CRY-Aktionskreis Internationale
Kinderrechte
Michael Hickman
Wilhelmshaven
Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg
Postfach 2451
26014 Oldenburg
Poststelle@olg-ol.niedersachsen.de
Fax: 0441 220 1155
Beschwerdezyklen beim Justizministerium von Niedersachsen AKTENZEICHEN
4121 E -S4. 54/03 und AKTENZEICHEN 3700 E - 204.37/03
Dr. Busch, Frau Bakker, Herr Wessels, Frau Ballnus
Am Waterloo Platz 1
30169 Hannover
poststelle@mj.niedersachsen.de
Niedersächsischer Landtag
Pet 5816/11/14
Pet 00447/08/15
Hinrich-Wilhelm-Kopf-Platz 1
30159 Hannover
Postfach 4407
30044 Hannover
vockert@vockert.de,
klaus.krumfuss@t-online.de,
info@frauke-heiligenstadt.de
Frau Kuck, Frau Busch
The Hague Conference on Private International Law Mr. Hans van Loon,
Secretary General
Prof. William Duncan
Deputy Secretary General
Permanent Bureau of
The Hague Conference
on Private International Law
Scheveningseweg 6
2517 KT Den-Haag
The Netherlands
Wd@hcch.nl
Hvl@hcch.nl
secretariat@hcch.net
Mr Sibusiso Bengu
The South African Ambassador to Germany
South African Embassy
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin
botschaft@suedafrika.org
The South African President
Mr. T.M. Mbeki
Office of the President
Private Bag X1000
Pretoria 0001
Südafrika
President@po.gov.za
|
Marita Sehn
Anke Schwarzbäck
Petition Committee at the German Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss des deutschen Bundestages
Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
Fax: 030 227 30015
marita.sehn@bundestag.de
klaus.hagemann@bundestag.de
Wolfgang Thierse
President of the German federal parliament
Präsident des Deutschen Bundestages
Personal Referent
Persönlicher Referent
Wolfram Kolodziej-Derfert
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
wolfgang.thierse@bundestag.de
praesident@bundestag.de
Deutscher Richterbund
Vorsitzender Wolfgang Arenhövel
Kronenstr. 73/74
10117 Berlin
Wolfgang.Arenhoevel@lg-os.niedersachsen.de
frank.sta.freiburg@t-online.de
jan.grotheer@fg.justiz.hamburg.de
elmar.herrler@olg-n.bayern.de
brigitte.kamphausen@lg-duisburg.nrw.de
BettinaLeetz@web.de
August-Wilhelm.Marahrens@lg-h.niedersachsen.de
dwtapper@rz-online.de
HanspeterT@t-online.de
info@drb.de
Institut für Menschenrechte
Institute for human rights, Berlin
info@institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de
Commission on Human Rights
Support Services Branch
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
1503@ohchr.org
Herr Ralf Janßen
Ausländeramt
Stadt Wilhelmshaven
Rathaus platz 1
26382 Wilhelmshaven
Fax 04421 16411267
ralf.janssen@stadt.wilhelmshaven.de
|
30 November 2003
14 WF 266/03
Rejection of the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt from the higher
regional court of Oldenburg due to bias, deception in legal proceedings and
falsifying of court documents based on national socialism body of thought.
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German
parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee at the German
federal parliament,
With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition proceedings
at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630 the herein documented
events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court
of Oldenburg are indicated as further proof for the establishing of an independent
enquête committee on the judiciary crimes against humanity by the practice
of German family law jurisdiction.
1) Why proceedings in child matters are refused, delayed, and manipulated,
e.g., at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court
of Oldenburg on child abduction and boycott of access, while expeditious proceedings
are presented to the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in the legal matter
of "alleged coloured hair" against the free press before the culminating
point of the election campaign 2002 ?
2) Why are there written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively invalid
for a certain population group due to sex, status, and nationality out of
political motivation?
3) Why in German family court proceedings in respect to international child
abduction to Germany and the boycott of access that follows, is intolerance
of foreigners, racism and discriminatory working methods to be observed, which
admit the conclusion of national socialistic thoughts and there re-activation?
FILE NUMBER
14 WF 266/03
higher regional court
of Oldenburg
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs from the higher regional court
of Oldenburg,
Hereby the legal demand is made to reject the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider,
Gebhardt on the grounds of bias in the legal matter Case file number 14 WF
266/03.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the Judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt prove their uncivilised, anti-democratic wrongful acting
under misuse of authority and under breach of official duty during control
and monitoring proceedings on three levels:
--- German jurist caste spirit
--- Legalising of child abduction boycott of access and alienation
--- Obsolete definition of gender roles
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt go so far in the realisation of their political goal setting,
that the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg deliberately lie, make false statements in the drafting of their
decision by means of burking of documents and deception in legal proceedings
to falsify court documents in the case of international child abduction and
boycott of access.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that the procedural pattern
of the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt leads back on all three
level to national socialistic school of thought, which will be shown in the
following reasoning.
Reasoning and facts
It follows the reasoning of the documented behavioural pattern of the judges
Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
on the previously named three operating levels.
German jurist caste spirit
On the first level the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt engage as
documented at the higher regional court of Oldenburg in the tactic of the
nazi jurists of avoiding taking responsibility for historical incorrect behaviour.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents with the working methods
of the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt structural similarities with
the working methods and behavioural patterns of the nazi jurists.
In addition to intentional violation of human rights and international law
on one side formal requirements, guidelines and laws are deliberately disregarded
When on the other side, resistance against the injustice of German judicial
authorities is formed and articulated, to therewith complain about violations
against humanity, formalities are brought into the defensive position by the
German judicial authorities to build a wall of silence as a barricade around
the unjust acts.
Simultaneously their own crimes against humanity as well as the crimes against
humanity against by their German judge colleagues should be justified and
presented as being as "legal" as possible so that self acquittal can follow.
This strategy is particularly evident in the example of the typical argumentation
used in the attempted justification, that deliberately avoids to touch on
the content level but withdraws with calculated distance persisted on the
administrative level.
In this way the higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the judges
Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
while quoting of the civil process regulations with the goal of rejecting
the charge of bias against the German judge colleagues Bartels, Schubert,
Kuhlmann of the higher court of Oldenburg, the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider,
Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg deliberately do not quote
the paragraphs of the civil process regulations that say that in child matters,
here international child abduction and the boycott of access, are to be deliberately
delayed and court ordered access is to be deliberately not enforced.
The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg deliberately avoid answering the official questions on the content
level.
With the decision to not analyse and to not evaluate the background and
documented incorrect working methods, the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider,
Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg deliberately do not provide
the legal protection before the judges in a democratic society.
At the same time the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher
regional court of Oldenburg prefer to protect their for German judge colleagues
who have been accused of wrong doing in the sense and tradition of the German
caste spirit and in the unacceptable extension of the working methods of the
nazi jurists.
The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt document thereby that they misuse
their office in the orientation of the state against the citizens in a democratic
society.
In their self confidence, in their activities and in their decision taking
practice, the judges Wachendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg practice the Nazi credo of "There is honour among thieves"
and "Acquittal for their own purposes" in opposition to highest jurisdiction
that requires accelerated proceedings in children’s matters.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the focus of the legal
political acts of the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt is orientated
to protect the reputation of their German judge colleagues who without doubt
engage in incorrect working methods.
Legalising of Child abduction boycott of access and alienation
On the second level the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt engage as
documented at the higher regional court of Oldenburg in furtherance of the
nazi ideology of state sponsored child abduction program with cultural discrimination
in German family jurisprudence.
In the German history of deliberate aggressive and anti-human violations
of international law, the Nazis intentionally apply state organised child
abduction and alienation in order to implement their national socialist demographic
and racial political goals.
Thereby children abducted into the Third Reich are subjected to alienation
and programming in order to speed up the wanted process of Germanisation.
Socio-political factors as backgrounds are among others that the implementation
of state political aims (e.g. war of aggression and conquering, extension
of the available soil for the people with simultaneous demand for domination
by the master race) is opposed by an insufficient birth rate and that the
elevation of the own race as the superior declared race demands the oppression
and eradication of foreign race characteristics.
In the first quarter of the 20th century, the Nazis conducted a state run
child abduction and alienation program as part of their Germanisation plan.
As a result of the Nuremberg Trials, and after nearly two years of study,
the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted on 9th December, 1948,
a Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In
this Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent
to destroy, in whole or in part, a national ethnical, racial or religious
group, as such : [...] forcibly transferring children of the group to another
group. Those who cannot learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that the focus of the
legal political way of working of the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt
under the moral and political responsibility of the president of the higher
regional court Mr Kramer, has the effect of implementing and legalising basic
structural elements of the nazi child abduction program with alienation and
Germanisation in the practice of German jurisprudence.
--- Child abduction
--- Alienation
--- Racism
--- Germanisation
--- Manipulation of files
In the proceedings against Ulrich Greifelt and others of the UNITED STATES
MILITARY TRIBUNAL in Nuremberg from 10. October 1947 until 10. March 1948
leading SS-members from the group around Heinrich Himmler have been condemned
due to crimes against humanity among others on account of child abduction.
To a given point of time it will have to be verified with further legal
remedies available, in how far negative sanctions among others have to be
applied on the national and on the international level in regard to relevant
criminal prosecution against the re-activation of national socialism body
of thought as well as against the propagation of propaganda material of organisations
violating the German constitution for the protection of democracy, constitutionality
and human rights.
Obsolete definition of the gender roles
On the third level, the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt from the
higher regional court of Oldenburg engage as documented with advantaging conversely
disadvantaging on the grounds of biological sex.
In the documented acts of the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt from
the higher regional court of Oldenburg the socio-political conception of the
judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt is clearly based on an obsolete role
expectations and definition of gender relations.
In this concept it is generally intentionally refused on the basis of the
biological sex to allow the father a role in the bringing up of the children.
The father is in his efforts to take on the parental responsibility deliberately
disadvantaged, discriminated, and excluded.
At the same time the behavioural pattern of the children’s mother in the
social reality, which is characterised by the facts of international child
abduction and boycott of access, is intentionally not made a theme.
Hereby the principal aim of the concept is followed, that the children’s
mother on the grounds of her biological sex is attributed with all so-called
typical female characteristics, the area of responsibility of the private
inner sphere, and the victim status.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg intentionally
propagate the dual opposition of the sexes in order to apply their political
aims which encompass to prevent equality between the sexes and a balance of
the gender relations.
Out of these grounds the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt deliberately
do not take seriously the official description of the experience of violence
and the experience of injustice by the applicant and foreign left behind father.
The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt follow the strategy of not respecting
the making visible in public of the violence, so as to make "what shall not
be, can not be" to prevent the children’s father from participating in the
private sphere and in education and upbringing.
The discrediting and defamation of the victim is a hallmark of political
justice, which is a repetitive pattern in history.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that the focus of the
legal political acts of the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt are to
have the effect to continue the national socialistic world view in family
politics and in the politics of demography, that dictate that human material
of the male gender is there whole and alone to serve the state as soldier
and worker, but is not allowed to have so-called typical female characteristics.
The area of responsibility in the private sphere and in the bringing up of
the children is to be reserved for the biologically determined reproduction
machines, i.e. the human material of the female sex.
Compare also in this respect:
At this point "the Fuehrer (Adolf Hitler) placed emphasis with all resoluteness
on the point that not the concern about the Well-being of the Child would
be the decisive factor in the front rank but the mother's ethical right of
the child"
The family and inheritance law under National Socialism.
The statement of Hitler is documented in the writing of Lammers to be found
in the files of
'Reichskanzlei Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde, R 43 II 424 a und b bzw.
des Justizministeriums unter R 22/ 484 befindet. - Schubert; 703, 704, 1993
--- Fuehrer head quarters 29 January 1944. Note. Concerning: the securing
of the future of the German nation. Martin Bormann, the secretary of the Fuehrer
Adolf Hitler
Lies, Desinformation, deception in legal proceedings by the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt go so far in the realisation of their political goal setting,
that the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg deliberately lie, make false statements in the drafting of their
decision by means of burking of documents and deception in legal proceedings
to falsify court documents so as to as explained further their national socialistic
school of thought on multiple levels.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt to realise their political goal and to justify their politically
predetermined decisions they deliberately on numerous occasions burk documents
to enable the falsifying of documents here their court decision of the 18
November 2003 under the case file number 14 WF 266/03.
The German judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg maintain under false statement, call upon a court decision
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven of the 22.11.03 16 F 605/00, that essentially
barred access of the left behind foreign father to his children abducted
to Germany.
The actual decision of the district court of Wilhelmshaven after one year
of deliberate undue delay of proceedings and after one year of deliberate
non-enforcement of court ordered access is only to be seen as a strategic
moment in the present case history of international child abduction to Germany
and resulting boycott of access in order to cover as documented and proven
the incorrect proceedings - deliberate undue delay of proceedings and deliberate
non-enforcement of court ordered access over the period of one year - by the
district court of Wilhelmshaven.
The decisions of the German family judge Staubwasser of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven case number 16 F 605/00 confine themselves as in the analysis
of the content to defamation and discrimination of the applicant , the foreign
left behind parent, due to process strategic grounds.
In addition, the applicant and foreign left behind parent has been
coerced threatened and blackmailed as a result of his making public of his
experiences of violence and being a victim as well as on the grounds of his
open criticism of the working methods of the German authorities in regards
to child abduction and boycott of access.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt technique of burking of documents, and the deliberate
rejection of proof material to protect their judge colleagues Bartels, Schubert
and Kuhlmann.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents, that the responsible
judges deliberately burked the court document of the 15.08.2001 in the proceeding
case number 16 F 605/00, that ordered access, access that was not enforced
which together with the process were delayed for a period of one year.
The judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
deliberately cover these incorrect working methods and are in turn covered
in their incorrect working methods by their German judge colleagues Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
The Federal Government under the responsibility of the Federal Chancellor
Gerhard Schroeder maintains that the judges of the higher regional court are
specially trained in child abduction and boycott of access, they work correctly
and they process are dealt with expeditiously
In the case, file number 14 WF 266/03 the German judges Wachtendorf, Schneider,
Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg enter into deception in
legal proceedings and falsifying of court documents in international child
abduction to Germany and resulting boycott of access.
The German judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg maintain under false statement, call upon a court decision
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven of the 22.11.03 16 F 605/00, that essentially
barred access of the left behind foreign father to his children abducted
to Germany.
This decision is not existent, the higher regional court documents therewith,
that the German judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg deliberately lie in cases in respect to child abduction
and boycott of access.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents likewise that the German
judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
deliberately burk documents and so commit deception in legal proceedings in
cases regarding child abduction and boycott of access.
The German judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt deliberately burk the
decision of the district court of Wilhelmshaven of the 15.08.2001 in the case
16 F 605/00, that ordered access to the children abducted to Germany, while
this court ordered access has been to date deliberately not been enforced
by the district court of Wilhelmshaven and by the higher regional court of
Oldenburg.
In the decision 14 UF 126/03 the higher regional court of Oldenburg, the
judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann deliberately ignore the application to
reject them on the grounds of bias. The higher regional court of Oldenburg
refuses the grievance procedures against the district court of Wilhelmshaven
by using the trick of the back door by calling on formalities here the civil
procedural regulations, while the Higher regional court of Oldenburg with
the German judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann at this time point on one hand
considering all procedural considerations they legalised the irregularities
and mistakes of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, on the other hand the
German judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann by quoting the civil procedural
procedures they violated the civil procedural regulations, because the German
judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann deliberately reject the charge of bias
thereby ignoring the civil procedural regulations by making their decision.
The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg deliberately cover these incorrect working methods of their German
Judge colleagues Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt, lie and make false statements, they maintain that there
are no objective grounds to reject their judge colleagues Bartels, Schubert,
Kuhlmann on the grounds of the apprehension of bias.
The objective fact is that the legalisation strategy of the judges Bartels,
Schubert, Kuhlmann of the higher regional court of Oldenburg, the deliberate
delay of procedures in children’s matters in regards to access and the deliberate
refusal to enforce court ordered access following international child abduction
to Germany over the time period of one year definitely and explicitly has
the structural similarity of the nazi propagated child abduction and alienation
and Germanisation program.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg documents that the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt deliberately engage in desinformation and deception in
legal proceedings in the realisation of their political objectives as well
as to cover their German judge colleagues.
Declaration of intent of the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of
the higher regional court of Oldenburg
PLEASE DELETE WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE
Hereby the official application is made for your official statement and
your declaration of intent within the usual legal delay of two weeks within
the frame work of a democratic society.
Your separate statement and declaration of intent are needed to be correctly
announced with the stamp of the higher regional court of Oldenburg which will
be used for further political and judicial procedures on the national as
well as on the international level.
1 a) The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg hereby officially declare, that they collaborate with
the German family judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann of the higher district
court of Oldenburg, in particular with the incorrect working methods of the
judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann in regards to international child abduction
and boycott of access.
1 b) The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg hereby officially declare, that they do not collaborate
with the German family judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann of the higher district
court of Oldenburg, but that they distance themselves from the responsible
German judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann of the higher district court of
Oldenburg. To officially and correctly distance themselves from these family
judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann of the higher district court of Oldenburg,
the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of
Oldenburg will enter legal remedies against these responsible German family
judges of the higher regional court of Oldenburg, so that these family judges
can correctly take on the responsibility for their incorrect acts in international
child abduction, boycott of access and alienation.
2 a) The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg hereby officially declare, that they collaborate with
the convicted SS-Fuehrern out of group of Heinrich Himmler that were found
guilty of crimes against humanity by Nuremberg Tribunal for child abduction,
boycott of access alienation and forced Germanisation.
2b) The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg hereby officially declare, that they distance themselves from
the nazi regime and national socialistic school of thought. To correctly and
officially document their distancing from the national socialistic school
of thought in the legal practice and in the legal reality of the Federal Republic
of Germany, the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg will institute legal measures against Heinrich Himmler
on the grounds of crimes against humanity in particular on the grounds of
child abduction, alienation and Germanisation. In addition the judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg are to institute
legal measures against all still living judges who served the nazi regime.
On the grounds of their particular understanding of democracy and the constitutional
state principle the judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt will also institute
legal remedies against all judges of the Federal Republic of Germany that
acquitted the judges of the nazi regime.
Legal demands to the higher regional court of Oldenburg
The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt are to be rejected correctly
in accordance with the constitution. The applications to reject the judges
Wachtendorf, Schubert, Kuhlmann as well as those to reject the judges Bartels,
Schubert and Kuhlmann are to be correctly processed by other independent German
judges of another senate, to restore the ability of the senate to make a
fair judgement in the main proceedings
The judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt are to be correctly suspended
from office in connection with national socialist activities until the activities
of these judges and their further political activities are fully and transparently
clarified.
Hereby the official demand is entered at the higher regional court of Oldenburg
for the closure of international airports and European borders by entry in
the INPOL-/SIS-System at the German frontier police (GSD) Koblenz to prevent
the escape of the German judges Wachtendorf, Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher
regional court of Oldenburg responsible persons for German Crimes against
Humanity committed due to their the national socialistic school of thought.
The higher regional court of Oldenburg has to correctly in accordance with
the official statements make sure that the judges are specifically trained
to process the case at hand.
In this regard the higher regional court of Oldenburg has to give proof
of attendance at and the content and of the advanced specialised training
of the judges concerned and to correctly and well substantiated in detail
to name the content of such training.
This goes for both the judges who have already been involved as well as
for the still to be named judges of the higher regional court of Oldenburg.
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg
You have on many levels an historical responsibility. In regards to this
historical responsibility you have the secured independence granted you by
the constitution to take on the responsibility if you so choose.
As a German judge you have a historical responsibility in particular because
German judges intentionally under the German constitution promoted Adolf Hitler,
national socialism and the second world war.
Der anschließende Hochverratsprozeß gegen Hitler, Ludendorff
und andere geriet zu einer Farce. Die Angeklagten durften Propagandareden
gegen die Republik und ihre Politiker halten; der Ankläger agierte eher
als Verteidiger. Am 1. April 1924 wurde Ludendorff freigesprochen, Hitler
erhielt fünf Jahre Festungshaft mit der Aussicht auf Begnadigung nach
sechs Monaten, die übrigen Angeklagten kamen mit noch geringeren Strafen
davon. Das Gericht lehnte es ausdrücklich ab, den NSDAP-Führer gemäß
den Bestimmungen des Republikschutzgesetzes als wegen Hochverrats verurteilten
Ausländer nach Österreich abzuschieben: Bei einem Mann, "der so
deutsch denkt und fühlt wie Hitler" und der sich durch "rein vaterländischen
Geist und edelsten Willen" auszeichne, komme diese Maßnahme nicht in
Frage.
Kampf um die Republik 1919-1923, Informationen zur politischen Bildung (Heft
261), Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung - Reinhard Sturm
As president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg you are morally and
politically responsible for the legal political leitkultur at the higher regional
court of Oldenburg
In the context of the local legal political leitkultur of Oldenburg it is
to mention that it is documented that the de-nazification for the region of
Oldenburg that apart form other things on the 22.02.1949 the carrier of the
nazi jurist Dr. Bode who participated in the judicial murder of Gdansk to
put down the resistance against the overtaking of Poland and the outbreak
of the 2 world war was promoted by the Federal Republic of Germany.
"The self-acquittal of the Judiciary is an incident with many participants,
which links the history of the federal republic to the history of the Third
Reich."
(The Post of Gdansk)
As a responsible German you are therefore responsible to speak out in a
democratic Germany against national socialist school of thought and it’s
resurrection.
Hereby the official request for your official statement and declaration
of intent within the usual legal delay of two weeks in the frame of your
independence in a democratic society.
Your official statement and declaration of intent is needed to be correctly
announced with the official stamp of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
which will be used for further political and judicial proceedings at the national
and the international level.
Declaration of intent of Mr. Kramer president of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg
PLEASE DELETE WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE
1 a) Mr. Kramer president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg
hereby declares, that he collaborates with the German family judges of the
higher regional court of Oldenburg, in particular with the incorrect working
methods of the judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann, Wachtendorf; Schneider
Gebhardt in regards to international child abduction and the boycott of access.
1 b) Mr. Kramer president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg hereby
officially declares, that he does not collaborate with the German family judges
of the higher regional court of Oldenburg, but that he distances himself from
the responsible family judges of the higher regional court of Oldenburg. To
officially and correctly document that he distances from the judges of the
higher regional court of Oldenburg, Mr Kramer president of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg will institute legal measures against the responsible German
family judges of the higher regional court of Oldenburg, so that these family
judges can correctly assume the responsibility for their documented incorrect
acts in respect to international child abduction, boycott of access and alienation.
2a) Mr. Kramer president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg hereby
officially declares, that he collaborate with the convicted SS-Fuehrern out
of group of Heinrich Himmler that were found guilty of crimes against humanity
by Nuremberg Tribunal for child abduction, boycott of access alienation and
forced Germanisation.
2b) Mr. Kramer president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg hereby
officially declares, that he distances himself from the nazi regime and national
socialistic school of thought. To correctly and officially document his distancing
from the national socialistic school of thought in the legal practice and
in the legal reality of the Federal Republic of Germany, Mr Kramer president
of the higher regional court of Oldenburg is to institute legal measures against
all still living judges who served the nazi regime. On the grounds of his
particular understanding of democracy and the constitutional state principle
Mr Kramer the president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg will also
institute legal remedies against all judges of the Federal Republic of Germany
that acquitted the judges of the nazi regime.
3a) Mr. Kramer president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg hereby
officially declares, that he uses his historical responsibility that Mr Kramer
in his position of president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg holds
collaborates with the German judges who under the German constitution intentionally
promoted Adolf Hitler, national socialism and the second world war.
3b) Mr. Kramer president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg hereby
officially declares, that he uses his historical responsibility that Mr Kramer
in his position of president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg holds
and does not collaborates with the German judges who under the German constitution
intentionally promoted Adolf Hitler, national socialism and the second world
war. To officially and to correctly document that he distances himself from
the German judges that promoted Adolf Hitler, national socialism and the second
world war Mr Kramer president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg will
institute legal remedies against the responsible German judges and Adolf Hitler,
so that they may correctly assume the responsibility for their unjust acts
and for their crimes against humanity. Mr Kramer president of the higher regional
court of Oldenburg so by engages in the praiseworthy act with civil courage
that has been encouraged by the former Justice Minister of Lower Saxony Christian
Pfeiffer. Not only that Mr Kramer president of the higher regional court
of Oldenburg to show that he supports the annulment of the nazi unjust judgements
as well as the reparations of the victims of the nazi injustice and judicial
terror, Mr Kramer president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg is
to speak out for the historical reconciliation and for the civil and criminal
prosecution of the nazi criminals.
Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Hereby the official application to discharge the German judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg from office
on the grounds given. The document presented is to be entered to the official
petitions PET 00447/08/15
PET 05816/11/14 as well as to open new petition procedures at the Parliament
of Lower Saxony as requested.
Dear Dr. Busch, Mrs. Bakker, Mr. Wessels, Mrs. Ballnus,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony,
Hereby the official application to bring about disciplinary procedures and
disciplinary measures to discharge from office the German judges Wachtendorf,
Schneider, Gebhardt of the higher regional court of Oldenburg on the grounds
given.
The document presented is to be entered to the official complaint cycle
under the complaint numbers 4121 E -S4. 54/03 and 3700 E - 204.37/03 at the
Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony.
Yours faithfully
Michael Hickman.
Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur on the situation of Human
Rights in Germany to the United Nations and to the European Institutions
|
|
|