since 1998).
Officially child abduction is a criminal offence which is required to be
prosecuted according to the German civil code.
In regard to international child abduction the official request for information
is made to the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony, if in the realm of the judicial
reality the Federal Republic of Germany by means of judicial-political officials,
that means, public prosecutors, implement a version of "Racial law" and if
in cases of binational children the cultural/racial variant “ to the protection
of German blood” is practised.
Additionally it is requested of the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony to name
according to the regulations, the politically responsible persons who have
given the instructions to the political officials as documented at the office
of the public prosecutor of Oldenburg not to criminally prosecute in cases
of child abduction in breach of the law according and contrary to the constitution
out of political motives such as nationality, status and gender
The questions put forward are founded according to documented differing actions
of the by the office of the public prosecutor in case of international child
abductions, where the motivation to criminal prosecute or not are dependant
on biological/racist and cultural/racist criteria
Whereas as is documented grandparents who are not of German blood are jailed
on the grounds of assistance in child abduction from Germany, the office
of the public prosecutor, refuses to prosecute and delays criminal proceedings
in the case of international child abduction to Germany where the grandparents
who are of German blood are involved.
The office of the public prosecutor of Oldenburg made known the manipulation
of several criminal charges laid by the foreign left behind parent in the
case of child abduction, the boycott of access and alienation. Public prosecutor
Mrs. Groskopff combined several separate criminal charges together under
one file number, wants to await the outcome of the family court hearing at
the district court of Wilhelmshaven, at the same time informs that she at
the time sees no concrete points to suggest criminal actions have been committed
by the persons concerned.
The office of the public prosecutor of Oldenburg documents by these actions
contradictory behaviour, criminal charges initiated by the abducting and
alienating environment against the left behind foreign parent during running
family court proceedings at the district court of Wilhelmshaven are duly
processed by the office of the public prosecutor of Oldenburg. The office
off the public prosecutor of Oldenburg documents that criminal proceedings
to are processed or are purposely not processed to influence family law proceedings
concerning child abduction and boycott of access at the district court of
Wilhelmshaven.
The office of the public prosecutor of Oldenburg documents that due to the
political motivation of cultural racism and gender discrimination criminal
charges laid against the left behind foreign parent are processed, whereas
the public prosecutor of Oldenburg simultaneously purposefully refuses to
or delays proceedings against the German abducting, access boycotting mother,
and the German abducting and alienating environment
Hereby the official complaint is entered to institute
an official enquiry against the head of the office of the public prosecutor
of Oldenburg for the promotion of working procedures which do not conform
to the constitution.
Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
In the German history of international child abduction the proceedings of
judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony have already
a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice
and due to certain traditional family law practices. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to include a paragraph against child abduction and boycott of
access in the Constitution of the Land of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to establish an independent enquête committee of the Parliament
of the Land of Lower Saxony on Judiciary Crimes against Humanity by the practice
of German family jurisdiction effected by judicial and social authorities
of the Land of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official petition is entered at the Parliament of the Land of
Lower Saxony to verify the refusal to proceed and the undue delay of proceedings
under misuse of authority and obstruction of justice in office of prosecutors
of Lower Saxony such as the prosecutor of Oldenburg in cases of child abduction.
To date the office of the public prosecutor of Oldenburg has documented for
example the following incorrect working methods:
The deliberate refusal to answer and to carry out the prosecution of the
criminal charges of the 12 May 2003 recorded in the documentation "Political
persecution of
Children and Human Rights Activists by German authorities" Die office of
the public prosecutor of Oldenburg therefore acts deliberately against the
guidelines set out by the Justice Ministry in the letter from Mrs. Bakker
of the 26 May 2003 file number 4121 E -S4. 54/03. The office of the
public prosecutor has therefore deliberately violated the provisions of the
German criminal code § 158 due to political motives.
Under FILE NUMBER 3 AR 19815/01 at the prosecutor of Aurich and FILE NUMBER
185 Js 46899/01 the criminal charge due to assistance in child abduction
against the deputy director Viering of the Children's Welfare Office (Jugendamt)
of Wilhelmshaven from 10 September 2001 is registered at the prosecutor of
Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, whereas the proceedings are deliberately delayed
until today.
Under FILE NUMBER 15 Gs 282/03 from 22 April 2003, the director of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven informs about confirmation of receipt for criminal
charges against Klaus Juerjens, director of the Children's Welfare Office
(Jugendamt) Wilhelmshaven, and the forwarding to the prosecutor of Oldenburg.
Under FILE NUMBER 15 Gs 282/03 from 22 April 2003, the director of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven informs about the confirmation of receipt for criminal
charges against German family judge Faße from the district court of
Wilhelmshaven according to the German criminal code § 235 child abduction
and the forwarding to the prosecutor of Oldenburg.
On the 28.10.2002 criminal charges are laid against the children’s mother
for child abduction in accordance with article. 1 Nr. 1, Article 2 Nr. 1
and 2, as well as Article 4 Nr 1. of §235 of the German civil code.
In letters of the19.11.2002, 09.01.2003 and 17.01.2003, file numbers 1 AR
814/02, 1 AR 34/03 and 1 AR 34/2003 the office of the Federal Attorney General
at the Federal Court in Karlsruhe documents that it has forwarded the documents
concerning criminal investigation to the office of the public prosecutor
at the regional court of Oldenburg.
In accordance with the statements of the deputy director of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Schroeder from 18.08.03 and from 27.08.03 FILE
NUMBER 313E, the following listed criminal charges have already been forwarded
from the district court of Wilhelmshaven to the office of the public prosecutor
of Oldenburg.
--- 5 pages documentation and presentation of evidence from the 30.07.03.
criminal charges against employees of the district court of Wilhelmshaven:
German criminal code §267 falsification of documents, §269 falsification
of proof relevant data, violation of procedural requirements and irregularities
by violating the right to a fair trial.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 31.07.03. criminal
charges against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code § 202 violation of postal secret,
§ 202a espionage of data, § 267 falsification of documents, §
269 falsification of proof relevant data, § 274 burking of documents.
Indicating a document in the decision as so-called proof material without
providing the source and origin as well as deliberate refusal of verification
of the document's by the German family judge Staubwasser of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven against official legal demands
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 01.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code. § 263 deception in legal proceedings,
§ 339 misuse of authority, deliberate deception of participants in the
proceedings by deliberately re-naming participants of proceedings participating
in the court hearing from 21.05.2003 for advantaging
participants of proceedings by the German family law judge Staubwasser of
the district court of Wilhelmshaven
--- 6 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 03.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family court judge Staubwasser of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 153 false declaration
under oath, § 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 misuse
of authority, § 269 falsification of proof relevant data, § 274
burking of documents, § 348 false documented statements in office. Deliberate
false declarations on the documentation of the petitioner, the status of
the file in the legal case and deliberate burking of documents by violating
the right to fair trial by rejecting of offered evidence given by the German
family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 04.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 235 child abduction, §
263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 Misuse of authority, §
StGB 269 falsifying of proof relevant data. Deliberate false declarations
on the documented proceedings of the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the
social reality as well as in judicially constructed reality by the German
family judge Staubwasser of the district court of in the presented case of
international child abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access
since 1995.
--- 9 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 05.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven. German criminal code: § 239a Erpresserischer
Menschenraub, $ 240 Coercion, § 241 threatening, § 241a political
persecution, § 263 deception in legal proceedings, § 339 misuse
of authority. Deliberate coercion of the petitioner and father of the child
under violation of freedom of speech with the intention of the German family
judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, to blackmail, threat
and intimidate with the threat and coercion to prevent the access to the
children, if the petitioner and father of the child is complaining in public
and in the media about the incorrect proceedings of German judicial and social
authorities of Wilhelmshaven in family law proceedings on international child
abduction to Germany, whereas the German family judge Staubwasser is engaging
in the political persecution of children rights and human rights activists.
--- 9 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 06.08.03. Criminal
charges against the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate
slandering, § 187 slandering. Deliberate insult, defamation and discrediting
of the petitioner and father of the child and deliberate biased proceedings
by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
as intentional distraction from the incorrect proceedings of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven.
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 07.08.03. Criminal
charges against the family law judge Staubwasser of the district court of
Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate
slandering, § 187 slandering, § 189 deliberate insult of the memorial
of deceased. deliberate insult of the memorial of deceased, here the foreign
left behind grandfather of the children brought to Germany in family law
proceedings by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven in the present case of international child abduction and
the resulting boycott of access
--- 8 pages documentation and presentation of evidence of the 07.08.03. Criminal
charges against the family court judge Staubwasser of the district court
in Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 185 insult, § 186 deliberate
slandering, § 187 slandering, $ 189. Deliberate slandering, defamation
and discrediting of the binational children participating in the proceedings
in the present case of international child abduction and the resulting boycott
of access by the German family law judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven
--- 20 pages documentation and presentation of evidence from 08.08.03. Criminal
charges against the family court judge Staubwasser of the district court
in Wilhelmshaven: German criminal code: § 83 preparation of high treason,
§ 86 distribution of propaganda material of organisations violating
the German constitution, § 132 pretending office titles, § 211
preparation and attempt of judiciary murder, § 234 Trafficking of humans,
§ 235 child abduction, § 239 preparation and attempt of deprivation
of freedom, § 241a political persecution. Preparation of high treason
and as well as distribution of propaganda material of organisations violating
the German constitution for protection and propaganda reasons of German crimes
against humanity, while with the pretension of office titles preparation
and attempt of deprivation of freedom and judiciary murder is effected in
order to promote the political persecution of children rights and human rights
activists while the illegal legalisation of trafficking of humans and child
abduction is used for the coercion and blackmailing of the petitioner and
father of the child in the present case of international child abduction
and the resulting boycott of access.
To date no correct confirmation has been received of receipt of the forwarded
documents neither has the complainant been notified according of the file
numbers of the charges which have been entered.
The usual legal delay to inform the petitioner at least
about the entry of the present document is two weeks.
Respectfully
Michael Hickman
|
|