Michael Hickman
Wilhelmshaven
Amtsgericht Wilhelmshaven
Marktstraße 15 – 17
26382 Wilhelmshaven
Beschwerdezyklen beim Justizministerium von Niedersachsen AKTENZEICHEN 4121
E -S4. 54/03 und AKTENZEICHEN 3700 E - 204.37/03
Dr. Busch, Frau Bakker, Herr Wessels, Frau Ballnus
Am Waterloo Platz 1
30169 Hannover
poststelle@mj.niedersachsen.de
Niedersächsischer Landtag
Pet 5816/11/14
Pet 00447/08/15
Hinrich-Wilhelm-Kopf-Platz 1
30159 Hannover
Postfach 4407
30044 Hannover
vockert@vockert.de,
klaus.krumfuss@t-online.de,
info@frauke-heiligenstadt.de
Frau Kuck, Frau Busch
The Hague Conference on Private International Law Mr. Hans van Loon, Secretary
General
Prof. William Duncan
Deputy Secretary General
Permanent Bureau of
The Hague Conference
on Private International Law
Scheveningseweg 6
2517 KT Den-Haag
The Netherlands
Wd@hcch.nl
Hvl@hcch.nl
secretariat@hcch.net
Mr Sibusiso Bengu
The South African Ambassador to Germany
South African Embassy
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin
botschaft@suedafrika.org
The South African President
Mr. T.M. Mbeki
Office of the President
Private Bag X1000
Pretoria 0001
Südafrika
President@po.gov.za
Claudia Roth, MdB
Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Menschenrechtspolitik
Federal Government Commissioner for Human Rights Policy and Humanitarian
Aid
Auswärtiges Amt
Werderscher Markt 1
11013 Berlin
claudia.roth@bundestag.de
claudia.roth@wk.bundestag.de
|
Marita Sehn
Anke Schwarzbäck
Petition Committee at the German Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss des deutschen Bundestages
Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
Fax: 030 227 30015
marita.sehn@bundestag.de
klaus.hagemann@bundestag.de
Wolfgang Thierse
President of the German federal parliament
Präsident des Deutschen Bundestages
Personal Referent
Persönlicher Referent
Wolfram Kolodziej-Derfert
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
wolfgang.thierse@bundestag.de
praesident@bundestag.de
Deutscher Richterbund
Vorsitzender Wolfgang Arenhövel
Kronenstr. 73/74
10117 Berlin
Wolfgang.Arenhoevel@lg-os.niedersachsen.de
frank.sta.freiburg@t-online.de
jan.grotheer@fg.justiz.hamburg.de
elmar.herrler@olg-n.bayern.de
brigitte.kamphausen@lg-duisburg.nrw.de
BettinaLeetz@web.de
August-Wilhelm.Marahrens@lg-h.niedersachsen.de
dwtapper@rz-online.de
HanspeterT@t-online.de
info@drb.de
Institut für Menschenrechte
Institute for human rights, Berlin
info@institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de
Commission on Human Rights
Support Services Branch
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
1503@ohchr.org
Herr Ralf Janßen
Ausländeramt
Stadt Wilhelmshaven
Rathaus platz 1
26382 Wilhelmshaven
Fax 04421 16411267
ralf.janssen@stadt.wilhelmshaven.de
Klaus Stoltenberg
Menschenrechtsbeauftragter der
Bundesrepublik Deutschland
human rights commissioner of the
Federal Republic of Germany
Bundesministerium der Justiz
Mohrenstraße 37
10117 Berlin
poststelle@bmj.bund.de
|
|
20. NOVEMBER 2003
a) FILE NUMBER 6 C 1411/03 district court of Wilhelmshaven Racism and national
socialist motives in German state-run
child abduction and alienation programs
b) criminal charges against the director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Mr.Kahlen due to child trafficking in German family law matters
c) Petition to the German federal parliament for verification of the German
federal ministry of justice and immediate Dismissal from office of Klaus Stoltenberg,
human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany at the German
federal ministry of justice
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German
parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee at the German
federal parliament,
With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition proceedings
at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630 the herein documented
events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court
of Oldenburg are indicated as further proof for the establishing of an independent
enquête committee on the judiciary crimes against humanity by the practice
of German family law jurisdiction.
1) Why proceedings in child matters are refused, delayed, and manipulated,
e.g., at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court
of Oldenburg on child abduction and boycott of access, while expeditious proceedings
are presented to the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in the legal matter
of "alleged coloured hair" against the free press before the culminating
point of the election campaign 2002 ?
2) Why are there written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively invalid
for a certain population group due to sex, status, and nationality out of
political motivation?
3) Why in German family court proceedings in respect to international child
abduction to Germany and the boycott of access that follows, is intolerance
of foreigners, racism and discriminatory working methods to be observed, which
admit the conclusion of national socialistic thoughts and there resurrection?
Hereby the official request to integrate the accompanying online documentation
into the internet presence of the German Federal Parliament.Online documentation:http://www.michael-hickman.org
Case file number
6 C 1411/03 district court
Wilhelmshaven in the legal matter
Hickman versus the city of Wilhelmshaven
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
In the German history of international child abduction, the proceedings
of judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony already
have a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice
and due to certain traditional family law practice. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
The immigration authority of the city of Wilhelmshaven in the capacity of
German administrative authority has repeatedly intervened as documented with
aggressive methods and arbitrary measures according to various motives
--- Out of political motivation to cover and promote international child
abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access
--- Out of political motivation to discriminate and to disadvantage foreign
left behind parents and grandparents
In the case history of the present case the following behaviours of the
immigration office are documented:
1) Repeated attempts to deport the foreign left behind parent from Germany
during pending family court proceedings in regards to access to the children
abducted to Germany.
2) Repeated threats and coercion against the foreign left behind parent
with the explicit threat of the application of force to be used in deportation
as well as the explicit threat that following deportation a re-entry to Germany
would be permanently refused in order to prevent contact between the children
removed to Germany and the foreign left behind parent.
3) The refusal to allow re-entry to Germany in order to prevent that the
foreign left behind parent from answering the invitation of the European Parliament
to make presentation on the working methods of the German authorities in
regard to international child abduction and the boycott of access.
4) The targeted arbitrary measures to restrict mobility with the intention
of deprivation of liberty and of political persecution, so as to prevent,
that the foreign left behind parent is able to travel to Brussels, Belgium,
in order to inform the European Parliament about the working methods of the
German authorities in regard to international child abduction and boycott
of access. On one side, the foreign left behind parent, who has been resident
in Germany since July 2001 to apply for and implement access to children removed
to Germany via family court proceedings, has had absolutely no territorial
restrictions placed on his mobility so far. On the other hand, the immigration
office of the city of Wilhelmshaven as a German administrative authority has
now after the official invitation of the European Parliament to the foreign
left behind parent, has informed that the foreign left behind parent is not
allowed at all to leave the German Land of Lower Saxony.
These working methods of German administrative officials are unworthy in
a democratic society in particular in a German democratic, constitutional
society, one that in it’s constitution officially states that, it serves the
principle of freedom in the world within a unified Europe.
The documented deliberate violation of the inner state and international
rights as well as the deliberate disrespect of international law conventions
presents a legitimate need for legal protection.
Mr Janssen of the immigration office of the city of Wilhelmshaven with made
the following official statement on the 16 October under the file number 32
– 10/04 (007264):
The immigration office of the city of Wilhelmshaven is naturally responsible
the residence status of foreigner citizens living in Wilhelmshaven. The residence
of your divorced ex-wife as well as her children because of their German citizenship
do not fall in the area of responsibility of the immigration authority.
The immigration office of the city of Wilhelmshaven answered the questions
presented in the submission of the 6 October 2003 in that manner: Do the German
administrative authorities offer assistance so as to promote international
child abduction to Germany?
b) Mr. Janssen of the immigration authority has to correctly provide proof
that the immigration of the city of Wilhelmshaven has worked in a fair manner
in this family legal case resulting from child abduction and boycott of access.
This means that Mr Janssen of the immigration authority of the city of Wilhelmshaven
has to correctly substantiate by means of the file and independent research
that the immigration authority has made equitable compensation to cause the
equal amount of problems for the German parent who abducted the children
to Germany and subsequently boycotted access, during the family law procedures
at the district court of Wilhelmshaven as he has done for the foreign left
behind parent.
C) Furthermore Mr Janssen of the immigration authority has to correctly
substantiate and to prove, when and how the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven
informed the left behind parent of the abduction of the binational children
to Germany and their place of residence and what administrative measures
the immigration authority took to prevent the accustomisation and alienation
of the binational children following their abduction to Germany. In addition
Mr Janssen must correctly substantiate and to prove what measures were taken
for the return of the children to their accustomed place of residence abroad.
The documented official statement of the immigration office of the city
of Wilhelmshaven acting as German administrative Authority in the context
of the social reality of international child abduction to Germany and the
boycott of access that follows proves that the city of Wilhelmshaven under
the competencies and responsibility of the mayor Eberhard Menzel apparently
and deliberately does not show sufficient remembrance work in regards to
the German history in the education and training of it’s own officials.
Only so it can be explained, that official statements by employees of German
authorities can clearly demonstrate traits of national socialist ideology.
To a given point of time it will have to be verified with further legal
remedies available, in how far negative sanctions among others have to be
applied in regard to relevant criminal prosecution against the re-activation
of national socialism body of thought as well as against the propagation
of propaganda material of organisations violating the German constitution
for the protection of democracy, constitutionality and human rights.
The German administrative authorities, here the immigration office of the
city of Wilhelmshaven as documented names the children removed to Germany
as "German children".
To date neither the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven nor the responsible
mayor Eberhard Menzel have apologised for these official racist and discriminatory
statements.
In the German history of deliberate aggressive and anti-human violations
of international law, the Nazis intentionally apply state organised child
abduction and alienation in order to implement their national socialist demographic
and racial political goals.
Thereby children abducted into the Third Reich are subjected to alienation
and programming in order to speed up the wanted process of Germanisation.
Socio-political factors as backgrounds are among others that the implementation
of state political aims (e.g. war of aggression and conquering, extension
of the available soil for the people with simultaneous demand for domination
by the master race) is opposed by an insufficient birth rate and that the
elevation of the own race as the superior declared race demands the oppression
and eradication of foreign race characteristics.
The content analysis of literature about the state run child abduction and
alienation program of the Nazis provides the following aspects whose re-appearances
within the current practice by German authorities in international child abduction
and boycott of access has to be checked on parallels :
--- Child abduction
--- Alienation
--- Racism
--- Germanisation
--- Manipulation of files
Lebensborn means "spring of life". The "Lebensborn" project was one of most
secret and terrifying Nazi projects. [...] From 1939, one of the most horrible
side of the Lebensborn policy was the kidnapping of children "racially goods"
in the eastern occupied countries. These kidnappings were organized by the
SS in order to take by force children who matched the Nazi's racial criteria
(blond hair, blue eyes, etc....). Thousands of children were transferred to
the "Lebensborn" centers in order to be "Germanized". In these centers, everything
was done to force the children to reject and forget their birth parents.
[...] It is nearly impossible to know how much children were kidnapped in
the eastern occupied countries. In 1946, it was estimated that more than 250,000
were kidnapped and sent by force to Germany. [...] It is known that several
German families refused to give back the children they had received from
the Lebensborn centers. In some cases, the children themselves refused to
come back in their original family: they were victims of the Nazi propaganda
and believed that they were pure Germans. It is also known that thousand of
children not "good enough" to be Germanized were simply exterminated.
The "Lebensborn"; Jewish virtual library, A division
of the American-Israel Cooperative Enterprise
Lebensborn-Kinder waren das Ergebnis eines geheimen Planes der SS. Um den
"arischen" Nachwuchs zu sichern, sollten ausgesuchte Mütter ein Kind
für den Führer zur Welt zu bringen...
Aber auf viele dieser Kinder wartete ein trauriges Schicksal. Wurzellos
wuchsen die Jungen und Mädchen in Pflegefamilien oder Waisenheimen auf,
ohne je etwas über ihre Herkunft zu erfahren. Mindestens 5.000 von ihnen
sind noch heute auf der Suche nach ihren leiblichen Eltern oder nahen Verwandten.
Manche haben nur durch Zufall etwas über ihre wahre Identität herausgefunden.
Die SS entwickelte ein spezielles System, um die Herkunft der Kinder zu
verschleiern.
Niemand von außen sollte Einblick erhalten. Bei Kriegsende wurden
angeblich fast alle Unterlagen durch die SS oder die Alliierten vernichtet.
Die Organisation „Lebensborn e.V. wurde auf Veranlassung
von Heinrich Himmler von zehn namentlich nicht bekannten SS-Führern
am 12. Dez. 1935 in Berlin gegründet. Organisatorisch war Lebensborn
e.V. [...] zunächst dem Rasse- und Siedlungsamt der SS und dem SS-Wirtschafts-Verwaltungs-Hauptamt
unterstellt, wurde dann aber 1938 als das „Amt 1b des SS-Hauptamtes“ dem persönlichen
Stab des Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler eingegliedert. [...] Zielsetzung
des Vereins war der Kampf gegen die Abtreibung und die Erhöhung der
Geburtenrate.
Wollte Lebensborn e. V. den Übermenschen züchten
?, Von Richard Beiderbeck
Am 2.1. 1975 erschien in der Südwestpresse ein Artikel von Rolf Henkel
über die Untersuchungen von Dr. Theodor Hellbrügge, Professor für
Kinderheilkunde, der nach dem Krieg in der Umgebung von München ein Lebensborn-Heim
besucht hatte. Er fand lauter schöne, blonde, blauäugige Kinder.
Sie hatten aber alle eine teilnahmslosen Gesichtsausdruck und konnten nicht
lachen. Zwanzig Jahre später untersuchte Hellbrügge die Kinder erneut
und fand bei ihnen „eine Häufung neurotischer Verwahrlosung, sexuelle
Störungen und kriminelle Gefährdung. Keines der Lebensborn-Kinder
hatte eine abgeschlossene Volksschulbildung oder Lehre, das Intelligenzniveau
der schönen Blonden war besonders niedrig, im Leistungsbereich wurden
schwere Störungen registriert.
ZDF Online, 16. März 2000
Wollte Lebensborn e. V. den Übermenschen züchten
?, Von Richard Beiderbeck
Die Geburtenrate stieg zwar, aber der begonnene Krieg "fraß seine
Kinder" und die "arische Elite" wuchs nur mäßig. So griff Himmler
zu drastischeren Mitteln und befahl seinen Soldaten jedes "arisch" aussehende
Kind zur "Eindeutschung" in den besetzten Ländern, wie Polen, Frankreich,
Jugoslawien "mitzunehmen". Sie entführten blonde, blauäugige Kinder
einfach von der Straße weg oder nahmen sie den Eltern, unter falschen
Versprechungen, weg. In den Nachkriegswirren, im "kalten Krieg" fanden die
wenigsten Eltern ihre Kinder wieder. Sie gingen als Kleinkind, wurden vom
Lebensborn an verschiedenen Pflegestellen vermittelt, adoptiert und konnten
sich später kaum noch an ihre richtigen Eltern erinnern. Ein entführtes
Kind, bekam einen neuen Namen, musste unter Strafe nur noch deutsch sprechen,
wurde vermessen und in "arische Klassen" eingestuft.
Lebensborn e.V., R. Abe, Shoa.de
Lebensborn nahm jedes Kind von jedem Juden, Partisan und jedes blonde, blauäugige
Kind, das sie schnappen konnten in den eroberten Ländern. Das ist der
Grund, warum man so wenige junge Kinder auf den Holokaust-Photos sehen kann.
Diejenigen, die den „Arier“-Kriterien entsprachen, wurden „guten Nazis“
zur Adoption gegeben. Der Rest wurde getötet, oder, wenn sie alt genug
waren, sterilisiert und zur Sklaven-Arbeit verwendet."
Wollte Lebensborn e. V. den Übermenschen züchten
?, Von Richard Beiderbeck
Where the Holocaust was an attempt to eliminate the racially inferior, Lebensborn,
which translates to “wellspring of life,” was an integral part of the Nazi
plan to produce a master race. [...] Himmler founded Lebensborn on December
12, 1935, the same year the Nuremberg laws outlawed intermarriage with Jews
and others who were deemed inferior. For decades, Germany’s birthrate was
decreasing — Himmler’s goal was to reverse the decline and increase the Germanic/Nordic
population of Germany to 120 million. [...]
Ultimately, the Germans resorted to stealing racially acceptable children
from occupied territories. Up to 100,000 thousand children may have been stolen
from Poland alone. Some of these children were war orphans, but it is well
documented that many were stolen from their parents’ arms. The criteria were
blond hair and blue or green eyes. [...]
Some of the children kidnapped in other countries who were living with families
throughout Germany, were repatriated to their native countries. Unfortunately,
many were too Germanic to fit in. The Lebensborn children are now 55 to 65
years old. For many of them, their parents’ identities remained a mystery
and their journeys of rediscovery have revealed horrible truths about their
origins. Searching for love, they have found heartache ... [...]
We wanted to do this story for two reasons: It’s a very interesting piece
of history that is not well-known, and the human drama of the children of
Lebensborn — how they have led such sad lives — is heartbreaking. [...] The
Lebensborn program was a very important element of the Nazis’ overall plan
for world domination. Reichsfuehrer Heinrich Himmler was concerned that Aryans
had the lowest birth rate of all Germans. And he was doubly concerned that,
as the Nazis systematically murdered millions of Jews and other “undesirables,”
ultimately they needed to be replaced. It was the flipside of the Holocaust,
if you will — killing off one group of people while attempting to increase
the population of another. [...]Most of the children who were born in the
Lebensborn program are still alive and many continue to suffer from their
deep psychological scars. [...] My first standup was at Dachau concentration
camp, preserved today as a monument to those who died there and as a way of
reminding all of us who live in the present not to repeat the past. We wanted
to make the point that Hitler and Himmler’s plan to create a “super race”
had two sides. The one represented by Dachau was the murder of all people
judged unfit. The other lay only a few kilometers away from the concentration
camp — the first Lebensborn maternity home established to help rear the special
children who were to take the place of those murdered. The standup location
pointed up the two-headed hydra of this particular monster.
The ‘Master Race’ Nazi Program Attempted to Create
Racially Pure Children, 27 April 2000, abcnews.com
Himmler considered no method too extreme in the pursuit of his lunatic goal:
the propagation of the Germanic master race. The SS also kidnapped Aryan-looking
children from Poland and other occupied lands and brought them to the Lebensborn
centers across the Third Reich, where they were "Germanized" and turned over
to Nazi foster parents.
Hitler's Children, They were the offspring of a Nazi program to create a
racially pure 'Master Race.' Behind the painful search to discover their roots.
Joshua Hammer,
Newsweek International , 20 March 2000
While many Aryan children were being conceived and born under the Lebensborn
program, authorities were not satisfied with the rate of population increase
of Aryan children and expanded the Lebensborn program into occupied territories.
Himmler (1943) ordered the international kidnapping of children from those
countries they had conquered. In a speech to the SS Group leaders in Poznan,
Himmler ordered those children meeting racial qualifications be abducted from
families in conquered countries, particularly Poland. These children
were placed with German families in Germany.
Lebensborn: from Inception to the New Millennium; Germanization of Abducted
Children – Alienation & Estrangement; Maureen Dabbagh; 2000
The children abducted under the policy and programs of the Third Reich,
specifically the SS, fell under the Lebensborn program. The intent was to
“Germanize” the children. German authorities believed that younger
children would acclimate easier than did older children. As such, age
limits were discussed in regards to those children that should be kidnapped.
Lebensborn: from Inception to the New Millennium; Germanization of Abducted
Children –
Alienation & Estrangement; Maureen Dabbagh; 2000
Abducted children taken into the Lebensborn program were systematically
“Germanized” by programming [brainwashing] the child into what the authorities
expected him or her to be. Names were changed and they were encouraged not
to speak any language other than German. The children were not allowed
to contact their families and were often told that their families no longer
existed or that their families did not want them.
Lebensborn: from Inception to the New Millennium; Germanization
of Abducted Children – Alienation & Estrangement; Maureen Dabbagh; 2000
While the actual numbers of children internationally abducted through the
Lebensobrn program are unknown, estimates reach as high as a quarter of a
million. Ironically, even after Europe was liberated, many German families
refused to return the kidnapped children to their families, citing they were
too ‘Germanized” to return.
Lebensborn: from Inception to the New Millennium; Germanization of Abducted
Children –
Alienation & Estrangement; Maureen Dabbagh; 2000
The lesson might be that the creation of a “super race” as planned by Himmler
and Hitler was a terribly demented idea, indicative of the extent of their
obsession with Aryan superiority and Nazi supremacy. And that the terrible
results of Nazi Germany continue to reverberate even today — as evidenced
in the shattered lives of the Lebensborn children.
The ‘Master Race’ Nazi Program Attempted to Create Racially Pure Children,
27 April 2000, abcnews.com
If there is any lesson in our report it is the same one Harry Phillips and
I have tried to highlight in our previous work about the Nazi era — best expressed
by the philosopher George Santayana who said, “Those who cannot remember
the past are doomed to repeat it.”
The ‘Master Race’ Nazi Program Attempted to Create Racially Pure Children,
27 April 2000, abcnews.com
It would be reasonably expected that you as "honest and decent Germans"
certainly know German history.
Nevertheless, for completion of the file, the background and content of
the nazi child abduction, alienation and Germanisation programs will be explicitly
named.
In the first quarter of the 20th century, the Nazis conducted a state run
child abduction and alienation program as part of their Germanisation plan.
As a result of the Nuremberg Trials, and after nearly two years of study,
the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted on 9th December, 1948,
a Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In
this Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent
to destroy, in whole or in part, a national ethnical, racial or religious
group, as such : [...] forcibly transferring children of the group to another
group. Those who cannot learn from the past are condemned to repeat it. In
the last quarter of the 20th century, the German government does not prosecute
those German judicial, social and administrative German state authorities
which are involved in legalising international child abduction to Germany
and resulting boycott of access.
A. OUTLINE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
2. The acts, conduct, plans and enterprises charged in Paragraph 1 of this
Count were carried out as part of a systematic program of genocide, aimed
at the destruction of foreign nations and ethnic groups, in part by murderous
extermination, and in part by elimination and suppression of national characteristics.
The object of this program was to strengthen the German nation and the so-called
‘ Aryan ’ race at the expense of such other nations and groups by imposing
Nazi and German characteristics upon individuals selected therefrom (such
imposition being hereinafter called ‘ Germanization ‘) ; and by the extermination
of ‘ undesirable ’ racial elements. This program was carried out in part by
(a) Kidnapping the children of foreign nationals in order to select for
Germanization those who were considered of ‘ racial value ’ ; [...]
(c) Taking away, for the purpose of exterminating or Germanization, infants
born to Eastern workers in Germany ; [...]
The Main Staff Office of the Reichscommissioner for the Strengthening of
Germanism was the relevant directing body. It operated under the supervision
of Heinrich Himmler, Reichsfuehrer of the S.S. and Chief of the Nazi Police.
It was responsible for, among other things, [...] kidnapping of so-called
“ racially valuable ” children for Germanization, [...]
The leading position of the Main Staff Office was established by the Tribunal
in the following terms : “ The Main Staff Office was actually the directing
head of the whole Germanization program, co-ordinating the activities of the
other organizations. Before the end of the war, the activities of the Main
Staff Office involved, among other things, [...] the kidnapping of children
[...]
The office for Repatriation of Ethnic Germans (VOMI) was responsible for,
among other things, the selection of “ ethnic Germans,” [...]
In addition, it participated in the compulsory Germanization of “ ethnic
Germans ” and people of German descent, [...] and in the kidnapping of foreign
children.
The “ Lebensborn ” Society existed long before the war and was primarily
concerned with running a maternity home. It was contended by the prosecution
that, within the racial scheme for annihilating nations under German rule,
it was responsible for kidnapping of foreign children for the purpose of Germanization.
[...]
Special treatment of racially valuable children. [...]
Children of such institutions, if not older than approximately 10 years,
are to be transferred to German educational institutions. [...]
In all cases of eviction of classes which are racially equivalent to us
and valuable, the possibility of a retention of the children and their special
education is to be considered.
Apart from this school there are to be no schools at all in the East. Parents,
who from the beginning want to give their children better schooling in the
elementary school as well as later on in a higher school must make an application
to the Higher SS and the police leaders. The first consideration in dealing
with this application will be whether the child is racially perfect and conforming
to our conditions. If we acknowledge such a child to be as of our blood, the
parents will be notified that the child will be sent to a school in Germany
and that it will permanently remain in Germany. [...]
The parents of such children of good blood will be given the choice of either
giving away their child ; they will then probably produce no more children
so that the danger of this subhuman people of the East obtaining a class of
leaders which, since it would be equal to us, would also be dangerous for
us, will disappear ; or else the parents pledge themselves to go to Germany
and to become loyal citizens there. The love towards their children whose
future and education depends on the loyalty of the parents will be a strong
weapon in dealing with them. [...]
Apart from examining the applications made by parents for better schooling
of their children, there will be an annual sifting of all children of the
General Government between the ages of six and ten in order to separate the
racially valuable and non-valuable. The ones who are considered racially valuable
will be treated in the same way as the children who are admitted on the basis
of the approved application of their parents. " [...]
Kidnapping of Alien Children
One of, the measures undertaken by the accused in order to carry out the
programme of Genocide, consisted in forcibly removing from occupied territories
children regarded as racially fit to be Germanized. This policy was defined
by Himmler in a letter of 18th June, 1941, where, speaking of Polish children,
he said the following :
I would consider it right if small children, of Polish families, who show
especially good racial characteristics were apprehended and educated by us
in special children’s institutions and children’s homes which must not be
too large. The apprehension of the children would have to be explained with
endangered health . . .
After half a year the genealogical tree and documents of descent of those
children who prove to be acceptable should be procured. After altogether one
year it should be considered to give such children as foster children to
childless families of good race. . . .”
Later, in 1943, Himmler formulated this policy in the following terms :
[...]
Obviously in such a mixture of peoples there will always be some racially
good types. Therefore I think that it is our duty to take their children with
us, to remove them from their environment, if necessary by robbing or stealing
them. . . . Either we win over any good blood that we can for ourselves and
give it a place in our people or . . . we destroy this blood. . . .” [...]
In order to be able to regain for German Folkdom those children, whose racial
appearance indicates nordic parents, it is necessary that the children who
are in former Polish orphanages and with Polish foster-parents, are subjected
to a racial and psychological process of selection. These children, who are
considered to be racially valuable to German Folkdom, shall be Germanized.
. . .” [...]
At the same time orders were issued by Himmler and carried out by the Main
Staff Office, RKFDV, regarding the treatment of children of unsuitable parents.
Children of politically unreliable parents on account of their having shown
hostile feelings towards Polish citizens of German stock, were to be segregated
from their parents. They were to be put in local German public schools and
included in the Hitler Youth organisation. Higher education was prohibited.
Evidence was produced to the effect that, in handling this matter, a steady
correspondence developed between Himmler’s office, RUSHA, VOMI and the Main
Staff Office, involving the accused. It was proved that, among others, Hofmann
and Hildebrandt as heads of RUSHA, were acquainted with all the details in
the summer of 1941, and took part in the kidnapping. Schwalm was another direct
participant. Of the officials of VOMI evidence showed that Lorenz and Brueckner
were also active in numerous cases. [...]
The reception into the care of the NSV or of Lebensborn of the child of
good racial stock will necessitate in most cases its separation from the
mother who remains at her working place. Particularly for this reason the
reception into that care of the child of good racial stock is only possible
with the mother’s consent. She has to be made to consent to it through interpretations
by the caretaking office which set forth the advantages but not the ends of
this procedure. . . .” [...]
Taking away of Infants of Eastern Workers
As distinct from the kidnapping of grown up children for Germanization,
the accused were involved in a programme of stealing newly born infants of
Eastern workers brought to Germany as forced or slave labourers in factories
and agriculture. This was done in connection with the abortion policy, in
cases where pregnancy was not discovered until it was too late to perform
an abortion or the child was born before pregnancy was discovered. The following
instructions were given in a Decree of 27th July, 1943 : [...]
The children born by the foreign working women may in no case be attended
by German institutions, be taken into German children’s homes, or else be
reared and educated together with German children. Therefore, special infant-attendance-institutions
of the simplest kind, so-called ‘ Foreigners’ children’s nursing homes,’ have
been erected within the billets where these children of foreigners are attended
to by female members of the respective nationality. . . . It is therefore
important that the children of foreigners who, partly, are of a similar race
and bearers of German blood and may therefore be considered as valuable are
not assigned to the ‘ Foreigners’ children’s nursing home,’ but if possible,
they are to be saved for the German nationality and to be educated as German
children.
B. NOTES ON THE CASE
As a result, and after nearly two years of study, the General Assembly of
the United Nations adopted on 9th December, 1948, a Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The Convention contains 19 Articles,
the most important of which read as follows :
" In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national ethnical, racial or
religious group, as such : [...]
forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. [...]
As can be seen the offences enumerated in Article 2 of this Convention cover
practically the entire field tried in this case. The most conspicuous instances
are [...] the measures undertaken for forced Germanization, including the
kidnapping or taking away of children and infants, [...]
The general concept of genocide has been recently redefined by Professor
Lemkin in the following terms :
“ There are three basic phases of life in a human group ; physical existence,
biological continuity (through procreation), and spiritual or cultural expression.
Accordingly, the attacks on these three basic phases of the life of a human
group can be qualified as physical, bio-logical, or cultural genocide. It
is considered a criminal act to cause death to members of the above-mentioned
groups directly or indirectly, to sterilize through compulsion, to steal children,
or to break up families.
In the proceedings against Ulrich Greifelt and others of the UNITED STATES
MILITARY TRIBUNAL in Nuremberg from 10. October 1947 until 10. March 1948
leading SS-members from the group around Heinrich Himmler have been condemned
due to crimes against humanity among others on account of child abduction.
Official applications to the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Hereby is entered the official legal application to the district court of
Wilhelmshaven, the racist and discrimination oriented behavioural manner of
the German administrative authority, here the immigration office of the city
of Wilhelmshaven and the German social authority, here the child welfare office
of the city of Wilhelmshaven to correctly give assistance and to bring the
responsible to account.
As documented and proven the district court of Wilhelmshaven under the moral
and political leadership of the responsible director Mr Kahlen lets the applicant
as well as the taxpayer invest in procedures in regard to access, in procedures
in which court ordered access with the children abducted to Germany were deliberately
not enforced and the case was deliberately delayed for a period of one year.
As documented and proven the district court of Wilhelmshaven under the moral
and political leadership of the responsible director Mr Kahlen wants the applicant
the foreign left behind children’s father now to enter into civil procedures,
against the incorrect working methods of German authorities in regards to
international child abduction and the boycott of access that has followed.
The documented demand for payment of money by the district court of Wilhelmshaven
of the 17.11.2003 case file number 6C 1411/03 (I) demand file number 1628900063684
is rejected (See for reasoning the criminal charges laid against the director
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr Kahlen on the grounds of child trafficking)
and that the procedures are to be correctly continued.
Hereby the official legal application is made to the district court of Wilhelmshaven
to respect the international and human rights duty of Germany and the and
the German state officials to ensure that the German parent respect the common
children as the binational children that they are.
For that purpose the German parent that abducted the children born abroad
to Germany is to be ordered to correctly fill out the official applications
for passports for their land of birth South Africa and to return them to the
district court of Wilhelmshaven together with the applicable photographs so
as to correctly secure the right of the children to their identity.
The official application forms are presented in the annex of the document
submitted to the district court of Wilhelmshaven under the previously quoted
file number.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner of the
child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt
to incite the petitioner and father of the child to acts of criminal offences
in trafficking of children and humans by intentionally generating turnover
and profit of judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German authorities
in child abduction, boycott of access and misuse of authority.
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the district court of
Wilhelmshaven,
criminal charges against the director of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen due to child trafficking
In accordance with the official guideline of the German federal ministry
of Justice (FILE NUMBER R B 3 - to: 9311/22-2-23 335/2033 from 14 April 2003)
as well as in accordance with the criminal law procedure regulations criminal
charges against the director of the distinct court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen
are entered directly at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the director
of the distinct court of Wilhelmshaven due to the documented attempt of inciting
the applicant to the criminal offence of child trafficking within the "Case
of Hickman vs. City of Wilhelmshaven."
Reasoning and Facts
The district court of Wilhelmshaven deliberately disrespects the official
legal demands to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner and father
of the child to the criminal offence of child trafficking.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner/citizen/father
of the child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt
to incite the petitioner/citizen to acts of criminal offences in trafficking
of children and humans by intentionally generating turnover and profit of
judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German authorities in
child abduction, boycott of access and misuse of authority.
As documented and proven the district court of Wilhelmshaven under the moral
and political leadership of the responsible director Mr Kahlen lets the applicant
as well as the taxpayer invest in procedures in regard to access, in procedures
in which court ordered access with the children abducted to Germany were deliberately
not enforced and the case was deliberately delayed for a period of one year.
As documented and proven the district court of Wilhelmshaven under the moral
and political leadership of the responsible director Mr Kahlen wants the applicant
the foreign left behind children’s father now to enter into civil procedures,
against the incorrect working methods of German authorities in regards to
international child abduction and the boycott of access that has followed.
Against the legal demand to refrain the district court of Wilhelmshaven
charges the applicant with the costs for the proceedings as per the demand
the 17.11.2003 case file number 6 C 1411/03 (I) demand file number 1628900063684.
As documented and proven :
-- The applicant and children‘s father does not kidnap children.
--The applicant and children‘s father does not legalise child abduction.
--The applicant and children‘s father does not engage in child trafficking.
--The applicant and children‘s father does not legalise child trafficking.
The applicant and children‘s father openly speaks out against the resurrection
of national socialistic school of thought and action in the Federal Republic
of Germany, to which the nazi child abduction program belongs, which was judged
to be a crime against humanity by the Nuremberg war tribunal.
At a given time point you will be correctly informed in respect to further
demands regarding reparations payments via the civil legal route against the
moral and politically responsible director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Mr Kahlen on the grounds of the documented incorrect working methods.
To date the moral and politically responsible director of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven Mr Kahlen has deliberately not made a statement to the list
of questions that follow in respect of the incorrect working methods of the
district court of Wilhelmshaven in regards to international child abduction
to Germany and the boycott of access that has followed.
How is it to be explained that the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the
German judicial reality, family court proceedings in respect to access following
international child abduction to Germany are deliberately delayed for a period
of one year?
How is it to be explained, that the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the
German judicial reality that the court ordered access was deliberately not
enforced for a period of one year?
How is it to be explained, that the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the
German judicial reality with private money and with tax payers money has financed
family court proceedings over the period of one year in which were delayed
and court decisions were not enforced? Which ground for existence arise out
of such behaviour by a German official in a democratic constitutional state
with the duty to deliver a fair trail?
How is it to be explained, that the German family judge Staubwasser of the
district court of Wilhelmshaven arbitrarily excludes access for the period
for half a year on top of access that did not occur, whereas immediately
previously for a period of one year court ordered access was deliberately
not enforced?
How is it to be explained, that the German family judge Staubwasser of the
district court of Wilhelmshaven who gives as reasoning for his arbitrary exclusion
of access that he had followed the recommendation made by the psychological
expert, so as not to endanger the well being of the children, at the end of
the period of exclusion of half a year, deliberately does not protect and
ensure the well being of the children?
How is it to be explained, that the German family judge Staubwasser of the
district court of Wilhelmshaven as documented repeatedly delayed the proceedings
regarding access which has followed international child abduction to Germany?
Declaration of intent of Mr Kahlen director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
PLEASE DELETE WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE
1 a) Mr. Kahlen director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven hereby officially
declares, that he collaborates with judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
in particular with the incorrect working methods of the judge Staubwasser
in regards to international child abduction and the boycott of access.
1 b) Mr Kahlen, director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven hereby officially
declares, that he does not collaborate with the German family judges of the
district court of Wilhelmshaven, but that he distances himself from
the responsible family judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven. To officially
and correctly distance himself from these family judges of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven, Mr Kahlen will institute legal measures against the responsible
German family judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, so that these
German family judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven can correctly
assume their fully responsibility for their documented incorrect actions
in this case of international child abduction, boycott of access and alienation.
2 a) Mr Kahlen, director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven hereby officially
declares, that he collaborates with the SS leadership out of the group of
Heinrich Himmler, who were found guilty of crimes against humanity at the
Nuremberg trails in particular because of child abduction, boycott of access
alienation and forced Germanisation (forced nazification)
2b)Mr Kahlen, director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven hereby officially
and explicitly declares that he distances himself from the nazi regime and
the national socialistic school of thought. To document that he distances
himself from the national socialistic school of thought in the judicial practice
and legal reality of the Federal Republic of Germany, Mr Kahlen the director
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven will institute legal measures against
all still living jurists, who served the nazi regime. On the grounds of his
peculiar understanding of democracy and the constitutional state principle,
Mr Kahlen director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, is to institute
further legal measures against all jurists of the Federal Republic of Germany
that found jurists of the nazi regime not guilty.
Hereby the demand is made to correctly answer the demands already made on
the official letter head of the director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
together with the official seal of the city of Wilhelmshaven.
The correct reporting back is necessary due to a number of reasons in connection
with the legal and political dispute at hand:
--- The clarification of the responsibility and accountability in International
legal procedures for reparation payments.
--- For the integration in political initiatives at the international level
among other things at the responsible United Nations commissions
Dear Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven,
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven.
As documented in the file there are still outstanding answers to official
requests made.
The following letter of intent is to be correctly delivered to the district
court of Wilhelmshaven under the case file number quoted above with a copy
to the applicant and foreign left behind parent within the usual legal delay
of two weeks.
Declaration of intent of Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven
PLEASE DELETE WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE
1 a) Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven hereby declares,
that he collaborates with fellow officials of the city of Wilhelmshaven, who
twice register binational children who have been removed to Germany in Wilhelmshaven,
without correctly informing the foreign left behind parent thereof.
1 b) Mr Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven hereby officially
declares, that he does not collaborate with fellow officials of the city of
Wilhelmshaven, who twice registered the binational children that were abducted
to Germany, without informing the foreign left behind parent. Mr. Janssen
of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven will correctly name the responsible
officials of the city of Wilhelmshaven to the district court of Wilhelmshaven
as well as to the foreign left behind parent. Mr Janssen of the immigration
office of Wilhelmshaven officially declares, that he distances himself from
the responsible officials of the city of Wilhelmshaven that registered the
children abducted to Germany in Wilhelmshaven. To officially and correctly
distance himself from these fellow officials of the city of Wilhelmshaven,
Mr Janssen will institute legal measures against the responsible fellow officials
of the city of Wilhelmshaven, so that these fellow officials can correctly
assume responsibility for their documented actions.
2a) Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven hereby officially
declares that he agrees with the practice of officials of the Federal Republic
of Germany in the national socialist orientated treatment of people in particular
in regards to the aspect of child abduction and alienation programs.
2b) Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven hereby officially
declares that he does not agree with the practice of officials of the Federal
Republic of Germany in the nationalsicialistic orientated treatment of people
in particular in regards to the aspect of child abduction and alienation programs.
To officially document that he distances himself from national socialist
body of thought in the practice of officials of the Federal Republic of Germany,
Mr Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven officially excuses
himself for naming the children "German" who were abducted to Germany and
donates over the next three years half of his annual salary to the Wilhelmshaven
Himmler child abduction fund. In addition, he enters criminal charges in accordance
with the German criminal process regulations against himself at the responsible
authority.
Hereby the demand is made to correctly answer the demands already made on
the official letterhead of the city of Wilhelmshaven, together with the official
seal of the city of Wilhelmshaven.
The correct reporting back is necessary due to a number of reasons in connection
with the legal and political dispute at hand:
--- The clarification of the responsibility and accountability in International
legal procedures for reparation payments.
--- For the integration in political initiatives at the international level
among other things at the responsible United Nations commissions
Dear Mayor Eberhard Menzel,
Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat
it.
As already illustrated and documented it would appear that some official
employees of the city of Wilhelmshaven have a quasi disturbed relationship
to German History.
There is a collective responsibility for German history and for the respect
of the victims of German history for which the elected representative of the
people in this instance the mayor Eberhard Menzel who has the authority and
the responsibility.
The mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel officially declared on the 2
September 2003 his readiness to support if needs be the possible exhibition
to Nazi injustice and Nazi justice at the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
In this regard the following exhibitions are officially requested:
a) Judiciary under National Socialism - About Crimes in the name of the
German people
b) Psychiatry within the Third Reich in Lower Saxony "War mööt
wi hier smachten - Death by starving and euthanasia in the state hospital
and nursing home/mental institution Wehnen during the Third Reich"
c) Decision taking policy of the marine courts in Wilhelmshaven (1939 -
1945)
d) Living and working in the branch concentration camp Neuengamme of Wilhelmshaven
e) Criminal law proceedings of Oldenburg against foreigners under National
Socialism
f) Living conditions of foreigners as forced labour in the City of Oldenburg
during WW II
g) Activities of the main denazification committee for the region of Oldenburg
This praiseworthy act on the part of the mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard
Menzel does not release him from his responsibility in his own area of authority
and responsibility for the German administrative authority, here the immigration
office of the city of Wilhelmshaven and the German social authority, here
the child welfare office (Jugendamt) of the city of Wilhelmshaven, to take
appropriate action to counter the racist, discriminatory and possibly national
socialistic attitudes of his employees.
To fully assist Eberhard Menzel in this regard, hereby the official application
is submitted to the city of Wilhelmshaven and Mr. Eberhard Menzel to organise
a travelling exhibition state sponsored child abduction and alienation programs
alienation programs, to have it open at the city hall of the city of Wilhelmshaven.
To finance the official travelling exhibition, state sponsored child abduction
and alienation programs the city of Wilhelmshaven is requested to encourage
Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven to donate half of his
annual salary for a period of three years to the Wilhelmshaven Himmler child
abduction fund. This is based on the remark of Mr. Janssen of the immigration
office of Wilhelmshaven in that he clearly states, that the children abducted
to Germany should be automatically and logically "German", clearly proving
his affinity to the subject .
The following declarations of intent are to be correctly delivered to the
district court of Wilhelmshaven within the usual legal delay of two weeks
with a copy to be forwarded to the applicant and foreign left behind parent.
Declaration of intent of Mr. Menzel mayor of Wilhelmshaven
PLEASE DELETE WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE
1 a) The mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel hereby declares, that he
collaborates with Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven.
1 b) The mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel hereby officially declares,
that he does not collaborate with Mr. Janssen of the immigration office of
Wilhelmshaven, but that the mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel officially
declares, that he distances himself from Mr Janssen of the immigration office
of Wilhelmshaven. To officially and correctly distance himself from Mr Janssen
of the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven, the mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard
Menzel will institute legal measures against the responsible Mr Janssen of
the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven, so that Mr Janssen of the immigration
office of Wilhelmshaven can correctly assume responsibility for his documented
actions.
2a) The mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel hereby officially declares
that he agrees with the practice of officials of the Federal Republic of Germany
in the nationalsocialistic orientated treatment of people in particular in
regards to the aspect of child abduction and alienation programs.
2b) The mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel hereby officially declares
that he does not agree with the practice of officials of the Federal Republic
of Germany in the national socialistic orientated treatment of people in particular
in regards to the aspect of child abduction and alienation programs. To officially
document that he distances himself from national socialist body of thought
in the practice of officials of the Federal Republic of Germany, the mayor
of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel officially excuses himself and donates over
the next three years half of his annual salary to the Wilhelmshaven Himmler
child abduction fund, in addition he enters criminal charges in accordance
with the German criminal process regulations against himself at the responsible
authority.
Hereby the demand is made to correctly answer the demands already made on
the official letterhead of the city of Wilhelmshaven, together with the official
seal of the city of Wilhelmshaven.
The correct reporting back is necessary due to a number of reasons in connection
with the legal and political dispute at hand:
--- The clarification of the responsibility and accountability in International
legal procedures for reparation payments.
--- For the integration in political initiatives at the international level
among other things at the responsible United Nations commissions
Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
The document presented is to be entered to the official petitions PET 00447/08/15
PET 05816/11/14 as well as to open new petition procedures at the Parliament
of Lower Saxony as requested.
Dear Dr. Busch, Mrs. Bakker, Mr. Wessels, Mrs. Ballnus,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony,
The document presented is to be entered to the official complaint cycle
under the complaint numbers 4121 E -S4. 54/03 and 3700 E - 204.37/03 at the
Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony.
Dear Mr. Stoltenberg, human rights commissioner of
the Federal Republic of Germany at the Federal Ministry of Justice,
It is conclusively documented and proven that you in your function as human
rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany at the Federal Ministry
of Justice falsely informed the Human Rights Commission of the United Nations
in regards to cultural apartheid and racism executed by German authorities.
Uno will Studie über rassistische Taten in Deutschland
Der Rassismusausschuss der Uno-Menschenrechtskommission hat die Bundesregierung
aufgefordert, den markanten Anstieg rechtsextremistischer und fremdenfeindlicher
Straftaten in Deutschland zu untersuchen.
Genf - Eine Delegation der Bundesregierung hatte dem Ausschuss am Dienstag
berichtet, dass die Zahl im vergangenen Jahr um 58,9 Prozent auf 15.951 Straftaten
gestiegen war. Dabei handelt es sich um Hetzparolen im Internet, Schmierereien
an Hauswänden, aber auch 998 Gewaltdelikte. Die Ursachen dafür seien
noch nicht ergründet worden, sagte der Menschenrechtsbeauftragte aus
dem Bundesjustizministerium, Klaus Stoltenberg, in Genf.
Die Rassismus-Kommission untersucht Berichte über Fortschritte beim
Schutz der Menschenrechte, die die Uno-Mitgliedsländer in regelmäßigen
Abständen vorlegen. Die Entwicklung von Rassismus und Fremdenfeindlichkeit
bereite der Bundesregierung große Sorgen, sagte Stoltenberg. "Diese
abscheulichen Straftaten sind eine Schande für unser Land." Er verwies
auf das Bündnis für Toleranz, das das friedliche Zusammenleben aller
in Deutschland lebenden Gruppen fördern soll, und die Einrichtung des
Menschenrechtsinstituts in Berlin.
Der Ausschuss äußerte Befremden darüber, dass ethnischen
Minderheiten wie Sorben oder Sinti und Roma in Deutschland besondere Privilegien
eingeräumt werden, anderen Ausländergruppen aber nicht. Dies sei
historisch begründet, erläuterte die deutsche Delegation. Es könne
aber nicht jede Minderheit etwa auf Schulunterricht in ihrer Muttersprache
pochen. Sie versicherte, dass alle Ausländer in Deutschland das Recht
haben, ihre kulturelle Identität zu pflegen.
Den Vorwurf, Klagen über polizeiliche Übergriffe gegen Ausländer
würden nicht gründlich verfolgt, wies die deutsche Delegation zurück.
Es gebe in jedem Einzelfall straf- und disziplinarrechtliche Ermittlungsverfahren.
Die Polizisten würden für den Umgang mit Bürgern ausländischer
Herkunft besonders geschult, um Konflikte möglichst ohne Anwendung von
Gewalt zu schlichten.
14.03.2001, Der Spiegel
As documented the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany
engages in making false statements in international and human rights procedures
at international organisations and institutions by maintaining that German
authorities and their officials do not behave with hate for strangers and
national socialistic backgrounds against foreigners.
You are given the opportunity to officially and correctly respond within
the usual legal delay of two weeks.
In procedures in regard to child abduction to Germany and the boycott of
access that follows as documented and proven German judicial, social and administrative
authorities engage in behaviour and working methods that show hate towards
foreigners, against the foreign left behind environment to purposely influence
family court proceedings in regard to custody and access.
Thereby as documented intimidation, coercion and blackmail are engage into
to discriminate against and to disadvantage foreign left behind parents and
grandparents.
The following declarations of intent are to be correctly delivered to the
district court of Wilhelmshaven within the usual legal delay of two weeks
with a copy to be forwarded to the applicant and foreign left behind parent.
Declaration of intent of Mr. Stoltenberg the human
rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany
PLEASE DELEAT WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE
1 a) The human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany Mr
Stoltenberg hereby officially declares, that he collaborates with the administrative
office of the city of Wilhelmshaven and the competent and responsible mayor
Eberhard Menzel.
1 b) The human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany Mr
Stoltenberg at the Federal Justice Ministry hereby officially declares, that
he does not collaborate with the administrative office of the city of Wilhelmshaven
and the competent and responsible mayor Eberhard Menzel, but that The human
rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany Mr Stoltenberg officially
declares, that he distances himself from the administrative office of the
city of Wilhelmshaven and the responsible mayor Eberhard Menzel. To officially
and correctly distance himself from the administrative office the city of
Wilhelmshaven and the responsible mayor Eberhard Menzel it is to be correctly
and officially documented the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic
of Germany Mr Stoltenberg applies legal remedies against the responsible administrative
office of the city of Wilhelmshaven and the responsible mayor Eberhard Menzel,
so that those responsible at the administrative office of Wilhelmshaven and
the responsible mayor Eberhard Menzel can correctly assume responsibility
for their documented actions.
Hereby the demand is made to correctly answer the demands already made on
the official letterhead of the Justice Ministry of the Federal Republic of
Germany, together with the official seal of the Justice Ministry of the Federal
Republic of Germany.
The correct reporting back is necessary due to a number of reasons in connection
with the legal and political dispute at hand:
--- The clarification of the responsibility and accountability in International
legal procedures for reparation payments.
--- For the integration in political initiatives at the international level
among other things at the responsible United Nations commissions
Dear Mrs. Claudia Roth,
Federal Government Commissioner for Human Rights Policy and Humanitarian
Aid at the German Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs,
The Commissioner represents the Federal Government within the competencies
of the German federal ministry for foreign affairs abroad on matters concerning
human rights and humanitarian aid. Her duties include following developments
around the world in these fields, participating in bilateral and multilateral
dialogue with governments and non-governmental organisations and making practical
proposals to the Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs to help shape the human
rights policy of the Federal Government as well as keeping contact on the
inner state and international level with other authorities, institutions,
organisations, and social groups. The Commissioner's activities cover among
others fighting racism, xenophobia and intolerance as well as the protection
of minorities, refugees and human rights defenders as well as the whole spectrum
of the Federal Government's human rights policy with regard to foreign relations
and thereby concentrate on priority setting. She is thus particularly concerned
with improving the implementation of international standards, strengthening
the European dimension of human rights and emphasising the importance of human
rights policy as an interdisciplinary task.
The centre of activity of the appointed of the Federal Government at the
Federal Ministry of Justice Mr. Stoltenberg is to be described as follows:
He represents the Federal Republic of Germany before the European Court
of Human Rights as well as the on the human rights committee of the United
Nations. He is responsible for amendments and supplements to particular human
rights agreements of the United Nations as for the working of particular
protocols in regards to the (European convention for the protection of human
rights and basic freedoms - EHRC). The appointed person is a member of the
1993 Vienna conference of state and government heads of the European commission
against racism and intolerance. This anti-racism commission has the task of
investigating the legislation and measures to combat racism, xenophobia, anti
Semitism and the intolerance that comes therewith of the member states and
to make suggestions.
The handbook of human rights work of the Friedrich-Ebert-Trust and the Forum
of Human Rights.
As proved and documented the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic
of Germany Mr Stoltenberg engages in the cunning deception and the making
of deliberate false statements in international and human rights proceedings
at international organisations and institutions with the assertion that German
authorities and their officials would not get involved in cultural apartheid
and racism.
The human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany Mr Stoltenberg
at the Federal Ministry of Justice engages in deliberate misinformation and
the making of false statements, because as proven and documented German judicial,
social and administrative authorities in cases of international child abduction
to Germany and the boycott of access that follows apply racist behaviour and
working methods as well hate of strangers following the pattern of the nazi
steered child abduction and alienation programs.
Declaration of intent of Mrs. Roth the human rights
commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany at the Foreign Office
PLEASE DELEAT WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE
1a) The human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany in
the foreign Ministry, Mrs Roth hereby declares, that she collaborates with
Mr. Stoltenberg the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of
Germany at the justice Ministry, Mr. Stoltenberg.
1 b) The human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany in
the foreign Ministry, Mrs Roth hereby officially declares, that she does not
collaborate with the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of
Germany at the Federal Ministry of Justice Mr Stoltenberg, but that The human
rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany in the foreign Ministry,
Mrs Roth officially declares, that she officially distances herself from
the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany at the Federal
Ministry of Justice Mr Stoltenberg. To officially and correctly distance
herself the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany
at the Federal Ministry of Justice Mr Stoltenberg it is to be correctly and
officially documented that the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic
of Germany in the foreign Ministry, Mrs Roth institutes legal remedies against
the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany at the Federal
Ministry of Justice Mr Stoltenberg so that the human rights commissioner
of the Federal Republic of Germany at the Federal Ministry of Justice Mr
Stoltenberg so that he can assume the responsibility for his documented actions.
The human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany in the foreign
Ministry, Mrs Roth officially declares that typically German method of dealing
with crimes against humanity by "There is honour among thieves" and "Acquittal
for their own purposes" (Comp. The handling of crimes against humanity by
Nazi- Jurists) will not be tolerated.
Arising out of these grounds the human rights commissioner of the Federal
Republic of Germany in the foreign Ministry, Mrs Roth is to make recommendations
to the Foreign Ministry as well as to the Federal Government and the German
Federal Parliament to relieve the human rights commissioner of the Federal
Republic of Germany at the Federal Ministry of Justice Mr. Stoltenberg of
his office
Hereby the demand is made to correctly answer the demands already made on
the official letterhead of the foreign Ministry of the Federal Republic of
Germany, together with the official seal of the foreign Ministry Federal Republic
of Germany.
The correct reporting back is necessary due to a number of reasons in connection
with the legal and political dispute at hand:
--- The clarification of the responsibility and accountability in International
legal procedures for reparation payments.
--- For the integration in political initiatives at the international level
among other things at the responsible United Nations commissions
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn, chairwoman of the petitions
commission of the German Federal Parliament,
As proven and documented as the example from Wilhelmshaven, German judicial
social and administrative authorities involved in international child abduction
to Germany and the boycott of access that follows engage in racism and hate
of strangers in their behaviour and working methods. Whereas the human rights
commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany at the Federal Justice Ministry,
Klaus Stoltenberg officially states the opposite in international and human
rights issues.
Hereby the official petition to the German Federal Parliament handed
into the appropriate highest Federal Authority for examination, here the Federal
Ministry of Justice for the immediate release of Mr. Klaus Stoltenberg from
the office of human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany
at the Justice Ministry.
In light of the publications presented by the Federal Ministry of Justice
such as information brochures, behavioural guidelines and legal projects it
is to be checked in how far protection is offered to victims of child abduction,
boycott of access and alienation and will be improved in the future.
In the same way the initiatives of the Federal Justice Ministry for the
payment of reparations to the victims of child abduction are to be examined.
In the same way the initiatives of the Federal Justice Ministry for the
transparent historical working of the nazi steered child abduction and alienation
programs are to be examined.
Hereby the official application is made to integrate the online documentation
presented into the internet presence of the German Federal Parliament
Yours faithfully
Michael Hickman
Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur
on the situation of
Human Rights in Germany
to the United Nations and
to the European Institutions
|
Related Subject Matter:
|
|