|
28.10.2003
CASE OF HICKMAN vs. City OF WILHELMSHAVEN
at the district court of Wilhelmshaven FILE NUMBER 6 C 1411/03 (I) :
Legally valid demand for abstention –
Abstention from threatening and coercion
against the foreign left behind parent in the case of international child
abduction to Germany and the boycott of access that has followed by the administrative
officials of the city of Wilhelmshaven
Copies to:
FILE NUMBER 6 C 1411/03 (I)
district court of Wilhelmshaven
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs from the immigration office
of Wilhelmshaven,
You are hereby correctly informed of the legally binding abstention summons
in regards the immigration office of the city of Wilhelmshaven under the responsibility
of the mayor Eberhard Menzel.
Attention is explicitly drawn to the accompanying legally valid online documentation:
"Hickman’s Resource Centre"
http://www.michael-hickman.org
FILE NUMBER 32-10/04
immigration office of Wilhelmshaven,
Dear Mr. Janssen from the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs from the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven,
Hereby the official legally valid summons in regards to the legal matter
Hickman versus the city of Wilhelmshaven case file number 6C 1411/03 (I) to
abstain from threats and coercion against the foreign left behind parent,
who must reside in Germany on the grounds of custody and access legal processes
following international child abduction to Germany and the boycott of access
that has followed, is presented to the administrative officials of the city
of Wilhelmshaven.
The summons to abstain from threat and coercion by means of the deportation
of the foreign left behind parent from Germany by the immigration officials
of the city of Wilhelmshaven as documented to date is valid in particular
for Mr. Ralf Janssen, Frau Britta Kappe and Mr. Hofmann.
The immigration office of Wilhelmshaven has a delay of two weeks to officially
clearly make known if the threat of deportation from Germany by means of the
use of force is still officially supported.
The official decision and statement thereto is to be correctly sent to both
the petitioner as well as the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the case
6 C 1411/03 (I) Hickman versus the city of Wilhelmshaven.
The statement of the immigration office of the city of Wilhelmshaven is
to be correctly announced with the official stamp of the city of Wilhelmshaven
appearing on it.
The correct authentication with the official stamp of the city of Wilhelmshaven
is necessary due to a number of reasons in connection with the legal policy
dispute with the German authorities at hand:
--- authentication of documents in innerstate and international judicial
initiatives
--- The clarification of the responsibility and accountability in International
legal procedures for reparation payments.
--- For the integration in political initiatives at the international level
among other things at the responsible United Nations commissions
If no answer is received on the expiry of the delay a legal application
for protection against violence will be automatically entered on the grounds
that the application of violence that has been threatened by the administrative
officials of the city of Wilhelmshaven, here the immigration officials, is
intended to remain.
The mayor of the city of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel is legally liable
for the documented and future actions and working methods of the officials
of the immigration office of the city of Wilhelmshaven.
Reasoning
In the German history of international child abduction, the proceedings
of judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony already
have a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice
and due to certain traditional family law practice. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
Instead of correctly applying the international and national legal requirements
the immigration authority under the responsibility of the mayor Eberhard Menzel
acting as the German administrative authority applies incorrect working methods
so as to prevent the foreign left behind parent from realising the invitation
to report to the European parliament on the working methods of the German
officials.
It is clearly documented within the present case that the immigration office
of Wilhelmshaven, as an German administrative authority, has frequently and
in a multitude of ways acted to influence civil and criminal legal proceedings
as well as political initiatives against child abduction and boycott of access
Consult the following:
--- Documentation of the 20 June 2003:
Official Recommendation to disqualify the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven
from the nomination procedures of the Award for the Friendliest Immigration
Office 2004
---Documentation of the 27 June 2003 state-run child abduction and alienation
programs
--- Documentation of the 6 July 2003: state-run child abduction and alienation
programs / manipulation of family court proceedings by the children welfare
office
--- Documentation of the 18 August 2003: Official application for an unlimited
permanent residence permit.
--- Documentation of the 14.09.2003 Influencing German family law proceedings
on child abduction and boycott of access by influencing the residence status
by German administrative authorities
--- Documentation of the 23 September 2003 : deliberate disadvantaging of
foreign parents and grandparents in German family law matters by German administrative
authorities.
--- Documentation of the 28 September 2003 : Intention to refuse the
residence status for the foreign left-behind parent by the immigration office
of Wilhelmshaven during pending German family law proceedings on child abduction
to Germany and resulting boycott of access.
--- Documentation of the 3 October 2003 : Integration of the Online-Presence
"Hickman's Resource Center"
into the file of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven.
--- Documentation of the 6 October 2003 : Are the German administrative
authorities assisting the promotion of international child abduction to Germany
?
Compare the Hickman case study and the proceedings of Mr. Janßen from
the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven
--- Documentation of the 14 October 2003: Misusing the social status to
bully foreign left-behind parents by German administrative authorities during
family law proceedings in the wake of international child abduction to Germany.
--- Documentation of the 23 October 2003: The Janssen Letter Series #1:
German administrative authorities intend to hinder and prevent reporting
to a Committee of the European Parliament on the behaviour and proceedings
of German authorities in international child abduction and Boycott of access.
Repeatedly, the German administrative authorities, here the immigration
office of Wilhelmshaven, interact with the German judicial and social authorities
and work on the threat to interfere in the needed possibilities of presence
in Germany to disturb and to interfere in the legal and political as well
as in the public engagement for access with children abducted to Germany.
With the decision of the 16.10.2003 FILE NUMBER 32-10/04 (007264), the immigration
office of Wilhelmshaven intentionally interferes in the family court proceedings
at the family court of Wilhelmshaven concerning child abduction to Germany
and the boycott of access that follows to disadvantage and to discriminate
against the foreign father in the pending proceedings.
The immigration office of Wilhelmshaven with Mr. Janßen again documents
the intention to bully the foreign left behind parent and to distract him
from the family court proceedings by means of the continual threat of his
residence status.
Not only that the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven with Mr. Janßen
wants to influence pending innerstate proceedings, but the immigration office
of Wilhelmshaven with Mr. Janßen also wants to influence international
pending proceedings.
The immigration office of Wilhelmshaven is threatening to deport the foreign
left-behind parent from Germany with force while the foreign left-behind father
has been contacted by Members of the European Parliament for arranging a
hearing and meeting.
The immigration office of Wilhelmshaven is threatening to deport the foreign
left-behind parent from Germany with force while the foreign left-behind father
has pending proceedings at the European Court of Human Rights against Germany
due to incorrect proceedings of the German judicial, social and administrative
authorities.
Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven under the authority
of the mayor Eberhard Menzel is threatening to deport the left behind foreign
parent with force from Germany during pending family law proceedings which
would results in a ban to come back to Germany again; thus effectively preventing
the future contact with the children brought to Germany.
As documented the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven under the direction
of Mr Janßen applies, threats, intimidation and coercion against the
foreign left behind parent.
The competent and responsible major Eberhard Menzel who is also responsible
for the Children Welfare Office (Jugendamt) in accordance with the guideline
of the District Government in Hanover file number 407c-51020/2-32 "the professional
responsibility lies exclusively with the City", "ultimately the Mayor" is
legally liable for the documented incidents at the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven
as well as for the correct processing of the present official demands.
Mr Janßen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven has already been
correctly informed of the legal implications as well as the to in regards
compensation claims in the documentation of the 28 September 2003.
The Web address for the latest version of the overview to the working methods
of the immigrationofficeof the city of Wilhelmshaven are to be found under
the following URL:
http://www.michael-hickman.org/eng/admin/auslaend.html
Mr Janßen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven
has already been correctly informed of the integration of the online documentation
into the respective file on 3 October 2003.
Mr Janßen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven states under
FILE NUMBER 32-10/04 (007264) dated the 16.10.2003 :
To clarify the possibility to travel to Brussels I need the original official
invitation. I bring your attention to the fact that your tolerated residence
status expires if you leave the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany.
On the official request of Mr. Janssen from the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven
on the 20.10.2003 the official invitation of the European Parliament to the
foreign left-behind parent for reporting on the behaviour and proceedings
of German authorities has been sent to the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven.
Mr. Janssen from the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven states, that he
will hinder respectively prevent the invitation of the European parliament
to the foreign left-behind parent for reporting on the proceedings of German
authorities by directly influencing the pending family law proceedings with
the intended prohibition from re-entering Germany after the visit in Brussels,
Belgium.
Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven wants to thereby
avoid that the left behind foreign parent does not report over the discrimination,
threats, and coercion strategies of the German officials against the foreign
left behind parent and grandparents in cases of international child abduction
to Germany and the boycott of access that follows.
See also in this respect the online documentation:
German historyof international and innerstate child abduction/boycott of access
http://www.michael-hickman.org/eng/german_history/german_history_caboa.html
Mr. Janssen from the immigration office of the city of
Wilhelmshaven officially commits under breach of official duty the violation
of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, as well as of the
agreements signed by Germany on both the European and the international conventions
and denies all state obligation to assist the family reunion between the foreign
father and the binational children abducted to Germany in 1995.
Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
In the German history of international child abduction the proceedings of
judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony have already
a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice and
due to certain traditional family law practices. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
If German judicial, social and administrative authorities legalise child
abduction to Germany it results in the logical consequences that the German
authorities automatically confer an unlimited right of residence in Germany
to the foreign left-behind parents and grand-parents, in order to guarantee
the basics of a secured access with the children in accordance with innerstate
and international legal guidelines and obligations.
If the German authorities do not wish that foreign left-behind parents and
grand-parents are obtaining an unlimited right of residence in Germany, then
the German authorities should definitely refrain from legalising international
child abduction to Germany as a logical consequence.
In accordance with the constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany,
the German civil code and the European Human Right Convention both parents
have the right to unrestricted contact to their children. In particular the
state organs are to ensure the realisation of the right and the obligation
of access to the children for the non-custodian parent. The violation of
this state duty leads results in the obligation of state reparations, as
this was made unmistakable expressed by the European Court of Human Rights
in the Judgement of the 13 July 2000 in the legal matter Elsholz versus Germany
(DAVorm 2000, 679). With the judgement of 8 July 2003 in the legal matters
Sahin versus Germany and Sommerfeld versus Germany, the Grand Chamber as
the highest authority of the European Court for Human Rights confirmed that
it is the duty of Germany to pay compensation on the grounds of incorrect
proceedings in family law matters.
a) Hereby the official petition is entered at the parliament of Lower Saxony
to automatically confer an unlimited right of residence in Germany to the
foreign left-behind victimised parents and victimised grand-parents, in order
to prevent that German administrative authorities and acts interfere in pending
civil and criminal proceedings on child abduction and on boycott of access
as well as in the realisation of access between children brought to Germany
and their foreign left-behind victimised parents and victimised grand-parents.
b) Hereby the official petition is entered at the parliament of Lower Saxony
to automatically confer the German citizenship to the foreign left-behind
victimised parents and victimised grand-parents as a second citizenship, if
with holding children brought to Germany exceeds the delay of half a year,
in order to prevent that German administrative authorities and acts interfere
in pending civil and criminal proceedings on child abduction and on boycott
of access as well as in the realisation of access between children brought
to Germany and their foreign left-behind victimised parents and victimised
grand-parents.
The present Online documentation is part of the :
Reporting of the judicial/political scientific field research on the situation
of human rights, children rights, democracy and separation of powers in Germany
to the European Institutions and to the United Nations.
Hereby the official complaint for integrating the existing online documentation
(web page) on the respective judicial incident into the internet presence
of the parliament of Lower Saxony is entered.
Online-Documentation: German history of international
and innerstate child abduction/boycott of access.
http://www.michael-hickman.org/eng/admin/auslaend.html
Respectfully
Hochachtungsvoll
Michael Hickman
Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur
on the situation of
Human Rights in Germany
to the United Nations and
to the European Institutions
|