Michael Hickman
Wilhelmshaven
Amtsgericht Wilhelmshaven
Marktstraße 15 – 17
26382 Wilhelmshaven
Beschwerdezyklen beim Justizministerium von Niedersachsen AKTENZEICHEN 4121
E -S4. 54/03 und AKTENZEICHEN 3700 E - 204.37/03
Dr. Busch, Frau Bakker, Herr Wessels, Frau Ballnus
Am Waterloo Platz 1
30169 Hannover
poststelle@mj.niedersachsen.de
Fax 0511 120 5170
Niedersächsischer Landtag
Pet 5816/11/14
Pet 00447/08/15
Hinrich-Wilhelm-Kopf-Platz 1
30159 Hannover
Postfach 4407
30044 Hannover
vockert@vockert.de,
klaus.krumfuss@t-online.de,
info@frauke-heiligenstadt.de
Frau Kuck, Frau Busch
Frau Lütjering
Fax 0511 3030 2806
The Hague Conference on Private International Law
Mr. Hans van Loon, Secretary General
Prof. William Duncan
Deputy Secretary General
Permanent Bureau of
The Hague Conference
on Private International Law
Scheveningseweg 6
2517 KT Den-Haag
The Netherlands
Wd@hcch.nl
Hvl@hcch.nl
secretariat@hcch.net
Mr Sibusiso Bengu
The South African Ambassador to Germany
South African Embassy
Friedrichstrasse 60
10117 Berlin
botschaft@suedafrika.org
The South African President
Mr. T.M. Mbeki
Office of the President
Private Bag X1000
Pretoria 0001
Südafrika
President@po.gov.za
Claudia Roth, MdB
Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Menschenrechtspolitik
Federal Government Commissioner for Human Rights Policy and Humanitarian
Aid
Auswärtiges Amt
Werderscher Markt 1
11013 Berlin
claudia.roth@bundestag.de
claudia.roth@wk.bundestag.de
|
Marita Sehn
Anke Schwarzbäck
Petition Committee at the German Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss des deutschen Bundestages
Pet 4-14-07-301-050630
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
Fax: 030 227 30015
marita.sehn@bundestag.de
klaus.hagemann@bundestag.de
Wolfgang Thierse
President of the German federal parliament
Präsident des Deutschen Bundestages
Personal Referent
Persönlicher Referent
Wolfram Kolodziej-Derfert
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
wolfgang.thierse@bundestag.de
praesident@bundestag.de
Deutscher Richterbund
Vorsitzender Wolfgang Arenhövel
Kronenstr. 73/74
10117 Berlin
Wolfgang.Arenhoevel@lg-os.niedersachsen.de
frank.sta.freiburg@t-online.de
jan.grotheer@fg.justiz.hamburg.de
elmar.herrler@olg-n.bayern.de
brigitte.kamphausen@lg-duisburg.nrw.de
BettinaLeetz@web.de
August-Wilhelm.Marahrens@lg-h.niedersachsen.de
dwtapper@rz-online.de
HanspeterT@t-online.de
info@drb.de
Institut für Menschenrechte
Institute for human rights, Berlin
info@institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de
Commission on Human Rights
Support Services Branch
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
1503@ohchr.org
Herr Ralf Janßen
Ausländeramt
Stadt Wilhelmshaven
Rathaus platz 1
26382 Wilhelmshaven
Fax 04421 16411267
ralf.janssen@stadt.wilhelmshaven.de
Klaus Stoltenberg
Menschenrechtsbeauftragter der
Bundesrepublik Deutschland
human rights commissioner of the
Federal Republic of Germany
Bundesministerium der Justiz
Mohrenstraße 37
10117 Berlin
poststelle@bmj.bund.de
|
04. DECEMBER 2003
a) FILE NUMBER 6 C 1411/03 district court of Wilhelmshaven
Racism and national socialist motives in German state-run child abduction
and alienation programs
b) Complaint to the supervision authority against the German judge Huelsebusch
and the legal demand to refrain from insult, threat and coercion against
the applicant because the applicant speaks out against the resurrection of
the national socialist school of thought
c) criminal charges against the Nazi Heinrich Himmler due to child abduction
and Crimes against Humanity
d) Petition to the German federal parliament for verification of the German
federal ministry of justice and immediate dismissal from office of Klaus
Stoltenberg, human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany
at the German federal ministry of justice
Dear Mr. Wolfgang Thierse, president of the German parliament,
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn chairwoman of the petition committee at the German
federal parliament,
With the authorisation of the petitioner of the present petition proceedings
at the German Federal Parliament Pet 4-14-07-301-050630 the herein documented
events at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional
court of Oldenburg are indicated as further proof for the establishing of
an independent enquête committee on the judiciary crimes against humanity
by the practice of German family law jurisdiction.
1) Why proceedings in child matters are refused, delayed, and manipulated,
e.g., at the district court of Wilhelmshaven and at the higher regional court
of Oldenburg on child abduction and boycott of access, while expeditious
proceedings are presented to the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in the
legal matter of "alleged coloured hair" against the free press before the
culminating point of the election campaign 2002 ?
2) Why are there written laws in Germany, which are valid respectively invalid
for a certain population group due to sex, status, and nationality out of
political motivation?
3) Why in German family court proceedings in respect to international child
abduction to Germany and the boycott of access that follows, is intolerance
of foreigners, racism and discriminatory working methods to be observed,
which admit the conclusion of national socialistic thoughts and there resurrection?
Hereby the official request to integrate the accompanying online documentation
into the internet presence of the German Federal Parliament.
Online documentation:
http://www.michael-hickman.org
Case file number
6 C 1411/03 (I) district court
Wilhelmshaven in the legal matter Hickman versus the city of Wilhelmshaven
On the 26.11.2003 in the case presented the district court of Wilhelmshaven
documents, that the German judge Huelsebusch makes the statement with
the following procedural patterns:
The German judge Huelsebusch insults and slanders the applicant and children’s
father with the statement, that the applicant and children’s father "has
evidently lost all reasonable standards for the guidance of human acting"
While the German judge Huelsebusch deliberately covers the incorrect working
methods of the district court of Wilhelmshaven with deliberate delay of proceedings
for a year and the deliberate non-enforcement of court ordered access for
two years.
The German judge Huelsebusch places the applicant and children’s father under
the criminal offence, that the applicant and children’s father " that he
grossly insults all experts that he encounters in his affair" whiteout naming
a single one of these experts and a single insult and without adding substance
to his construed accusations.
The German judge Huelsebusch complains, that the applicant and children’s
father "insistingly wants to be right ", while the German judge Huelsebusch
deliberately covers the documented incorrect working methods of the German
jurist, social and administrative authorities in international child abduction
and boycott of access. The German judge Huelsebusch deliberately does not
explain, why at all correcting proceedings are necessary in regards to incorrect
proceedings on international child abduction and boycott of access, while
the German judge Huelsebusch against the facts of social reality wants insistently
to be right with the statement that German authorities would work correctly.
If the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the judge Hülsebusch and his
German judge colleagues would have worked correctly in accordance with the
argumentation logic of the judge Hülsebusch it is on the other hand
only to be explained with extreme difficulties how it comes to eight years
of proceedings on international child abduction to Germany and resulting
boycott of access as well as to the proceedings for assuming responsibility.
The German judge Huelsebusch complains that the applicant and children’s
father "addresses political leadership, to make grave allegations against
judges of committing severe criminal offences and to make respective demands
for criminal prosecution ". In a democratic society, the judge and his official
service in the name of the people and paid by the people needs to be submitted
to correct verification and criticism by the public. Under the perquisites
that judge Huelsebusch may have the personal political opinion that Germany
should most probably not a democratic constitutional state, the quality assurance
as well as the understanding of responsibility of judges' acting quite naturally
are gaining completely different dimensions. Thus in this case, the political
and judicial way through the German instances aiming at altering the German
constitution or even abolishing the German constitution has be opened on
recommendation of the German judge Hülsebusch.
While the German judge Huelsebusch complains that the applicant and children’s
father makes "absurd connections of historical events", the German judge
Huelsebusch supports as documented on one side German officials, that call
children abducted to Germany "German children", who turns to the political
leadership to make grave allegations against judges and to make demands for
criminal prosecution " while the applicant acts against the unconstitutional
acts with a national socialist background of German judges, the German judge
Huelsebusch has to date brought no evidence, that shows that the German judge
Huelsebusch acts against the Nazis, against nazi jurists and against the
resurrection of the nazi school of thought within the judiciary of the Federal
Republic of Germany.
The German judge Huelsebusch insults and slanders the applicant and children’s
father with the statement, that the applicant and children’s father "twists
the facts ", without grounding or substantiating his accusation. The German
judge Huelsebusch as documented, unfounded and in an inadmissible manner
calls the applicant a liar.
The German judge Huelsebusch insults and slanders the applicant and children’s
father with the statement, that the applicant and children’s father makes
"absurd connections to historical events". The German judge Huelsebusch simultaneously
refuses to name the jurists that served the nazi regime, to name the crimes
of the jurists that served the nazi regime, as well as to mention the refusal
to de-nazify the judiciary by German officials in the magisterial district
of Oldenburg. While the German judge Huelsebusch appears to be in doubt of
the Nuremberg tribunal as well as the judgements in regards to crimes against
humanity inclusive of child abduction and alienation, the German judge Huelsebusch
simultaneously refuses to render an account for the incorrect working methods
of the responsible German officials in regards to international child abduction
and boycott of access.
The alienation cycle of the nazi child abduction program is purposely instituted
to Germanise the abducted children.
While the German judge Huelsebusch insults and slanders the applicant and
children’s father with the statement, that the applicant and children’s father
makes " absurd connections to historical events " the German judge Huelsebusch
supports as documented on one side German officials, that call children abducted
to Germany "German children" and deliberately refuses on the other side as
documented to process the legal demand of the 20.11.2003 to respect the legal
protection of the binational foreign born children which were abducted to
Germany to their foreign identity.
The German judge Huelsebusch insults and slanders the applicant and children’s
father with the statement, that the applicant and children’s father with
the statement, the applicant and children’s father commits "unsinnige Gesetzesauslegungen".
Simultaneously the German judge Huelsebusch refuses to name the legal basis
for deliberate delay of proceedings and the deliberate non-enforcement of
court ordered access as is deliberately practised by the district court of
Wilhelmshaven.
The German judge Huelsebusch says, that "no German authority is obliged to"
to examine national socialistic body of thought of German authorities and
German official employees. This theory brought forward by the German judge
Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven is to be denoted as extremely
"daring" and requires further examination via the available legal measures.
The German judge Huelsebusch deliberately refuses the right to a fair trail
and the right to be heard with the statement "On these grounds I will not
forward your latest submission to anyone and in future I will not take notice
of submissions with comparative format and contents but will only classify
them for non-processing". The German judge Huelsebusch refuses the negotiation
of subject matters in which he obviously comes into a conflict of interests
with his own personal political conviction against the constitutional principle
of independence.
The German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven has the
opportunity to officially excuse the behaviour of the German judge Huelsebusch
within the usual judicial delay of two weeks.
The morally and politically responsible director of the district court of
Wilhelmshaven has the opportunity to officially excuse the behaviour of the
German judge Huelsebusch within the usual judicial delay of two weeks.
Dear Mr. German judge Huelsebusch from the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
Your praiseworthy approach as a German judge to want to stand your historical
responsibility, is greeted as a praiseworthy start.
It is to be pointed out to you for your understanding of democracy and the
constitutionality.
You are legally obliged to in accordance with the guidelines of the Federal
Ministry of Justice, the justice Ministry of Lower Saxony, as well as the
German criminal code to accept criminal charges.
Certainly you are free in your "independence" to correctly process the forwarding
of the criminal charges, you can either forward them or you can deliberately
not forward them.
To clarify the factual content following your official statement it is now
to be made know if, you have considered to refuse to correctly process the
criminal charges in the legal matter Hickman versus the city of Wilhelmshaven,
an official statement from you is required for the continued legal course,
as to if you have considered to deliberately obstruct the orderly legal course
so as to collaborate with the accused.
The following is brought to your attention in regards to the factual content
and the incorrect behavioural pattern and working methods German judges and
German courts:
Your praiseworthy start to admit, that German judges and German courts deliberately
cause the applicant costs in proceedings in regards to custody and access,
while German judges and German courts as documented at the district court
of Wilhelmshaven in proceedings in regards to international child abduction
to Germany and boycott of access has been deliberately delayed over a time
period of one year and court ordered access has deliberately not been enforced
over a period of two years, is greeted as a praiseworthy start.
Certainly it is your choice in your "independence" to join these incorrect
working methods or to offer help.
To clarify the factual content of your official statement, that you are not
willing to criticise the incorrect working methods of your immediate German
judge colleagues, requires an official statement on your position for the
further legal course, whether you meant inform where that you collaborate
with the responsible family judges or whether you will independently
take legal measures against your German judge colleagues of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven.
Your praiseworthy start as a German judge to want to stand your historical
responsibility, in particular in the context of national socialistic school
of thought and it’s resurrection in the judiciary of the Federal Republic
of Germany is greeted as a praiseworthy start.
In your position of "independence" you are free to decide to deliberately
further the resurrection of national socialistic shoal of thought in the
judiciary of the Federal Republic of Germany or to with the available democratic
legal measures clearly and correctly to oppose them.
Your praiseworthy start in the recognition, that the applicant speaks out
and acts against the criminal activities of German judge should be greeted
as a praiseworthy start.
The following is brought to your attention in regards to the factual content
of the resurrection of national socialistic school of thought in the judiciary
of the federal Republic of Germany and amongst German authorities.
German judges have promoted Hitler and National Socialism.
German judges and jurists with the judiciary apparatus have served as a terror
instrument on the one hand, for the unscrupulous implementation of the propagated
political aims as well as on the other hand for the oppression and silencing
of resistance and opposition with obedience to the Fuehrer Adolf Hitler.
German judges and jurists have covered each other when it was about assuming
responsibilities for the German Crimes against Humanity.
Der anschließende Hochverratsprozeß gegen Hitler, Ludendorff
und andere geriet zu einer Farce. Die Angeklagten durften Propagandareden
gegen die Republik und ihre Politiker halten; der Ankläger agierte eher
als Verteidiger. Am 1. April 1924 wurde Ludendorff freigesprochen, Hitler
erhielt fünf Jahre Festungshaft mit der Aussicht auf Begnadigung nach
sechs Monaten, die übrigen Angeklagten kamen mit noch geringeren Strafen
davon. Das Gericht lehnte es ausdrücklich ab, den NSDAP-Führer
gemäß den Bestimmungen des Republikschutzgesetzes als wegen Hochverrats
verurteilten Ausländer nach Österreich abzuschieben: Bei einem
Mann, "der so deutsch denkt und fühlt wie Hitler" und der sich durch
"rein vaterländischen Geist und edelsten Willen" auszeichne, komme diese
Maßnahme nicht in Frage.
Kampf um die Republik 1919-1923; Informationen zur politischen Bildung (Heft
261)
Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung- Reinhard Sturm
In einem Gemeinwesen, das den Staat als Mittel der nationalsozialistischen
Weltanschauung ansieht, ist das Gesetz Plan und Wille des Führers...Der
deutsche Rechtswahrer ist heute Mitarbeiter des Führer. Nationalsozialistisches
Recht und Plan und Wille des Führers können nur von Nationalsozialisten
erkannt und gewahrt werden. Der Führer ist nicht Staatsorgan, sondern
oberster Gerichtsherr der Nation und höchster Gesetzgeber...
- Staatsrechtler Carl Schmitt
Ich werde dem Führer des deutschen Reiches und Volkes, Adolf Hitler,
treu und gehorsam sein, die Gesetze beachten und meine Amtspflichten gewissenhaft
erfüllen, so wahr mir Gott helfe.
- auf den Führer verpflichten
- "Mein Führer!
Ihnen, meinen Führer, bitte ich melden zu dürfen: das Amt, das
Sie mir verliehen haben, habe ich angetreten und mich inzwischen eingearbeitet.
Mein Dank für die Verantwortung, die Sie mir anvertraut haben, soll
darin bestehen, daß ich treu und mit aller Kraft an der Sicherheit
des Reiches und der inneren Geschlossenheit des deutschen Volkes durch eigenes
Beispiel als Richter und als Führer der Männer des Volksgerichtshofs
arbeite, stolz, Ihnen, mein Führer, dem obersten Gerichtsherrn und Richter
des deutschen Volkes, für die Rechtsprechung Ihres höchsten politischen
Gerichtes verantwortlich zu sein.
Der Volksgerichtshof wird sich stets bemühen, so zu urteilen, wie er
glaubt, daß Sie, mein Führer, den Fall selbst beurteilen würden.
Heil mein Führer! In Treue, Ihr politischer Soldat Roland Freisler."
- Dies schrieb Freisler am 15. 10. 1942, wenige Wochen nach seiner Ernennung
zum Präsidenten des Volksgerichtshofs. Zitiert nach Heribert Ostendorf,
"Roland Freisler – Mörder im Dienste Hitlers", in: Zeitschrift für
Rechtspolitik 5/1994, S. 169
It would be reasonably expected that you as "honest and decent Germans" certainly
know German history.
Nevertheless, for completion of the file, the background and content of the
nazi child abduction, alienation and Germanisation programs will be explicitly
named.
In the German history of deliberate aggressive and anti-human violations
of international law, the Nazis intentionally apply state organised child
abduction and alienation in order to implement their national socialist demographic
and racial political goals.
Thereby children abducted into the Third Reich are subjected to alienation
and programming in order to speed up the wanted process of Germanisation.
Socio-political factors as backgrounds are among others that the implementation
of state political aims (e.g. war of aggression and conquering, extension
of the available soil for the people with simultaneous demand for domination
by the master race) is opposed by an insufficient birth rate and that the
elevation of the own race as the superior declared race demands the oppression
and eradication of foreign race characteristics.
The content analysis of literature about the state run child abduction and
alienation program of the Nazis provides the following aspects whose re-appearances
within the current practice by German authorities in international child
abduction and boycott of access has to be checked on parallels :
--- Child abduction
--- Alienation
--- Racism
--- Germanisation
--- Manipulation of files
In the first quarter of the 20th century, the Nazis conducted a state run
child abduction and alienation program as part of their Germanisation plan.
As a result of the Nuremberg Trials, and after nearly two years of study,
the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted on 9th December, 1948,
a Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In
this Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national ethnical, racial or religious
group, as such : [...] forcibly transferring children of the group to another
group. Those who cannot learn from the past are condemned to repeat it. In
the last quarter of the 20th century, the German government does not prosecute
those German judicial, social and administrative German state authorities
which are involved in legalising international child abduction to Germany
and resulting boycott of access.
In the proceedings against Ulrich Greifelt and others of the UNITED STATES
MILITARY TRIBUNAL in Nuremberg from 10. October 1947 until 10. March 1948
leading SS-members from the group around Heinrich Himmler have been condemned
due to crimes against humanity among others on account of child abduction.
In the German history of international child abduction, the proceedings of
judicial, social and administrative authorities of Lower Saxony already have
a fixed famous place due to their documented low conscience of injustice
and due to certain traditional family law practice. The proceedings of authorities
of Lower Saxony in cases of international child abduction have already provoked
the intervention of the French President Jacques Chirac and the US-President
Bill Clinton.
Order to refrain to the German judge Huelsebusch
The previously described praiseworthy start of the German judge Huelsebusch
are not in conformance with his documented behaviour, in particular in his
historic responsibility as a German judge.
Hereby the official invitation is handed to the district court of Wilhelmshaven
under the moral and political responsibility of the director Kahlen, to instruct
the German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven to refrain
from insulting, threatening and coercing the applicant because the applicant
speaks out against the resurrection of national socialistic school of thought
in the judiciary of the Federal Republic of Germany and German Authorities.
Obviously the German judge Huelsebusch as documented intends to voice his
political opinion, that nazi injustice and nazi terror as well as the acting
before national socialist background should not be stopped by legal remedies
in the Federal Republic of Germany.
In this regard there is exists without doubt a need for clarification and
reasoning.
Certainly the German judge in his "independence" has the right to institute
legal measures against the applicant, because the applicant clearly speaks
out against the resurrection of national socialistic school of thought in
the judiciary of the Federal Republic of Germany and German Authorities but
also legal remedies against anti democratic behaviour and working methods
in a Germany, that according to the constitution serves the freedom of the
world in a united Europe.
It may be put into question for the time being, in how far the German judge
Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven out of ground of affinity
considers to further PROMOTE national socialistic school of thought. The
magnitude of his true intentions the German judge Huelsebusch can present
in a substantiated declaration for the further legal course.
Declaration of intent of the German judge Huelsebusch of the district court
of Wilhelmshaven
PLEASE DELETE WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE
Hereby the official request for your official statement and declaration of
intent within the usual legal delay of two weeks in the frame of your independence
in a democratic society.
Your official statement and declaration of intent is needed to be correctly
announced with the official stamp of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
which will be used for further political and judicial proceedings at the
national and the international level.
1 a) The German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
hereby officially declares, that he collaborates with the German family judges
of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, in particular with the incorrect
working methods of judge Staubwasser in international child abduction and
boycott of access.
1 b) The German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
hereby officially declares, that he does not collaborate with the family
judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, but that he distances himself
from the responsible family judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven.
To officially and correctly distance himself from these family judges of
the district court of Wilhelmshaven, the German judge Huelsebusch of the
district court of Wilhelmshaven will institute legal measures against the
responsible these family judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven, so
that these these family judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven can
correctly assume responsibility for their documented incorrect actions in
international child abduction, boycott of access and alienation.
2 a) The German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven
hereby officially declares, that he collaborates with Heinrich Himmler as
well as with the convicted SS-Fuehrern out of the group of Heinrich Himmler,
that were convicted by the Nuremberg Tribunal on the grounds of crimes against
humanity, in particular child abduction, boycott of access and alienation
alternatively forced Germanisation.
The German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven hereby
officially declares that he explicitly distances himself from the nazi regime
and the national socialistic school of thought. To officially and correctly
distance himself from national socialistic school of thought in the legal
practice and in the legal reality of the Federal Republic of Germany, the
German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven is to institute
legal measures against all still living jurists, that served the nazi regime.
On the grounds of the particular understanding of democracy and the constitutional
state principle of the German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of
Wilhelmshaven, Mr Huelsebusch will institute further legal measures against
all judges of the Federal Republic of Germany, that acquitted the judges
of the nazi regime.
3a) The German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven hereby
officially declares, that he uses his historical responsibility, that judge
Huelsebusch collaborates with the German judges that under a German constitution
intentionally promoted, Adolf Hitler, national socialism and the 2 world
war.
3b) The German judge Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven hereby
officially declares, that he uses his historical responsibility, that judge
Huelsebusch collaborates with the German judges that under a German constitution
intentionally promoted, Adolf Hitler, national socialism and the 2 world
war. To officially and to correctly document that he distances himself from
the German judges that promoted Adolf Hitler, national socialism and the
second world war judge Huelsebusch will institute legal remedies against
the responsible German judges and Adolf Hitler, so that they may correctly
assume the responsibility for their unjust acts and for their crimes against
humanity. The German judge Huelsebusch so by engages in the praiseworthy
act with civil courage that has been encouraged by the former Justice Minister
of Lower Saxony Christian Pfeiffer. . Not only that the German judge Huelsebusch
supports the annulment of nazi judgements, as well as recompensation of the
victims of nazi injustice, nazi terror but judge Huelsebusch speaks out explicitly
for the historical working off with both the civil and criminal prosecution
of the nazi perpetrators.
Official applications to the district court of Wilhelmshaven
Hereby the legal demand in regards to a disciplinary enquiry and disciplinary
measures to be instituted against the German judge Huelsebusch. The German
judge Huelsebusch engages himself as documented in insult, treat and coercion
against the applicant because he speaks out against the resurrection of national
socialistic national socialist school of thought in the Federal Republic
of Germany in the judiciary and amongst German Authorities.
As documented and proven the district court of Wilhelmshaven under the moral
and political responsibility of the director Mr. Kahlen lets the foreign
father as well as the tax payer invest in procedures in regards to access,
who’s court ordered access with the children abducted to Germany has deliberately
not been enforced for a period of two years and court proceedings which have
been deliberately delayed for a period of one year.
The district court of Wilhelmshaven under the moral and political responsibility
of the director Mr. Kahlen documents on the one hand, that the German Judge
Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven blames the applicant for
the inadmissible comparison between the historical crimes against humanity
by the nazi jurists and the crimes against humanity in the practice of German
family law.
The district court of Wilhelmshaven under the moral and political responsibility
of the director Mr. Kahlen documents on the other hand, that the German Judge
Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven who is paid in the name
of the people in a democratic constitutional state, has to date not instituted
legal measures against nazis, nazi jurists and their crimes against humanity.
The district court of Wilhelmshaven under the moral and political responsibility
of the director Mr. Kahlen documents on the other hand, that the German Judge
Huelsebusch of the district court of Wilhelmshaven who is paid in the name
of the people in a democratic constitutional state, has to date not instituted
legal measures against his German judge colleague Staubwasser of the district
court of Wilhelmshaven and against his documented incorrect working methods.
Hereby the official application to the district court of Wilhelmshaven for
the German judge Huelsebusch to hand in the following within the usual legal
delay of two weeks:
--- The naming of the employees and the respective individual insults in
accordance with the vision and statement of the German judge Huelsebusch
for further legal action.
--- The naming of the individual incorrect working methods in international
child abduction and boycott of access of each and every German judicial,
social, and administrative employee, as well as the official declaration
of the German judge Huelsebusch as to whether he collaborates with or distances
himself with legal measures.
--- The answer to the declaration of intent.
Legal demand to refrain from the attempt of inciting the petitioner of the
child to the criminal offence of child trafficking
Hereby the official legal demand is entered to refrain from the attempt to
incite the petitioner and father of the child to acts of criminal offences
in trafficking of children and humans by intentionally generating turnover
and profit of judicial business with the incorrect proceedings by German
authorities in child abduction, boycott of access and misuse of authority.
Dear Mr Kahlen director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the district court of Wilhelmshaven,
Criminal charges against Heinrich Himmler due to child
abduction
and crimes against humanity
In accordance with the official guideline of the German federal ministry
of Justice (FILE NUMBER R B 3 - zu: 9311/22-2-23 335/2033 from 14 April 2003)
as well as in accordance with the criminal law procedure regulations criminal
charges against Heinrich Himmler are entered directly at the district court
of Wilhelmshaven at the director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven on
the grounds of child abduction and crimes against humanity. The applicant
engages himself in praiseworthy activities with civil courage, that was encouraged
by the previous justice minister of Lower Saxony, Christian Pfeiffer. Not
only that the applicant supports the annulment of nazi judgements, as well
as recompensation of the victims of nazi injustice, nazi terror but the applicant
speaks out explicitly for the historical working off with both the civil
and criminal prosecution of the nazi perpetrators.
The judges of the district court of Wilhelmshaven are free in their "independence"
in regards to their own individual political convictions and understanding
of democracy and the constitutional state to independently institute legal
remedies against the nazi perpetrator Heinrich Himmler.
Dear Mrs. Astrid Vockert,
Vice president of the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Parliament of Lower Saxony,
The document presented is to be entered to the official petitions PET 00447/08/15
PET 05816/11/14 as well as to open new petition procedures at the Parliament
of Lower Saxony as requested.
Hereby the official application, that the Parliament of Lower Saxony oversee
the proceedings against nazis and the nazi school of thought at the judicial
authorities of both Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg.
Hereby the official petition in accordance with article §17 of German
basic law for a complaint to the supervision authority with disciplinary
measures including the release for office in respect to the German judge
Huelsebusch. The German judge Huelsebusch engages himself in documented insult,
threat and coercion against the applicant , because the applicant speaks
out against the resurrection of nazi school of thought in the judiciary
and German authorities of the Federal Republic of Germany.
A German court that directly causes costs for the applicant and the tax payer
in custody and access proceedings, while German judges and German courts
as documented at the district court of Wilhelmshaven in the matter of international
child abduction to Germany and the boycott of access that follows over a
time period of one year, deliberate delays proceedings and deliberately does
not enforce court ordered access over a period of two years, an on the grounds
of the wasting of tax money in no way justify it‘s existence.
Hereby the official petition in accordance with article §17 of German
basic law to the Parliament of Lower Saxony, for the immediate closing of
the district court of Wilhelmshaven and to distribute it’s tasks to other
competent courts in Lower Saxony.
Dear Dr. Busch, Mrs. Bakker, Mr. Wessels, Mrs. Ballnus,
Dear Madams, Dear Sirs at the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony,
The document presented is to be entered to the official complaint cycle under
the complaint numbers 4121 E -S4. 54/03 and 3700 E - 204.37/03 at the Justice
Ministry of Lower Saxony.
Hereby the official application, that the Justice Ministry of Lower Saxony
oversee the proceedings against nazis and the nazi school of thought at the
judicial authorities of both Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg.
Hereby the official legal application for a disciplinary enquiry with disciplinary
measures including the release for office in respect to the German judge
Huelsebusch. The German judge Huelsebusch engages himself in documented insult,
threat and coercion against the applicant , because the applicant speaks
out against the resurrection of nazi school of thought in the judiciary
and German authorities of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Dear Mrs. Marita Sehn, chairwoman of the petitions commission
of the German Federal Parliament,
As proven and documented as the example from Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg,
German judicial social and administrative authorities involved in international
child abduction to Germany and the boycott of access that follows engage
in racism and hate of strangers in their behaviour and working methods. Whereas
the human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany at the Federal
Justice Ministry, Klaus Stoltenberg officially states the opposite in international
and human rights issues.
Hereby the official petition to the German Federal Parliament handed
into the appropriate highest Federal Authority for examination, here the
Federal Ministry of Justice for the immediate release of Mr. Klaus Stoltenberg
from the office of human rights commissioner of the Federal Republic of Germany
at the Justice Ministry.
In light of the publications presented by the Federal Ministry of Justice
such as information brochures, behavioural guidelines and legal projects
it is to be checked in how far protection is offered to victims of child
abduction, boycott of access and alienation and will be improved in the future.
In the same way the initiatives of the Federal Justice Ministry for the payment
of reparations to the victims of child abduction are to be examined.
In the same way the initiatives of the Federal Justice Ministry for the transparent
historical working of the nazi steered child abduction and alienation programs
are to be examined.
Hereby the official application, that the German Bundestag oversee the proceedings
against nazis and the nazi school of thought at the judicial authorities
of both Wilhelmshaven and Oldenburg.
Hereby the official application is made to integrate the online documentation
presented into the internet presence of the German Federal Parliament Online-Documentation:http://www.michael-hickman.org
Yours faithfully
Michael Hickman
Voluntary Independent Special Rapporteur
on the situation of
Human Rights in Germany
to the United Nations and
to the European Institutions
|
Related Subject Matter:
|
|