In accordance with the official statements of the German federal government, German family judges would have been especially trained in the child matter of international child abduction in reaction to the strong international criticism about the German court proceedings and decisions. This phenomenon is very remarkable as it does not explain why German judges in contrast to judges from other countries have extreme difficulties to understand the principles of child abduction and boycott of access and therefore need special training, while the official propaganda is praising good German work and standard.

In accordance with the official statements of the German federal government, the competencies within the German court system would have been re-arranged in reaction to the strong international criticism about the German court proceedings and decisions. Due to the lack of experience, lack of knowledge, lack of special training and the wrongful assignment of competencies to hundreds of district courts, the higher regional courts would have been especially assigned to deal with the task of international child abduction and boycott of access.

This concretely means that in accordance with the official statements of the German government , the Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg is officially declared as a court which would have competencies and specially trained judges to deal with the subject matters of international child abduction and boycott of access. This also means that officially the Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg would be able and competent to rectify and correct such incorrect proceedings of the sub-ordinated district court of Wilhelmshaven as undue delay proceedings in child matters an non enforcement of court ordered access; especially as the undue delay of proceedings and the non enforcement of court orders is among the aspects of international complaints about the German court proceedings.

Are the following listed proceedings of the Higher Regional court of Oldenburg the civilized constitutional in the tradition of German historical leitkultur proceedings about which the German government is praising itself in the official propaganda and for which the German government in accordance with Article 65 of the German constitution is responsible and judicially liable ?

Related Subject Matters:

• German history of international and inner state child abduction/boycott of access

CN 14 AR 2/01
compare
District court of
Wilhelmshaven

Request to take a stance from the higher regional court of Oldenburg with the German judge Kuhlmann to the foreign left-behind father on the demand for rejection due to bias which the German family judge Bessel from the district court of Wilhelmshaven has entered himself. The German family judge Bessel had led criminal law proceedings against the foreign left-behind parent during his absence and is now working as a family judge on his family law matters. The criminal matter is about a criminal charge of the city of Wilhelmshaven against the foreign left-behind parent initiated by the social authorities, here the Children's Welfare Office (Jugendamt) of the city of Wilhelmshaven, as the foreign left-behind parent criticizes the discrimination by the Jugendamt in public.

Complaint against the decision of the district court of Wilhelmshaven from 25.07.2003 case file number 16 F 229/03 UG with the documentation :

• Legalization of boycott of access in the wake of international child abduction by German authorities
  

Decision of the higher regional court of Oldenburg with deliberate ignorance of the rejection due to bias by the judges Bartels, Schubert, Kuhlmann. The higher regional court rejects the appeal against the decision of the district court of Wilhelmshaven with the emergency exit trick of referring to formalities, here the civil process regulation, whereas the higher regional court under the judges Bartels, Schubert and Kuhlmann does  all doubts of procedural legal requirements, irregularities and mistakes of the district court of Wilhelmshaven which have occurred to this time. On the other hand, the German judges Bartels, Schubert and Kuhlmann, while quoting the civil process regulation, violate the very same civil process regulation, because the German judges Bartels, Schubert and Kuhlmann deliberately ignore the rejection on the grounds of bias in contravention of the civil process regulation while taking their decision.

Criminal charges and complaints to the supervision authority against judge Bartels from the higher regional court of Oldenburg due to child abduction, child trafficking and formation of criminal conspiracy with the German family judge Staubwasser from the regional court of Wilhelmshaven to the regional court of Wilhelmshaven.

Criminal charges and complaints to the supervision authority against judge Schubert from the higher regional court of Oldenburg due to child abduction, child trafficking and formation of criminal conspiracy with the German family judge Staubwasser from the regional court of Wilhelmshaven to the regional court of Wilhelmshaven.

The director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen informs about the forwarding of criminal charges and complaints to the supervision authority against judge Bartels from the higher regional court of Oldenburg president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg.

The director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen informs about the forwarding of criminal charges and complaints to the supervision authority against judge Schubert from the higher regional court of Oldenburg president of the higher regional court of Oldenburg.

313 E 3 - 32/03
RC
Oldenburg

The president of the regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert informs about the forwarding of the complaint to the supervision authority against the president of the regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert to the president of the higher regional court of and recommends to enter criminal charges at the competent prosecutor of Oldenburg.

313 E
DC
Wilhelmshaven

The director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen informs about the forwarding of criminal charges and complaints to the supervision authority against the president of the regional court of Oldenburg Mr. Schubert.

Email confirmation of entry for the complaint to the supervision authority against  the judges Bartels Schubert from the higher regional court of Oldenburg

Criminal charges and complaints to the supervision authority against judge Kuhlmann from the higher regional court of Oldenburg due to child abduction, child trafficking and formation of criminal conspiracy with the German family judge Staubwasser from the regional court of Wilhelmshaven to the regional court of Wilhelmshaven.

The director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen refuses the forwarding of criminal charges against judge Kuhlmann from the higher regional court of Oldenburg. The district court of Wilhelmshaven refuses to process criminal charges against the official guidelines of the German federal ministry of justice as well as against the official guidelines of the justice ministry of Lower Saxony. In addition, the director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen, who is quoting the "German law" for the reasoning of his refusal, is violating the regulations for criminal law procedures as documented, which clearly state that criminal charges are also to be entered at the district court. The director of the district court of Wilhelmshaven Mr. Kahlen does also not explain why he has correctly forwarded criminal charges to the competent prosecutor and why he is now he refusing the correct forwarding

Complaint on the inactivity of the district court of Wilhelmshaven to the higher regional court of Oldenburg in the case 16 F 229/03 UG of international child abduction to Germany and resulting boycott of access against judge Staubwasser from the district court of Wilhelmshaven.

Confirmation of receipt in the proceedings on falsifying court documents 16 F 357/03 SO of the 10 October 2003, print confirmation of receipt dated the 13.10.03, stamp of the higher regional court of Oldenburg from 13.10.03 and post stamp from the 13.10.03.

The higher  regional court of Oldenburg informs as to the opening of a grievance in the case 16 F 357/03 SO against the district court of Wilhelmshaven. Whereas the higher regional court of Oldenburg first informs of the opening the case on the 22.10.2003  the entry of the legal matter presented was strangely dated the 13.10.2003. Only after the inactivity complaint against the inactivity of the higher regional court of Oldenburg of the 20.10.2003 does the higher regional court reacts to three other grievance proceedings against the district court of Wilhelmshaven but only with information in connection with one of the grievances.