Michael Hickman
Wilhelmshaven
Amtsgericht Wilhelmshaven
Marktstraße 15 – 17
26382 Wilhelmshaven
Beschwerdezyklen beim Justizministerium von Niedersachsen AKTENZEICHEN
4121 E -S4. 54/03 und AKTENZEICHEN 3700 E - 204.37/03
Dr. Busch, Frau Bakker, Herr Wessels, Frau Ballnus
Am Waterloo Platz 1
30169 Hannover
poststelle@mj.niedersachsen.de
Niedersächsischer Landtag
Pet 5816/11/14
Pet 00447/08/15
Hinrich-Wilhelm-Kopf-Platz 1
30159 Hannover
Postfach 4407
30044 Hannover
vockert@vockert.de,
klaus.krumfuss@t-online.de,
info@frauke-heiligenstadt.de
Frau Kuck, Frau Busch
The Hague Conference on Private International Law Mr. Hans van Loon, Secretary
General
Prof. William Duncan
Deputy Secretary General
Permanent Bureau of
The Hague Conference
on Private International Law
Scheveningseweg 6
2517 KT Den-Haag
The Netherlands
Wd@hcch.nl
Hvl@hcch.nl
secretariat@hcch.net
Mr Sibusiso Bengu
The South African Ambassador to Germany
South African Embassy
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin
botschaft@suedafrika.org
The South African President
Mr. T.M. Mbeki
Office of the President
Private Bag X1000
Pretoria 0001
Südafrika
President@po.gov.za
Claudia Roth, MdB
Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Menschenrechtspolitik
Federal Government Commissioner for Human Rights Policy and Humanitarian
Aid
Auswärtiges Amt
Werderscher Markt 1
11013 Berlin
claudia.roth@bundestag.de
claudia.roth@wk.bundestag.de
|
Marita Sehn
Anke Schwarzbäck
Petition Committee at the German Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss des deutschen Bundestages
Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
Fax: 030 227 30015
marita.sehn@bundestag.de
klaus.hagemann@bundestag.de
Wolfgang Thierse
President of the German federal parliament
Präsident des Deutschen Bundestages
Personal Referent
Persönlicher Referent
Wolfram Kolodziej-Derfert
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
wolfgang.thierse@bundestag.de
praesident@bundestag.de
Deutscher Richterbund
Vorsitzender Wolfgang Arenhövel
Kronenstr. 73/74
10117 Berlin
Wolfgang.Arenhoevel@lg-os.niedersachsen.de
frank.sta.freiburg@t-online.de
jan.grotheer@fg.justiz.hamburg.de
elmar.herrler@olg-n.bayern.de
brigitte.kamphausen@lg-duisburg.nrw.de
BettinaLeetz@web.de
August-Wilhelm.Marahrens@lg-h.niedersachsen.de
dwtapper@rz-online.de
HanspeterT@t-online.de
info@drb.de
Institut für Menschenrechte
Institute for human rights, Berlin
info@institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de
Commission on Human Rights
Support Services Branch
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
1503@ohchr.org
Herr Ralf Janßen
Ausländeramt
Stadt Wilhelmshaven
Rathaus platz 1
26382 Wilhelmshaven
Fax 04421 16411267
ralf.janssen@stadt.wilhelmshaven.de
Klaus Stoltenberg
Menschenrechtsbeauftragter der
Bundesrepublik Deutschland
human rights commissioner of the
Federal Republic of Germany
Bundesministerium der Justiz
Mohrenstraße 37
10117 Berlin
poststelle@bmj.bund.de
|
|
30. NOVEMBER 2003
a) FILE NUMBER 6 C 1411/03 district court of Wilhelmshaven
Racism and national socialist motives in German state-run child abduction
and alienation programs
b) criminal charges against the mayor of the city of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Eberhard
Menzel
due to coercion and blackmailing of foreign left-behind parents and victims
of international child abduction to Germany
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German
parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee at the German
federal parliament,
With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition proceedings
at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630 the herein documented
events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court
of Oldenburg are indicated as further proof for the establishing of an independent
enquête committee on the judiciary crimes against humanity by the practice
of German family law jurisdiction.
1) Why proceedings in child matters are refused, delayed, and manipulated,
e.g., at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court
of Oldenburg on child abduction and boycott of access, while expeditious proceedings
are presented to the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in the legal matter
of "alleged coloured hair" against the free press before the culminating
point of the election campaign 2002 ?
2) Why are there written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively invalid
for a certain population group due to sex, status, and nationality out of
political motivation?
3) Why in German family court proceedings in respect to international child
abduction to Germany and the boycott of access that follows, is intolerance
of foreigners, racism and discriminatory working methods to be observed, which
admit the conclusion of national socialistic thoughts and there resurrection?
Hereby the official request to integrate the accompanying online documentation
into the internet presence of the German Federal Parliament.Online documentation:http://www.michael-hickman.org
Case file number
6 C 1411/03 district court
Wilhelmshaven in the legal matter
Hickman versus the city of Wilhelmshaven
Dear Mr. Kahlen, director of the district court of
Wilhelmshaven
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
In the proceedings against Ulrich Greifelt and others of the UNITED STATES
MILITARY TRIBUNAL in Nuremberg from 10. October 1947 until 10. March 1948
leading SS-members from the group around Heinrich Himmler have been condemned
due to crimes against humanity among others on account of child abduction.
Criminal charges against the mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel due
to child trafficking
In accordance with the official guideline of the German federal ministry
of Justice (FILE NUMBER R B 3 - tu: 9311/22-2-23 335/2033 from 14 April 2003)
as well as in accordance with the criminal law procedure regulations criminal
charges against the mayor of Wilhelmshaven Eberhard Menzel are entered
directly at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the director of the
district court of Wilhelmshaven due to political persecution and deprivation
of liberty.
Reasoning and Facts
In the German history of international child abduction, the proceedings of
judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony already have
a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice
and due to certain traditional family law practice. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
The immigration authority of the city of Wilhelmshaven in the capacity of
German administrative authority under the competencies and responsibilities
of the major Eberhard Menzel has repeatedly intervened as documented with
aggressive methods and arbitrary measures according to various motives
--- Out of political motivation to cover and promote international child
abduction to Germany and the resulting boycott of access
--- Out of political motivation to discriminate and to disadvantage foreign
left behind parents and grandparents
In the case history of the present case the following behaviours of the immigration
office are documented:
1) Repeated attempts to deport the foreign left behind parent from Germany
during pending family court proceedings in regards to access to the children
abducted to Germany.
2) Repeated threats and coercion against the foreign left behind parent with
the explicit threat of the application of force to be used in deportation
as well as the explicit threat that following deportation a re-entry to Germany
would be permanently refused in order to prevent contact between the children
removed to Germany and the foreign left behind parent.
3) The refusal to allow re-entry to Germany in order to prevent that the
foreign left behind parent from answering the invitation of the European
Parliament to make presentation on the working methods of the German authorities
in regard to international child abduction and the boycott of access.
4) The targeted arbitrary measures to restrict mobility with the intention
of deprivation of liberty and of political persecution, so as to prevent,
that the foreign left behind parent is able to travel to Brussels, Belgium,
in order to inform the European Parliament about the working methods of the
German authorities in regard to international child abduction and boycott
of access. On one side, the foreign left behind parent, who has been resident
in Germany since July 2001 to apply for and implement access to children
removed to Germany via family court proceedings, has had absolutely no territorial
restrictions placed on his mobility so far. On the other hand, the immigration
office of the city of Wilhelmshaven as a German administrative authority
has now after the official invitation of the European Parliament to the foreign
left behind parent, has informed that the foreign left behind parent is not
allowed at all to leave the German Land of Lower Saxony.
The Children Welfare Office (Jugendamt) of the city of Wilhelmshaven in the
capacity of German social authority under the competencies and responsibilities
of the mayor Eberhard Menzel has repeatedly intervened as documented with
aggressive methods and arbitrary measures according to various motives :
1) 20.08.2002 file number 10-10:Blackmail, coercion and threat by Hans-Dieter
Siehl of the supervision authority in charge of the child welfare (Jugendamt)
at the city of Wilhelmshaven against the applicant and children’s father
in response the official complaint against employees of the child welfare
office (Jugendamt), while at the same time the child welfare office (Jugendamt)
of the city of Wilhelmshaven together with the district court deliberately
does not enforce the court ordered access for a period of one year.
2) 04.09.2002 case file number 16 F 605/00 UG: Court hearing after a deliberate
delay of a period of one year and the deliberate non-enforcement of the court
ordered access: The acting head of the child welfare office (Jugendamt) of
Wilhelmshaven Dieter Viering recommends the exclusion of access to the children
abducted to Germany for a period of two years out of revenge and retaliation
for the making public of the incorrect working methods of the child welfare
office (Jugendamt) of Wilhelmshaven in the ARTE TV documentary (Theme evening.
War over children) in which the director of the Children Welfare Office (Jugendamt)
of Wilhelmshaven Klaus Jürjens admits wrongdoing of the Children Welfare
Office, that was broadcast on the day before the hearing on the 03.09.2002.
These working methods of German administrative and social authorities are
unworthy in a democratic society in particular in a German democratic, constitutional
society, one that in it’s constitution officially states that, it serves
the principle of freedom in the world within a unified Europe.
The documented deliberate violation of the inner state and international
rights as well as the deliberate disrespect of international law conventions
by the immigration office of Wilhelmshaven as a German administrative authority
and of the Children's Welfare Office of Wilhelmshaven as a German social
authority under the competencies and responsibilities of the mayor Eberhard
Menzel present a legitimate need for legal protection.
Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
The document presented is to be entered to the official petitions PET 00447/08/15
PET 05816/11/14 as well as to open new petition procedures at the Parliament
of Lower Saxony as requested.
Dear Dr. Busch, Mrs. Bakker, Mr. Wessels, Mrs. Ballnus,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony,
The document presented is to be entered to the official complaint cycle
under the complaint numbers 4121 E -S4. 54/03 and 3700 E - 204.37/03 at the
Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony.
Yours faithfully
Michael Hickman
Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur
on the situation of
Human Rights in Germany
to the United Nations and
to the European Institutions
|
Related Subject Matter:
|
|